CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06373874Updated Apr 18, 2024

The Effect of High Reality Simulation Environment on the Skills of Midwifery Students, in Newborn Heel Blood Collection

An interventional study of Heel blood collection in a newborn simulation model in Students, Educational Problems and Anxiety, sponsored by Celal Bayar University. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 32 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-18.

Sponsored by Celal Bayar University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2023, registered Apr 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
21 Years to 32 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The researchers gave midwifery students theoretical training on how to take heel blood on a newborn model. Students were asked to take heel blood on the model in the high-reality simulation environment and simulation room. The student's ability to take heel blood before and after taking heel blood in a high-reality simulation environment or on a newborn model in a simulation environment, satisfaction with learning, anxiety and self-efficacy levels were compared.

Read the detailed description

The population of the research consisted of 4th grade midwifery students studying in the fall semester of the 2022-2023 academic year (N = 98). 6 students could not continue studying. No sample selection was made and an attempt was made to reach the entire universe. The sample of the research consisted of a total of 92 midwifery students, n=46 in the control group and n=46 in the experimental group. Verbal and written permission was obtained from the students included in the research. Both the experimental and control groups were given theoretical training on heel blood collection on a model using the show-and-tell technique.Then, those in the experimental group were asked to take heel blood on a newborn model in a high-reality simulation environment. The control group was asked to take heel blood on a newborn model in the simulation laboratory. Self-Efficacy-Efficacy scale for both the experimental group and the control group. State and Trait Anxiety Scale was applied as pre-test and post-test. Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale was applied only as a posttest. The heel prick skill evaluation form was filled out by a researcher. Pre-test and post-test results, Student tudent Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning scores , and Heel Blood Skill scores were compared between the experimental and control groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Students
  • Educational Problems
  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Skills training
  • high reality simulation environment
  • skills laboratory
  • midwifery training.
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 92 is above the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Celal Bayar University is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 32 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 4th grade students (n=49) who took the Maternal and Child Health Practice course of the Midwifery Department and agreed to participate in the study voluntarily were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students in younger grades who did not take the Maternal and Child Health Practice course were excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: group that practices in a high-reality simulation environment

    The researcher showed the student how to take heel blood on the model. The researcher introduced both high-reality simulation environment. As a pre-test, the student was asked to fill out the Introductory Information Form, Self-Efficacy-Efficacy Scale and State and Trait Anxiety Scales surveys. Midwifery students in the experimental group were asked to take heel blood on a model in a high-reality simulation environment.Heel blood collection skill evaluation form was filled out by the researcher.As a post-test, the student was asked to fill out the Introductory Information Form, Self-Efficacy Scale and State and Trait Anxiety Scales surveys.

    Behavioral: Heel blood collection in a newborn simulation model

  • No intervention
    control group

    They took heel blood on a newborn model in the simulation room as routine training.

Interventions

  • BehavioralHeel blood collection in a newborn simulation model

    The person who will take heel blood in the newborn simulation model can prepare the materials. Firstly, the blood sample can fill in all the information on the filter paper. Knows where the baby's face should be. It can determine the area where a heel blood sample can be taken.It can gently warm the heel area for a few minutes. The area can be cleaned with alcoholic preparation (cotton/swab, etc.). He can squeeze the heel with his thumb and index finger in front. The other 3 fingers can be rubbed at the back. May stroke the heel three times. The heel can be pierced once with a lancet at a suitable location. He can relax his hand. He can wipe away the first drop of blood. It can create a large thick drop of blood to be collected on filter paper. It can make the drop fill the entire ring on the filter paper with one touch. After the procedure is completed, the heel can be pressed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Skill checklist

    The heel prick skill (20 tasks/step) is based on checklists for evaluating student management, recommendations of the Ministry of Health and WHO, and training materials and guides prepared by the Ministry of Health. Each task/step was evaluated as "outstanding" if performed completely and correctly, and as "needs improvement" if performed incompletely and incorrectly. Needs improvement is rated as 1 point, sufficient as 2 points. As a result of the skill checklist, the lowest score is 1 and the highest score is 40

    Time frame: during the intervention

  2. State and Trait Anxiety Scales

    It is used to determine state and trait anxiety levels in individuals. State-Trait Anxiety Scale consists of a total of 40 items, 20 items each. The State Anxiety Scale requires the individual to describe how he or she feels at a particular moment and under certain circumstances. The total score of the scale varies between 20-80. A high score from the scale indicates a high level of anxiety, and a low score indicates a low level of anxiety.

    Time frame: one hour before and one hour after interventions

  3. Self-Efficacy Scale

    The scale was developed to determine behavior and behavioral changes. The scale consisting of 23 items is a 5-point Likert type self-evaluation scale. It includes the options 1-"does not describe me at all", 2-"describes me a little", 3-"undecided", 4-"describes me well", 5-"describes me very well" and the score given for each item is taken as basis. Scores between 23 and 115 are obtained from the scale. A minimum of 23 and a maximum of 115 points can be obtained from the entire scale. A high total score from the scale indicates that the individual's perception of SEM is at a good level.

    Time frame: one hour before and one hour after interventions

  4. Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Questionnaire

    It evaluates student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. The total number of items is 12. The scale is a 5-point Likert type and consists of the subscales "Satisfaction with Current Learning" and "Self-Confidence in Learning". The satisfaction with current learning subscale consists of 5 items, the self-confidence in learning subscale consists of 7 items, and there are no negative items. The sum of the subdimensions of the scale does not give the total score. Scale scores; It is obtained by dividing the sum of the sub-dimensions by the number of items. As the total score from the scale increases, student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning also increases.

    Time frame: one month after intervention

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery
    Manisa, 45140, Turkey
  • Yonca çiçek okuyan
    Manisa, 45140, Turkey
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06373874
Lead sponsor
Celal Bayar University
Responsible party
Yonca Çiçek Okuyan (Celal Bayar University, Midwifery Department, Research Assistant Dr., Manisa Celal Bayar University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
May 30, 2023
Completion
May 30, 2023
Last update
Apr 18, 2024

Study contacts

Yonca çiçek okuyan, PhD
principal investigator · Manisa Celal Bayar University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion