An interventional study of External Diaphragm Pacemaker treatment in Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Extubation, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 3 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-08.
Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
With the development of perinatal medicine, more and more newborns with respiratory failure can be treated due to the use of respiratory support technology. However, long-term invasive mechanical ventilation treatment can lead to a series of complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, atelectasis and air leakage syndrome, and increase the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurodevelopmental lag of premature infants. It also leads to longer hospital stays and higher hospital costs. To shorten the invasive mechanical ventilation time and improve the success rate of withdrawal through various ways is the development direction of neonatal mechanical ventilation therapy.
Respiratory muscle atrophy is common and rapid in children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, and is an important cause of ventilator dependence and withdrawal failure. The diaphragm of newborns is the main respiratory muscle, of which the diaphragm type 1 endurance fiber accounts for only about 30%, far lower than the proportion of about 55% in adults, so the diaphragm of newborns is more prone to fatigue. Previous animal experiments and clinical studies in children and adults have confirmed that diaphragmatic pacing therapy applied to patients with long-term invasive mechanical ventilation can prevent diaphragmatic atrophy, reverse diaphragmatic injury, significantly improve diaphragmatic thickness, improve diaphragmatic anti-fatigue ability, thereby increasing lung ventilation, relieving dyspnea, and achieving the effect of assisted extubation.
The neonatology Department of the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University started neonatal external diaphragm pacemaker treatment in 2022, and has completed 1383 cases so far, initially showing the effectiveness and safety of external diaphragm pacemaker treatment in neonatal population. But so far, there is no systematic evaluation of clinical intervention effect of external diaphragm pacemaker treatment on neonatal respiratory failure patients at home and abroad. Based on this, the project team intends to conduct a prospective randomized controlled study to systematically evaluate the safety of external diaphragm pacemaker in preterm infants requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥7 days at 28 to 35 weeks of gestation, and to evaluate the efficacy of external diaphragm pacemaker in adjuvant extubation.
Neonatal respiratory failure is the central or peripheral respiratory dysfunction caused by various reasons, and is an important clinical critical disease of newborns. With the development of perinatal medicine, more and more newborns with respiratory failure can be treated due to the use of respiratory support technology. However, long-term invasive mechanical ventilation treatment can lead to a series of complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, atelectasis and air leakage syndrome, and increase the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurodevelopmental lag of premature infants. It also leads to longer hospital stays and higher hospital costs. To shorten the invasive mechanical ventilation time and improve the success rate of withdrawal through various ways is the development direction of neonatal mechanical ventilation therapy.
Respiratory muscle atrophy is common and rapid in children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, and is an important cause of ventilator dependence and withdrawal failure. The diaphragm of newborns is the main respiratory muscle, of which the diaphragm type 1 endurance fiber accounts for only about 30%, far lower than the proportion of about 55% in adults, so the diaphragm of newborns is more prone to fatigue. Studies have shown that phrenic atrophy usually begins within 18-69 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation and progresses at a rate of 4-7% per day.
Previous animal experiments and clinical studies in children and adults have confirmed that diaphragmatic pacing therapy applied to patients with long-term invasive mechanical ventilation can prevent diaphragmatic atrophy, reverse diaphragmatic injury, significantly improve diaphragmatic thickness, improve diaphragmatic anti-fatigue ability, thereby increasing lung ventilation, relieving dyspnea, and achieving the effect of assisted extubation.
In February 1987, the external diaphragm pacemaker independently developed by Chen et al at Sun Yat-sen University of Medical Science was applied to clinical practice, setting a precedent for external diaphragmatic pacing at home and abroad. The basic principle is to perform low-frequency pulse electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve through the electrodes on the body surface to make the regular contraction and relaxation of the diaphragm and increase the degree of movement of the diaphragm, so as to improve the ventilation function of the patient. In China, Cai et al observed that external diaphragm pacemaker can increase the degree of immediate diaphragm movement in normal people, and significantly increase the degree of immediate movement in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the range of diaphragm movement after continuous treatment for 20-30 days, and significantly improve the symptoms of dyspnea.
The neonatology Department of the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University started neonatal external diaphragm pacemaker treatment in 2022, and has completed 1383 cases so far, initially showing the effectiveness and safety of external diaphragm pacemaker treatment in neonatal population. But so far, there is no systematic evaluation of clinical intervention effect of external diaphragm pacemaker treatment on neonatal respiratory failure patients at home and abroad. Based on this, the project team intends to conduct a prospective randomized controlled study to systematically evaluate the safety of external diaphragm pacemaker in preterm infants requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥7 days at 28 to 35 weeks of gestation, and to evaluate the efficacy of external diaphragm pacemaker in adjuvant extubation.
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
On the basis of conventional treatment, the patients in this group were treated with external diaphragm pacemaker for 2 weeks or until extubation.
Device: External Diaphragm Pacemaker treatment
The patients in this group were treated with conventional treatment.
On the basis of conventional treatment, the patients in this group were treated with external diaphragm pacemaker for 2 weeks or until extubation.The treatment process of external diaphragm pacemaker is as follows: Set parameters: pacing frequency: 5-9 times /min, generally starting from 5 times /min, and adjusted according to the tolerance of the child; Pulse frequency 30 hertz; The stimulation intensity generally starts from 2-3. If the respiratory waveform of the child on the machine is not disturbed, it indicates that the child can tolerate it and the intensity can be appropriately increased. Treatment time: generally starts from 5 minutes, the longest is not more than 20 minutes, the frequency of treatment: 1 time/day in the first week, 2 times/day in the second week.
Invasive mechanical ventilation time
Time from invasive mechanical ventilation to extubation
Time frame: through study completion, up to 100 days of life
Diaphragm geometry and function
Diaphragm ultrasound
Time frame: through study completion, up to 100 days of life
Duration of oxygen use
Duration of oxygen use
Time frame: through study completion, up to 100 days of life
Incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time frame: through study completion, up to 100 days of life
Mortality
Mortality
Time frame: through study completion, up to 100 days of life
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University