CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06448065GCPUpdated Jun 7, 2024

Gait Classification in Children With Cerebral Palsy, a Reliability Study

An observational study in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Region Stockholm. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-07.

Sponsored by Region Stockholm · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
3 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess whether gait classification patterns can be reliably obtained from video recordings in comparison with three-dimensional kinematic data.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Are gait classifications from video recordings reliable between raters? Are gait classifications from video recordings valid in comparison with three-dimensional kinematic data?

Gait analysis data from participants who visited the gait lab in the Karolinska Hospital will be used for this purpose.

Read the detailed description

Current retrospective observational study aims to assess the reliability and validity of gait pattern classification systems in ambulatory children with CP. Gait classification is often performed using kinematic gait data obtained via a three dimensional (3D) data captured in a specialized gait lab using infra-red cameras. However, not all hospitals and clinical centers have access to such a specialized gait lab, and therefore often use video recordings as an alternative for gait classification. It is currently not known whether such a classification based on solely video recordings is equally reliable in comparison with kinematic gait data. For this purpose, current study aims to assess the reliability and validity of video recordings to classify children with CP according to predefined gait classifications. Sagittal plane video recordings during barefoot walking in children with CP will be used to classify the study participants into seven different gait classification patterns. For reliability, inter-rater reliability between raters scoring the video recordings will be assessed. To evaluate whether video recordings could serve as a valid alternative for kinematic gait data, the agreement between the classifications from the video recordings and the kinematic data additionally will be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

  • cerebral palsy
  • gait pattern classification
03

In context

Paralysis

750 studies on the registry are indexed under Paralysis; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 199 observational studies indexed under Paralysis.

Browse Paralysis studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Stockholm is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The population from which the study participants are recruited are ambulatory children and young adults with cerebral palsy. All individuals with cerebral palsy that visited the gait lab over the past 20 years are eligible to be included in the current study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Main diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy
  • Age 3 to 18 at the time of gait analysis
  • Availability of barefoot walking data collected at the Karolinska Hospital gait lab
  • Written informed consent of both parents to use the clinically collected data as research data

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Main diagnosis of dyskinetic or ataxic cerebral palsy
  • No barefoot walking trials available
  • No kinematic data available
  • BTX-A injections 6 months prior to gait analysis
  • Orthopaedic surgery one year prior to gait analysis
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Children and adults with cerebral palsy

    Children and adults with cerebral palsy who attented the gait lab for a gait analysis are included in this study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inter-rater reliability

    Assess inter-rater reliability between multiple raters assessing video recordings of gait in children with cerebral palsy

    Time frame: approximately 12 months

  2. Concurrent validity

    Assess concurrent validity between outcome classifications from video recordings and from three-dimensional gait kinematics children with cerebral palsy

    Time frame: approximately 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06448065
Lead sponsor
Region Stockholm
Collaborators
Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2024
Start date
Apr 20, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 7, 2024

Study contacts

Cecilia Lidbeck, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion