ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06433024Updated May 31, 2024

Training of a Artificial Intelligence Model to Detect Venous Diseases Using PPG Technology

An observational study in Venous Disease, sponsored by The Whiteley Clinic. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-31.

Sponsored by The Whiteley Clinic · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals combined with Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms, for the precise classification and diagnosis of Venous Diseases of the lower limb. This study invites a group of participants who currently undergoing investigations for venous disease at The Whiteley Clinic (hereinafter referred to as TWC). The Participants will be classified into control (healthy individuals with no significant venous disease) and chronic venous disease (CVD) (diagnosed with proven venous disease) groups. Prospective participants who express an interest in being included in the study will be given a patient information sheet and will undergo a briefing of the pilot study. If they consent and sign the relevant consent forms, the participants will perform a series of standardized exercises under the supervision of a consultant vascular surgeon. Throughout the exercises, a data acquisition device attached to the ankle records the PPG signals, capturing the changes in blood volume due to the reflected PPG signals from the red blood cells during the movement. Thus, once the data is collected and recorded, this allows for the analysis of the data of the control group and CVD group against each other. During the analysis of the two groups' PPG signals, the objective lies within the capability to detect subtle nuances in the patterns of the PPG signals during the performed movements using AI algorithms. The AI algorithms will distinguish patterns or features indicating the presence or absence of venous disease. This study seeks to contribute valuable insights into enhancing the diagnosis of venous disease using PPG and AI algorithms, paving novel approaches to Venous healthcare.

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Whiteley Clinic is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study invites a group of participants who have attended The Whiteley Clinic (hereinafter referred to as TWC). The Participants are split into control (healthy individuals) and treatment (previously diagnosed with Venous disease) groups.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients are attending for investigation of suspected venous disease. Patients must be able to walk and mobile normally and have good skin integrity of the lower leg, where the PPG is attached.

All patients attending TWC are 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with known arterial occlusive disease or physical disability affecting gait or ankle movement will be excluded.

Patients unable to have a PPG attached to the lower leg (ie: active ulceration) will be excluded.

Patients unable to give consent. Pregnant female.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Individuals with CVD (Treatment Group)

    Participants who have been diagnosed with Chronic Venous Disease (CVD).

    Diagnostic Test: PPG Diagnostic

  • Individuals Without CVD (Control Group)

    Participants who have not been diagnosed with CVD.

    Diagnostic Test: PPG Diagnostic

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPPG Diagnostic

    The study investigates venous competence through three distinct exercises using photoplethysmography (PPG) technology to record blood flow in the leg veins of 20 subjects, split into two groups: those with chronic venous disease (CVD) and those without. The null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference in venous filling times (VFT) and PPG trace variations between subjects with CVD and those without under different physical conditions. The alternative hypothesis suggests that individuals with CVD will show distinct PPG patterns, particularly shorter VFT and varied pressure changes, indicative of venous reflux or obstruction. This hypothesis is chosen based on prior evidence suggesting observable differences in venous function between affected and non-affected individuals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of an AI Model for Venous Disease Detection Using PPG Signals

    The primary outcome measure of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an AI model in detecting venous disease through the using PPG signals. This will be quantified by assessing the sensitivity and specificity of the AI model when analysing PPG signals from healthy participants without venous diease, and non-healthy participants with venous disease, without the need for direct intervention of a vascular consultant. These results will help evaluate the AI model in terms of how accurately it can identify Venous disease.

    Time frame: June 2024 - September 2024

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2024; primary completion for Jul 2024, 1 month later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2024
First posted
May 29, 2024
StartEst.
Jun 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2024
CompletionEst.
Sep 2024
Last update
May 31, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06433024
Lead sponsor
The Whiteley Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 29, 2024
Start date
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 31, 2024

Study contacts

Sergio Da Silva, PhD
Contact
people@thewhiteleyclinic.co.uk
01483477199
Mark Whiteley
principal investigator · The Whiteley Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion