CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06397495Updated Mar 31, 2026

Comparison of Learning Models in Physical Therapy Education

An interventional study of Education in Educational Problems and Surveys and Questionnaires, sponsored by Isparta University of Applied Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 21 Years to 27 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by Isparta University of Applied Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Apr 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 27 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

With the pandemic affecting the world, education systems have been subjected to mandatory changes without sufficient thought on teaching content, delivery and pedagogy. In this process, physiotherapy courses involving psychomotor skills such as manual therapy became difficult to teach and evaluate. Although the pandemic is over, it is suggested that technological approaches should be used in learning systems and incorporated into physiotherapy education. These technology-supported education models are called blended education models. The use of the flipped training model, a variant of blended training models, can improve practical skill performance. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of two different models on the quality of teaching and learning in cervical region manual therapy teaching. Suleyman Demirel University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation senior students (n=100) will be randomly divided into two groups. The control group (n=49) will be given monologue education with in-class team-based traditional education model. The practical part of the course will be taught in the classroom and applied with patient-clinician role model technique. Homework will be assigned for students to read scientific articles and analyze case examples. The entire six-week teaching program will take place in the classroom. The experimental group (n=51) will be applied the flipped model. The theoretical and practical knowledge of the course will be provided at home with the EdPuzzle education platform. They will be encouraged to read articles and analyze cases at home. The classroom environment will be used to ask questions related to the theoretical part of the course and to practice the practical application as a patient/clinician role model. The seven-week teaching program is planned in the classroom and home environment. In the evaluation of the research, explanatory sequential design method from mixed research methods will be applied. Pre-test/post-test/knowledge retention test, instructional materials motivation questionnaire and skill level/performance evaluation form will be used to evaluate the quantitative data. A lesson observation form will be used to evaluate whether the trainer provided the same competence to both groups. Semi-structured case study will be used to evaluate the reverse-face model to the experimental group with qualitative data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Educational Problems
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Flipped Model
  • Physiotherapy Education
  • Cervical Manual Therapy
  • Psychomotor Skill
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Isparta University of Applied Sciences is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 27 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Not to have participated in a vocational course program on manual therapy of the cervical region,
  • Sufficient internet access,
  • Acceptance of distance education if included in the experimental group,
  • Having and actively using a cell phone or computer with a smart operating system,
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The student wants to quit the study and does not fill in the data collection forms
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Flipped Groups

    Other: Education

  • No intervention
    Traditional Learning Groups

Interventions

  • OtherEducation

    Cervical region manual therapy training will be given with flipped learning models.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Academic motivation survey data

    Academic motivation survey data will be the first data to be obtained between the groups.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Süleyman Demirel Univesity
    Isparta, Isparta 32000, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06397495
Lead sponsor
Isparta University of Applied Sciences
Collaborators
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Suleyman Demirel University
Responsible party
Ziya Yildiz (Expert Physiotherapist, Isparta University of Applied Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 3, 2024
Start date
Oct 9, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2023
Completion
May 24, 2024
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion