ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06375772Updated Nov 19, 2024

A Controlled Human Rhinovirus Infection Study of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose in Healthy Adults

A Phase 2 interventional study of 2-Deoxy-D-glucose and Placebo in Acute Nasopharyngitis, sponsored by G.ST Antivirals GmbH. Terminated at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-19.

Sponsored by G.ST Antivirals GmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Re-calculated sample size
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

2-DG-02 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as a pre-exposure prophylaxis using the rhinovirus challenge model in healthy study participants.

Read the detailed description

2-DG-02 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2 study using the rhinovirus challenge model in healthy study participants aged 18 to 64 years.

The primary objective is to confirm the efficacy of 2-DG compared to placebo for the prevention of rhinovirus-associated illness.

Secondary objectives are

  • to evaluate the effect of 2-DG on the occurrence and course of rhinovirus infection
  • to evaluate the effect of 2-DG on the severity of symptoms of rhinovirus infection
  • to evaluate safety and tolerability of 2-DG administrated over 1 week in the presence of rhinovirus exposure
  • to evaluate pharmacokinetics of 2-DG

    128 subjects, who have been pre-screened and found to be seronegative to rhinovirus type 39, are randomized 1:1 to either 2-DG (pre-exposure prophylaxis) or placebo the day prior to inoculation. Subjects receive 2-DG or placebo starting from the day prior to inoculation until 5 days post inoculation.

Interim safety and efficacy reviews are performed by a Safety Monitoring Committee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Nasopharyngitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Common Cold

219 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Cold; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 150 across 184 interventional studies indexed under Common Cold.

Browse Common Cold studies →

Lead sponsor

G.ST Antivirals GmbH is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy male or female subjects 18 to 64 (inclusive at screening) years of age.
  • Women of and all males must practice effective during the study and be willing and able to continue contraception until end of study.
  • Signed form prior to any study-related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active smoker or history of smoking > 5 pack years.
  • Upper or lower respiratory tract infection or febrile illness
  • Presence (at screening) of serum RV-39 neutralizing antibody titer at greater than one in four (1:4) dilution.
  • Nasopharyngeal swab indicative for Influenza or SARS-CoV2 infection by rapid antigen test at baseline.
  • Prior inoculation with a virus from the same virus family as the challenge virus.
  • Any anatomic or neurologic abnormality impairing the gag reflex, or associated with an increased risk of aspiration, or any abnormality significantly altering the anatomy of the nose or nasopharynx in a substantial way that may interfere with the aims of the study and in particular any of the nasal assessments or viral challenge.
  • Positive surface antigen (HBsAg), virus antibody (HCV Ab), or antibody (HIV Ab) at screening.
  • Any confirmed or suspected disease or condition associated with immune system impairment, including auto-immune diseases, asplenia or recurrent severe infections.
  • Active allergic rhinitis or hay fever.
  • Medical history or active asthma or (COPD) or any other pulmonary disease deemed by the investigator to increase the risk of participating in the study.
  • Active nasal disease, e.g., nasal polyposis, significant septal deviation, chronic rhinosinusitis, etc.
  • Frequent epistaxis or nasal sinus surgery within 3 months before baseline.
  • Females: Pregnant, breast-feeding or intentions to become pregnant during the study.
  • Evidence or history of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Positive test for drugs of abuse at screening or prior to study drug administration.
  • Use of any prescribed or non-prescribed medication (except for , paracetamol) within 1 week or less than 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first administration of product.
  • Use of any over the counter cold prophylaxis products including nasal sprays, C-vitamins, zinc or Echinacea within 2 weeks prior to the first administration of investigational product.
  • Participation in an investigational medical product, vaccine or device study within 3 months or 5 half-lives prior to the study period (whichever is longer), or more than 4 times in the past year.
  • /allergy to any of the investigational product ingredients.
  • Individuals with close contact to at risk patient group (infants less than 3 years, the extremely elderly >80 years or infirm, pregnant women, patients with severe lung disease(e.g., asthma/cystic fibrosis (CF)/COPD), patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiencies or ongoing therapy).
  • Any abnormal history, physical finding, 12-lead safety , vital signs, laboratory value at screening or any known factor that could interfere with the objectives of the trial or the safety of the volunteer. In the case of uncertain or questionable results, tests performed during screening may be repeated before inclusion to confirm eligibility or judged to be clinically irrelevant.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Study Drug

    Each subject receives a multiple dose of a 3.5% 2-Deoxyglucose as nasal spray solution. The maximum daily dose is 56 mg/day if applied 4 times/day, over 7 days.

    Drug: 2-Deoxy-D-glucose

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Each subject receives a multiple dose of placebo as nasal spray solution. The dose is corresponding to the amount of solution needed in the serum group.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Intranasal administration

    Also known as: 2-Deoxyglucose, 2-DG

  • OtherPlacebo

    Intranasal administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The difference in the rate of rhinovirus-associated illness between 2-DG and placebo

    Difference in the rate of symptomatic illness and laboratory-confirmed infection

    Time frame: baseline until day 22

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of infected subjects

    Difference in the number of subjects with laboratory-confirmed infections. A laboratory-confirmed infection is identified either by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge using qPCR or by a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titer to RV-39 from acute (day -1) to convalescent sera (day 22) using the neutralizing assay.

    Time frame: baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing

  2. Difference in percent of infected subjects

    Difference in percentage of subjects with laboratory-confirmed infections. A laboratory-confirmed infection is identified either by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge using qPCR or by a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titer to RV-39 from acute (day -1) to convalescent sera (day 22) using the neutralizing assay.

    Time frame: baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing

  3. Difference in percent of days virus positive

    Difference in the percentage of days with a positive virus load. A positive virus load is determined by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day following the virus challenge, either using qPCR or a TCID50 assay.

    Time frame: days 2-6

  4. Difference in peak nasal virus load

    Virus load is confirmed by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge, using either qPCR or a TCID50 assay.

    Time frame: days 2-6

  5. Difference in AUC nasal virus load

    Difference in AUC log 10 nasal virus load. Virus load is confirmed by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge, using either qPCR or a TCID50 assay.

    Time frame: days 2-6

  6. Difference in Total Jackson Symptom Score

    The difference of total Jackson Symptom Score (4 point-liters scales from 0 to 3) where a lower score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing

  7. Duration of illness

    In study participants with RAI duration of illness is the time to the first day of the two consecutive days with a total symptom score ≤ 1 that occurs after the subject has met the symptom criteria for a RAI. A lower duration means a better outcome.

    Time frame: days 2-15 after start of dosing

  8. Difference in percent of days Jackson Symptom Score positive

    Percentage of days with positive Jackson Symptom Score ( score \>2), where a lower percentage means a better outcome compared to placebo.

    Time frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing

  9. Difference in Peak Jackson Symptom Score

    The highest daily total of all patient-reported symptoms on the Jackson Cold Scale (4 point-liters scales from 0 to 3 where a lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo).

    Time frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing

  10. Difference in peak total WURSS-21

    The highest daily total of all patient-reported symptoms on the WURSS-21 questionnaire (8-point Likert scales from 0 to 7) where a lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo.

    Time frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing

  11. Difference in AUC total WURSS-21

    Difference in AUC total WURSS-21 based a score recorded through the WURSS-21 questionnaire (8-point Likert scales from 0 to 7) where lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo.

    Time frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing

  12. Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug-reactions (ADRs)

    Number of AEs and ADRs assessed by type, frequency and severity graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Time frame: from screening (day -56) until end of study (day 22± 2) after start of dosing

  13. Biodistribution of multiple doses of 2-DG in plasma samples

    Analysis of 2-DG concentrations in plasma samples measured by LCMS (μg/ml).

    Time frame: baseline, days 6 and 22± 2 after start of dosing

  14. Biodistribution of multiple doses of 2-DG in nasal wash samples

    Analysis of 2-DG concentrations in nasal wash samples measured by LCMS (μg/ml).

    Time frame: baseline, days 2-6 and day 22± 2 after start of dosing

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre for Human Drug Research
    Leiden, 2333, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06375772
Lead sponsor
G.ST Antivirals GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 19, 2024
Start date
Apr 2, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 13, 2024
Completion
Aug 13, 2024
Last update
Nov 19, 2024

Study contacts

Ingrid de Visser-Kamerling, PhD
principal investigator · Centre for Human Drug Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Deoxyglucose

Start the discussion