CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06401174SCREENUpdated Oct 22, 2025

Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening

An interventional study of Delivery of patient navigation in Colorectal Cancer Screening, sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute. Enrolling by invitation at 15 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-22.

Sponsored by Medstar Health Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patient navigation is an evidence-based strategy to increase screening rates among racial and ethnic minorities, but there is a gap in understanding the multi-level influences on implementation of such programs across primary care practices. The investigators will conduct a stepped-wedge, randomized trial to roll out patient navigation and patient and provider reminders across 15 clinics (3 clinics per step, 5 six-month steps). Implementation strategies will include assessing for readiness, audit and feedback, building a community coalition, engaging consumers, modifying referral tracking, and training and educating clinical stakeholders. The research team will use the electronic health record data with consideration for the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model, additional patient-reported data, and study tracking logs to measure reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and will use qualitative measures and site observations to document contextual factors, including examination of discrimination in patient experiences and provider referral patterns that may influence intervention delivery or colorectal cancer screening completion.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended by the United States Preventative Services Task Force for adults age 45-75. Patient navigation is an evidence-based strategy to increase screening rates among racial and ethnic minorities. While patient navigation is an evidence-based approach to improve screening, there is a gap in understanding the multi-level influences on implementation of such programs across primary care practices, particularly using a health-equity focused, stakeholder-centered approach. Guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) and core health and racial equity principles, the investigative team aims to increase reach of patient navigation and show effectiveness through improvement in the percentage of Black and Hispanic patients completing CRC screening. Investigators will also utilize longitudinal tracking of implementation strategies to better track implementation or intervention adaptations navigation delivery in order to inform future scale up. The research team will conduct a stepped-wedged, randomized trial to roll out patient navigation and patient and provider reminders across 15 clinics (3 clinics per step, 5 six-month steps). Implementation strategies will include assessing for readiness, audit and feedback, building a community coalition, engaging consumers, modifying referral tracking, and training and educating clinical stakeholders. Researchers will use the electronic health record data with consideration for the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model, additional patient-reported data, and study tracking logs to measure reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and will use qualitative measures and site observations to document contextual factors, including examination of discrimination in patient experiences and provider referral patterns that may influence intervention delivery or CRC screening completion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

Keywords

  • disparities
  • Patient navigation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medstar Health Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 45-75
  • Due for colorectal cancer screening
  • Identify as Black or Hispanic/Latino
  • Attend primary care visit at one of the 15 selected clinics within the step time -period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patient navigation

    Patient navigation will be rolled out at the clinic level (15 clinics). Referral orders will become available to participating clinics, with education and audit and feedback for providers. The study team will tailor patient navigation supports by clinic site for specifics on how the intervention is delivered.

    Behavioral: Delivery of patient navigation

  • No intervention
    Usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralDelivery of patient navigation

    Clinics will receive educational materials and access a referral order for patient navigation. Iterative strategies will be used to increase CRC screening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Colorectal cancer screening completion

    Completion of any USPSTF approved screening test

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reach

    Percent of patients referred out of those eligible

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Adoption

    Percent of providers referring to patient navigation

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Acceptability measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Stakeholder assessments of acceptability of navigation and implementation strategies measured on a four-item scale

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Appropriateness measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    Stakeholder assessments of appropriateness of navigation and implementation strategies measured on a four-item scale

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Feasibility measured by the Feasibility of Implementation Measure (FIM)

    Stakeholder assessments of feasibility of navigation and implementation strategies measured on 4 item scale

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Sustainability measured by the clinical sustainability assessment tool

    Understanding clinical sustainability of interventions

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • Internal Medicine Wisconsin Avenue
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Family Medicine Spring Valley
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20016, United States
  • Primary Care Lafayette
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20036, United States
  • Family Medicine Fort Lincoln
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20722, United States
  • Honeygo
    Baltimore, Maryland 21128, United States
  • MedStar Adult Medicine at Union Memorial
    Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
  • Harbor Hospital Primary Care Federal Hill
    Baltimore, Maryland 21230, United States
  • Franklin Square
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Primary Care at Franklin Square
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Charlotte Hall
    Charlotte Hall, Maryland 20622, United States
  • Internal Medicine Clinton
    Clinton, Maryland 20735, United States
  • Family Medicine
    Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, United States
  • Internal Medicine Hyattsville
    Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, United States
  • Family Medicine
    Olney, Maryland 20832, United States
  • Olney Prof Park
    Olney, Maryland 20832, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rivera Rivera JN, AuBuchon KE, Schubel LC, Starling C, Tran J, Locke M, Grady M, Mete M, Blumenthal HJ, Galarraga JE, Arem H. Supporting ColoREctal Equitable Navigation (SCREEN): a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial for patient navigation in primary care. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jun 3;5(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00598-5. PubMed 38831365 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06401174
Lead sponsor
Medstar Health Research Institute
Collaborators
National Committee for Quality Assurance
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion