CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06348680Updated Feb 25, 2025

The Effect of Video-assisted Episiotomy Repair Training on Anxiety and Self-efficacy Levels in Midwifery Students

An interventional study of Video assisted episiotomy repair training in Episiotomy Wound, sponsored by Amasya University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-25.

Sponsored by Amasya University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of midwifery undergraduate education is; To provide students with basic professional knowledge, skills and attitudes in cognitive, affective and psychomotor dimensions. Various practices are used to provide students with midwifery skills. Case studies, maintenance processes, laboratory applications, field studies, simulation application and video monitoring are some of these applications. Each of these approaches, which are especially preferred in applied courses, has an important place in increasing students' self-efficacy and reducing their anxiety. Episiotomy is one of the obstetric interventions that negatively affects the self-efficacy of midwifery students and causes anxiety. Midwives are responsible for performing and caring for episiotomy. In many countries, episiotomy repair training is given to midwifery students using sponges or models. However, today the use of calf tongue, which is very similar to perineal tissue, has become widespread. There are a limited number of studies in the literature using calf tongue simulation. These studies suggested that the practice improved the skills of midwifery students. No study has been found in the literature using video-assisted episiotomy repair training.

Read the detailed description

Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical interventions in normal vaginal birth. Episiotomy, also known as perineotomy, can be defined as an incision made in the perineum to ensure easy delivery of the fetus, shorten the active phase of labor, prevent lacerations, and protect the perineal tissue and anal sphincter. This procedure is a surgical intervention applied to the bulbo-cavernos muscle located in the perineum in the second phase of labor. It can be said that episiotomy has become widespread as a result of medicalization in birth, as in all areas of health. In particular, moving births from homes to hospital environments can be cited as one of the leading reasons for the increase in episiotomy rates. Routine episiotomy may cause pelvic organ prolapse and damage the muscles in the anal sphincters and perineal structure. In addition, studies on the subject have shown that episiotomy may be associated with problems such as postpartum pain, dyspareunia and incontinence. It is also known that the rate of perineal trauma is high in countries where episiotomy is frequently performed. For this reason, episiotomy, which is basically done to prevent uncontrolled damage that may occur in the perineal area, is not routinely preferred today. The recommendation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) regarding episiotomy is as follows: Episiotomy may be preferred in cases of risk arising from the mother or the baby, such as protecting against perineal tears that may occur in the mother during vaginal birth, facilitating or accelerating birth, but its use should be limited in cases where it is not necessary.

Self-efficacy is defined as the individual's beliefs about his ability to perform significantly in events that will affect his life. Self-efficacy perception determines how individuals feel, think, motivate themselves and behave. It is known that motivation increases as the level of self-efficacy increases). It has also been reported that individuals with high self-efficacy have a higher potential to cope with problems, experience less stress and anxiety, and make more effort to achieve their desired results. It is estimated that people with low self-efficacy often experience stress, anxiety and depression, and their academic and social success decreases. As a matter of fact, some studies have found that the academic performance of university students increases in parallel with their self-efficacy score averages.

The goal of midwifery undergraduate education is; To provide students with basic professional knowledge, skills and attitudes in cognitive, affective and psychomotor dimensions. Various practices are used to provide students with midwifery skills. Case studies, maintenance processes, laboratory applications, field studies, simulation application and video monitoring are some of these applications. Each of these approaches, which are especially preferred in applied courses, has an important place in increasing students' self-efficacy and reducing their anxiety. Episiotomy is one of the obstetric interventions that negatively affects the self-efficacy of midwifery students and causes anxiety. Midwives are responsible for performing and caring for episiotomy. In many countries, episiotomy repair training is given to midwifery students using sponges or models. However, today the use of calf tongue, which is very similar to perineal tissue, has become widespread. There are a limited number of studies in the literature using calf tongue simulation. These studies suggested that the practice improved the skills of midwifery students. No study has been found in the literature using video-assisted episiotomy repair training.

02

Conditions studied

  • Episiotomy Wound

Keywords

  • Episiotomy
  • Self-efficacy
  • Midwifery Students
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Amasya University is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Midwifery students who are studying in the 3rd year, have taken the normal birth and postpartum period course and are registered for the risky birth and postpartum period course
  • Those who volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who did not agree to participate in the research
  • Those who have an active working life as midwives
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Standard episiotomy repair training will be given to the students in the experimental group using the calf tongue simulator. After the theoretical phase is completed, the implementation phase will begin. During the application period (practical phase), students in this group will be shown a 'video recording' of episiotomy repair prepared by the researchers as educational material. Thus, students in the experimental group will be able to watch episiotomy repairs whenever and however many times they want, in addition to researcher support throughout the application, and improve their application skills.

    Other: Video assisted episiotomy repair training

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Students in the control group will be given standard episiotomy repair training using the calf tongue simulator. After the theoretical phase is completed, the implementation phase will begin. Researcher support will be provided throughout the implementation period.

Interventions

  • OtherVideo assisted episiotomy repair training

    Midwifery Intervention The 'video recording' prepared by researchers specialized in the field of midwifery to increase the episiotomy repair skills of midwifery students will be used as training material. The content of the video recording is as follows: control before episiotomy repair, episiotomy repair, subcutaneous suturing, skin suturing, suturing techniques (Continuous, Simple Intermittent, Mattress). After the video recording is completed, it will be restarted and shown to the students in the experimental group continuously throughout the application period. At the end of the application period, students will be re-evaluated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. State Anxiety Scale

    Scoring is as follows: "1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=A lot and 4=Completely." There are two types of expressions in the scale: direct and reverse. Items 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20 are scored in reverse. Direct expressions express negative emotions; Inverted expressions contain positive emotions. The scores obtained from the scale theoretically range between 20 and 80. High scores from the scale indicate high anxiety level, low scores indicate low anxiety level.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale

    The scale consists of 19 items and two subscales: 'episiotomy preparation and application' and 'episiotomy control'. For each item on the Likert-type scale, "1" is given for the "strongly disagree" response, "2" is given for the "disagree" response, "3" is given for the "agree" response, and "4" is given for the "strongly agree" response. There are no reverse coded items in the scale. The total score varies between 19 and 76. High scores from the scale indicate a high level of self-efficacy for episiotomy skills.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Amasya University
    Amasya, Center 05000, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06348680
Lead sponsor
Amasya University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 5, 2024
Start date
Mar 25, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2024
Completion
May 15, 2024
Last update
Feb 25, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion