An interventional study of Eyebrow lift and Jaw lift in Aesthetic, sponsored by GCS Co., Ltd. Completed at 4 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.
Sponsored by GCS Co., Ltd · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The aim of this study is to compare two models of the Nobel Lift range (PDO sutures) with similar PDO devices available on the market, in a split-face comparative study. Each thread model will be used in one indication: upper face (eyebrow lift) or mid-face and lower-face.
Aesthetic efficacy of the devices will be evaluated and compared with the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), jowl laxity scale, subjective evaluation of the patient and photographs during a 12-months period. Safety of the devices and procedures will also be evaluated.
GCS Co., Ltd is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Eyebrow lift · Device: Jaw lift
Device: Eyebrow lift · Device: Jaw lift
Upper face lifting
Mid-face and low-face lifting
Comparison of Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAIS) by the investigator between both products
Non-inferiority of Noble Lift® threads in comparison with Croquis® thread, in terms of GAIS mean score on Month 3, assessed by an independent blinded investigator on photos (in global and for each indication). GAIS is a scale from 1 (worse) to 5 (very much improved).
Time frame: Month 3
Percentages of responders for Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAIS) by the investigator
GAIS is a scale from 1 (worse) to 5 (very much improved)
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Percentages of responders for Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAIS) by the subject
GAIS is a scale from 1 (worse) to 5 (very much improved)
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Change from baseline of Facial Laxity Rating Scale (FLRS) score
FLRS is a scale from 1 (mild laxity) to 9 (severe laxity)
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Percentages of subjects satisfied with the intervention using a subjective evaluation questionnaire
Answers are evaluated from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)
Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Number and percentages of immediate and early skin reactions collected by the subject
Skin reactions are scored as mild, moderate or severe
Time frame: Month 1
Number and percentages of skin reactions scored by the investigator
Skin reactions are scored as mild, moderate or severe
Time frame: Month1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Number and percentages of Adverse Events
Time frame: Month1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
GCS Co., Ltd