ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06440616Updated Mar 20, 2026

Benefit of Spectral Information in Patients Suspected for Lung Cancer

An interventional study of Spectral CT images generated by a photon counting CT scanner in Lung Neoplasm Malignant, sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-20.

Sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose The aim of the study is to investigate the utilization of photon counting CT (PCCT) and the spectral information provided to determine the impact of spectral information on follow-up examinations.

As secondary aims we will compare conventional CT, CT + 18Flouro-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PCCT + 18F-FDG PET for the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of lung cancer patients.

PCCT with and without spectral information to assess the need for additional work-up,TNM classification, and sensitivity/specificity for malignant lesions. Patients will be randomized for reading with or without spectral information available within a clinical setting. The clinical readings are performed as a structured reports of all significant findings. Including both malignant and benign findings. Furthermore, in case additional follow-up/work-up is needed based on the guidelines on incidental findings by the American College of Radiology (ACR), this will be reported as well. If lesions suspicious of pulmonary malignancy is present, a provisional TNM classification is provided based on the scan findings.

After 3 months, the patient record is reviewed where additional examinations that can be attributed to the PCCT scan are recorded. The financial impact is calculated by a health economist based on the findings. PET/CT, conventional CT and PCCT combined with PET will be assessed retrospectively for comparison. Endpoints are number of supplementary examinations and cost savings. Sensitivity and specificity for any malignant finding. The T, N and M stages are assessed separately as diagnostic measures by the McNemar's test with a reference standard from the Danish Lung cancer register. The number of malignant lesions will be determined by reviewing the patient records incl. pathology assessment if available 12 months after inclusion of the last patient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Neoplasm Malignant

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Spectral CT
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev is the lead sponsor of 77 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suspected of lung cancer refered to Copenhagen University Hospital as per the guidelines from the danish national health authorities from either the general practitioner or from the department of pulmonology.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot tolerate intravenous iodinated contrast
  • Already verified lung cancer from another institution
  • Comorbidities that exclude the patient from receiving treatment
  • Lack of reference standard in the form of either histology or follow-up
  • Known extrapulmonary
  • Technical limitations within the scans/reconstructions
  • other

Pr. the 29th of September included 433 participants.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    CT images without spectral information available

    Reported without access to spectral information in a normal clinical practice. Supplemental examinations suggested as per the ACR white papers for incidental findings.

  • Experimental
    CT images with spectral information available

    Reported with access to spectral information in a normal clinical practice. Supplemental examinations suggested as per the ACR white papers for incidental findings.

    Device: Spectral CT images generated by a photon counting CT scanner

Interventions

  • DeviceSpectral CT images generated by a photon counting CT scanner

    The reading radiologist will in the experimental arm have access to spectral CT images in the form of low virtual monoenergetic images, virtual non-contrast images, iodine maps and effective atomic number. In the non-interventional arms the reading radiologist will only have access to conventional CT images.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of follow up examinations

    Determine the number of suggested follow-up examinations based on the initial CT scan to learn the significance of spectral information in a clinical setting.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. T, N, and M stage

    Determine the accuracy of T, N, and M stage based on PCCT, conventional CT, PET/CT and PET/PCCT. Retrospective assessment 24 months after primary scan.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Number of malignant lesions

    Determine the number of found malignant lesions in each arm. Reference standard will be follow up or pathology within a minimum of one year of the scan. That means 12 months after the end of the inclusion period.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06440616
Lead sponsor
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
Responsible party
Michael Brun Andersen (Associate Professor, PhD, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2024
Start date
May 24, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2026

Study contacts

Michael B Andersen, PhD
Contact
michael.brun.andersen@regionh.dk
38 68 38 68 ext. +45
Michael B Andersen, PhD
principal investigator · Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion