ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06368453Updated Jul 11, 2025

A Study to Evaluate the Performance, Usability, and Result Interpretation of INSTI® HIV Self-Test

An interventional study of INSTI® HIV Self-Test in Human Immunodeficiency Virus I Infection and Human Immunodeficiency Virus II Infection, sponsored by bioLytical Laboratories. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-11.

Sponsored by bioLytical Laboratories · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,728
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance, usability, and result interpretation of the INSTI® HIV Self-Test (referred to INSTI® HIV ST) in the intended use population across the United States (US). The INSTI® HIV Self-Test is a single use in vitro test that is used as a self-test for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human fingerstick blood. This study is designed to evaluate INSTI® HIV ST performance in the hands of non-professionals and untrained lay users who are inexperienced in HIV blood-based self-testing.

The study aims to:

To evaluate the clinical performance (i.e., diagnostic sensitivity and specificity) of the INSTI® HIV Self-Test in a lay user population.

To assess the user's comprehension of the INSTI® HIV ST results (e.g., interpreting positive, negative, and invalid results).

To evaluate the usability of the INSTI® HIV ST and understand users' experience in performing the test.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance, usability, and result interpretation of the INSTI® HIV Self-Test (referred to INSTI® HIV ST) in the intended user population across the United States (US). This study is designed to evaluate INSTI® HIV ST performance in the hands of non-professionals and untrained lay users who are inexperienced in HIV self-testing.

The study aims to:

To evaluate the clinical performance (i.e., diagnostic sensitivity and specificity) of the INSTI® HIV ST in a lay user population.

To assess the user's comprehension of the INSTI® HIV ST results (e.g., interpreting positive, negative, and invalid results).

To evaluate the usability of the INSTI® HIV ST and understand users' experience in performing the test.

Subjects will be consecutively enrolled from the 'general' population (i.e., "all comers" group of previously undiagnosed HIV individuals) until a minimum of 27 HIV positive and 1000-1700 HIV negatives are obtained. Subjects will be lay users recruited at multiple sites across the US. This study is to determine if lay users, unassisted, can perform the INSTI® HIV ST correctly and without significant risk of incorrect results. The study will help to determine if the INSTI® HIV ST instructions are easy to understand for the US public. The overall study processes include a performance evaluation, where subjects will perform the INSTI® HIV ST, a mock results interpretation study to assess the user's comprehension of the INSTI® HIV ST results and usability evaluation to understand users experience with the INSTI® HIV ST. Only a subset of the enrolled subjects (500 subjects) will participate in the mock results interpretation study and usability evaluation.

For the performance evaluation, subjects will perform the INSTI® HIV ST without any intervention from an observer. Following the subjects self-testing, an operator will collect an additional fingerstick sample to perform a comparator test. The positive and negative percent agreement (i.e., PPA and NPA) between the INSTI® HIV ST result and comparator will be calculated. In the event of discrepant results between the INSTI® HIV ST and comparator test, an additional venous blood sample will be collected from the subject for discrepancy testing.

A subset of the enrolled subjects will then participate in the mock results interpretation study and usability evaluation. For the mock study, the subjects will be presented with 5 mock INSTI® HIV ST devices with different results, and the subject's interpretation of each device will be recorded. The percentage of subjects who interpreted the mock results correctly for each result type will be calculated.

For the INSTI® HIV ST usability evaluation, the subjects will be presented with a questionnaire. The overall results of the questionnaire will be used to determine the percentage of subjects who found the INSTI® HIV ST easy to use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus I Infection
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus II Infection

Keywords

  • HIV Self Test
  • INSTI HIV Self test
  • HIV-1/2 Antibody Test
  • In-Home HIV test
03

In context

Lead sponsor

bioLytical Laboratories is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Operator/study staff must complete the subject's Enrolment Questionnaire
  • Subject to sign and date the Form
  • Able to complete the required testing on the allocated testing day(s).
  • Able to speak/ read/write English or Spanish
  • Willingness to provide the fingerstick blood sample and if necessary, the volume of whole blood collected through venous blood draw (approximately 7 ml)
  • Willingness to participate in the study site's standard of care counselling and testing program and receive the study site's standard of care test results
  • Unknown HIV Status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has participated in any prior, or concurrent trial of self-tests
  • Is a practicing medical healthcare professional (doctor, nurse or HIV Counsellor that performs HIV testing with Rapid Tests)
  • Is currently on a PrEP regimen
  • Has used a Rapid Diagnostic Test for HIV blood-based self-testing previously
  • Has received any experimental HIV vaccine
  • Has a bleeding disorder
  • Is known HIV+
  • Uses Anti-Retroviral medication
  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the Operator, would make the participant unsuitable or unsafe for enrolment or could interfere with the completion of the assessment, consent form and questionnaire etc. or bias the outcome, i.e., being unable to see / read by forgetting to bring reading glasses, being intoxicated or acute sickness, or visibly distressed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
1,728 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Performance

    INSTI® HIV ST devices are provided to the enrolled participants to conduct the self test using the provided instruction for use while being observed by an operator. The operator records the INSTI® HIV ST results interpreted by the subjects. The operator then performs the comparator test to compare the results with the INSTI® HIV ST.

    Device: INSTI® HIV Self-Test

  • No intervention
    Mock results interpretation study and Usability evaluation

    A subset of the enrolled subjects (500 subjects) will participate in the mock results interpretation study and usability evaluation. For the mock study, the subjects will be presented with 5 mock INSTI® HIV ST devices with different results, and the subject's interpretation of each device will be recorded. The percentage of subjects who interpreted the mock results correctly for each result type will be calculated. For the INSTI® HIV ST usability evaluation, the subjects will be presented with a questionnaire. The overall results of the questionnaire will be used to determine the percentage of subjects who found the INSTI® HIV ST easy to use.

Interventions

  • DeviceINSTI® HIV Self-Test

    Each participant will be provided with the INSTI® HIV Self-Test and asked to conduct self testing. The operator will observe the participant and record the subject's interpretation of the results. Subjects will perform the test without intervention from the operator. The operator will then perform the comparator test and collect a fingerstick blood sample. In the event of a discrepant result between the INSTI® HIV ST and comparator test, an additional venous blood sample will be collected from the subject and sent for discrepancy testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical sensitivity and specificity of the INSTI® HIV Self-Test

    The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) between the INSTI® HIV ST and comparator test will be determined. The two-sided confidence interval for the PPA and NPA will be determined. The percentage of assays with INSTI® HIV ST invalid results will be determined.

    Time frame: 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The INSTI® HIV Self-Test usability and result interpretation

    The percentage of subjects who interpreted the INSTI® HIV ST mock results correctly for each result type will be determined. The usability questionnaire will be used to determine the following: The percentage of subjects who found the INSTI® HIV ST easy to use. The percentage of subjects who found the INSTI® HIV ST product information easy to use. The percentage of subjects willing to use the INSTI® HIV ST again The percentage of subjects willing to recommend the INSTI® HIV ST

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Therafirst Medical Center
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2024 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 8 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2024
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
StartActual
May 2, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jan 8, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 8, 2025
Last update
Jul 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06368453
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
Start date
May 2, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 8, 2025
Completion
Jan 8, 2025
Last update
Jul 11, 2025

Study contacts

Steven A Geller
principal investigator · Centennial Medical Group
Anthony LaMarca
principal investigator · Therafirst Medical Centers Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion