CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06422195Updated Apr 10, 2025

Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Modification Technique in Short Axis Approach

An interventional study of Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA) and Long Axis Approach (LA) in Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning, Short Axis and Arterial Cannulation, sponsored by Tanta University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-10.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
164
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to compare between Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Modification Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA) and Long Axis (LA) Approach for Ultrasound-guided Arterial Cannulation as regard time to successful arterial cannula insertion as well as the success rate in the first trial of insertion, number of attempts till successful arterial line placemen, complications, and operators' satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Intraoperative Arterial cannulation is recently frequently required especially in high-risk patients or patients with expected major fluid shift.

The most common site for arterial cannulation is the radial artery because of ease of accessibility, dual blood supply to the hand via the ulnar artery, and a low rate of complications. Complications from arterial cannulation include thrombosis, hematoma formation, edema and vasospasm.

Two approaches are basically identified for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation, i.e., short-axis out-of-plane (SA-OOP) and long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) techniques.

The dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique uses the short-axis view of the radial artery with gradual advancing of the needle till reaching the radial artery. Meanwhile, the ultrasound probe is being moved proximally in advance of the needle tip until it disappears from the ultrasound image. The cannula then advanced in the direction of the artery

02

Conditions studied

  • Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning
  • Short Axis
  • Arterial Cannulation
  • Long Axis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 304 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 70 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-IV.
  • Patients scheduled for elective surgery procedure that requires the use of invasive arterial pressure monitoring, as determined by the attending anesthesiologist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency patients or with Hemodynamic instability.
  • Patients who have cellulitis or infection at the site of insertion.
  • Patients with a positive modified Allen test.
  • Raynaud disease or any Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Patients with Multiple previous radial artery interventional therapies in the previous 30 days.
  • Patients scheduled for Surgery at site of insertion like forearm flap.
  • Refusal to participate by the patient.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
164 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA)

    Ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation by Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA) will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who has no subsequent role in the study. The ultrasound transducer is oriented transversely to the radial artery at the wrist, and the vessel appears as a circular anechoic structure in the ultrasound screen with gradual advancing of the needle till reaching the radial artery. Meanwhile, the ultrasound probe is being moved proximally in advance of the needle tip until it disappears from the ultrasound image. The cannula then advanced in the direction of the artery.

    Other: Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA)

  • Active comparator
    Long Axis Approach (LA)

    Ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation in Long Axis Approach (LA) will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who has no subsequent role in the study. In the LA-IP approach, an ultrasound probe is placed parallel to the radial artery and the artery appears as a tubular anechoic structure in ultrasound.

    Other: Long Axis Approach (LA)

Interventions

  • OtherDynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA)

    Ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation by Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique in Short Axis Approach (DNTP - SA) will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who has no subsequent role in the study. The ultrasound transducer is oriented transversely to the radial artery at the wrist, and the vessel appears as a circular anechoic structure in the ultrasound screen with gradual advancing of the needle till reaching the radial artery. Meanwhile, the ultrasound probe is being moved proximally in advance of the needle tip until it disappears from the ultrasound image. The cannula then advanced in the direction of the artery.

  • OtherLong Axis Approach (LA)

    Ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation in Long Axis Approach (LA) will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who has no subsequent role in the study. In the LA-IP approach, an ultrasound probe is placed parallel to the radial artery and the artery appears as a tubular anechoic structure in ultrasound.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to achieve successful cannulation

    Time to achieve successful cannulation will be measured from initial skin puncture until the catheter is placed into the radial artery.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheterization

Secondary outcomes

  1. The success rate

    The success rate in the first trial of insertion between the two different approaches will be assessed.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheterization

  2. Number of attempts till successful arterial cannula insertion

    Number of attempts till successful arterial cannula insertion will be recorded.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheterization

  3. Incidence of complications

    Complications including edema, hematoma, vasospasm, ischemia, thrombosis and nerve injury will be recorded.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Operators' satisfaction

    Operators' satisfaction (Level of operators' satisfaction will be assessed with a Scale from 1-5)

    Time frame: Immediately after catheterization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tanta University
    Tanta, El-Gharbia 31527, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06422195
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Maram Ibrahim Elmazny (Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt., Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2024
Start date
May 19, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Apr 10, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion