An interventional study of Oro Tracheal Intubation by DL and Oro Tracheal Intubation by VL in To Compare Success Rate of Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy, sponsored by Patan Academy of Health Sciences. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-11.
Sponsored by Patan Academy of Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This is an open-label, single center, prospective, randomized, comparative, intervention study.
The goal of this study is to compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy for first pass oro tracheal intubation. The other question it aims to answer are:
All consecutive patients presenting in Emergency medicine room requiring intubation, will be recruited in this study after taking informed written consent from the patients' family, excluding those falling in exclusion criteria. Direct laryngoscopy will be done by Mackintosh Laryngoscope with blade no 3 or 4. Video Laryngoscopy will be done by Mcgrath Mac Video Laryngoscope in respective groups. Intubations will be done by ER physicians and Emergency fellows of Emergency department. The total number of required sample size will be calculated and the obtained number will be divided in a group of 21 with block of 6 each. After randomizing the group and the block from a computerized software, a total of 21 envelope will be prepared in a consecutive manner and the patient will be intubated as per the pre decided blocks. All the patients in emergency who require intubation and falling into the inclusion criteria will be assessed. Informed written consent will be taken from the patient's family explaining that they will be a part of study and either of the laryngoscopy method will be used in them. Informed consent will be taken by one of the investigators, (ER physicians and emergency medicine fellow) who will be performing intubations in them.Inclusion criteria-
Exclusion criteria-
Randomization-
A total of 63 patients in each arm with total 126 patients will be included in the study. Blocks of 6 will be taken with total 21 groups. With using the software, random group will be selected and intubations will be done accordingly.
Demographic and clinical profile of patients in both arms will be recorded. Two treatment arms-
Outcomes Primary- First pass success of direct laryngoscopy in oro tracheal intubation First pass success of video laryngoscopy in oro tracheal intubation
Secondary- Complications rates between two methods. Use of alternative methods for ventilation or oxygenation between two methods Better visualization of Cormack-Lehane grading between two methods
Patan Academy of Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
All participants who are intubated from Direct laryngoscopy is enrolled in this arm.
Device: Oro Tracheal Intubation by DL
All participants who are intubated from Video laryngoscopy is enrolled in this arm.
Device: Oro Tracheal Intubation by VL
DL
VL
First pass success of direct laryngoscopy in oro tracheal intubation
success of oro tracheal intubation during DL
Time frame: 1 year
First pass success of video laryngoscopy in oro tracheal intubation
success of oro tracheal intubation during VL
Time frame: 1 year
Complications rates between two methods.
rate of complication during intubation via DL or VL will be noted
Time frame: 1 year
Use of alternative methods for ventilation or oxygenation between two methods
use of alternative methods during intubation via DL or VL will be noted
Time frame: 1 year
Better visualization of Cormack-Lehane grading between two methods
better visualization of cormack lehane grading during intubation via DL or VL will be noted
Time frame: 1 year
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Patan Academy of Health Sciences