An interventional study of Motion-triggered NMES training protocol and Non-Motion-triggered NMES training protocol in Shoulder Dislocation, sponsored by Sportorthopädie Zentrum in Wien Hietzing. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-14.
Sponsored by Sportorthopädie Zentrum in Wien Hietzing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The successful application of treatment protocols using motion-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for treatment-resistant functional posterior shoulder instability was recently demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the concept of a motion-triggered NMES training protocol through objective clinical outcome parameters and its impact on external rotational (ER) shoulder strength and throwing velocity in healthy, elite-level handball players.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the concept of a motion-triggered NMES training protocol through objective clinical outcome parameters and its impact on external rotational (ER) shoulder strength and throwing velocity in healthy, elite-level handball players. It is hypothesized that a 6-week motion-triggered NMES shoulder strengthening training protocol in elite-level handball players would lead to an increase in throwing velocity due to an improved motor ability and ER shoulder strength.
105 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Dislocation; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 60 across 71 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Dislocation.
Browse Shoulder Dislocation studies →This is the only study on the registry with Sportorthopädie Zentrum in Wien Hietzing as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Subjects of the control group undergo a conventional standardized strength training program (3x/week, 30 minutes for 6 weeks) with concentric, eccentric, and functional training exercises.
Other: Non-Motion-triggered NMES training protocol
Experimental group subjects undergo a motion-triggered NMES shoulder strengthening training program (3x/week, 30 minutes for 6 weeks) using the Shoulder Pacemaker (NCS Lab Srl, Modena, Italy), a motion activated stimulation device to strengthen muscular disbalances. This is accomplished through varying neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity based on the angle of motion of the arm producing subtetanic contraction and provoking supraspinal neural adaptations. Electrode placement: electrode 1, inferior to the scapular spine (infraspinatus, teres minor, + posterior deltoid); electrode 2, medial to the medial scapula border (lower trapezius + rhomboids) . Sets x repetitions: 3x20; Levels: Level 1-3; Exercise 1: L1: Supported row, L2: Front raises in 45°, L3 Front raises (thumbs up); Exercise 2: L1: Resisted front raises, L2: Crossbody resisted raises, L3: Crossbody 'forehand swing'; Exercise 3: L1: Rear dealt fly, L2: Single arm resisted row, L3: Underhand serve
Other: Motion-triggered NMES training protocol
Experimental group subjects undergo a motion-triggered NMES shoulder strengthening training program (3x/week, 30 minutes for 6 weeks) using the Shoulder Pacemaker (NCS Lab Srl, Modena, Italy), a motion activated stimulation device to strengthen muscular disbalances. This is accomplished through varying neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity based on the angle of motion of the arm producing subtetanic contraction and provoking supraspinal neural adaptations. Electrode placement: electrode 1, inferior to the scapular spine (infraspinatus, teres minor, + posterior deltoid); electrode 2, medial to the medial scapula border (lower trapezius + rhomboids) . Sets x repetitions: 3x20 Levels: Level 1-3; Exercise 1: L1: Supported row, L2: Front raises in 45°, L3 Front raises (thumbs up) Exercise 2: L1: Resisted front raises, L2: Crossbody resisted raises, L3: Crossbody; forehand swing; Exercise 3: L1: Rear dealt fly, L2: Single arm resisted row, L3: Underhand volleyball
Arm Description: Subjects of the control group undergo a conventional standardized strength training program (3x/week, 30 minutes for 6 weeks) with concentric, eccentric, and functional training exercises.
Throwing velocity (km*h-1)
the difference in throwing velocity (km\*h-1) from baseline to 6-week post-intervention follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-week post-intervention follow-up.
Isometric hand-held dynamometer (HHD) ER and internal rotation (IR) maximal shoulder strength
Secondary outcome was the difference in isometric hand-held dynamometer (HHD) ER and internal rotation (IR) maximal shoulder strength at final follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-week post-intervention follow-up
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.