ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06320899Updated Jun 25, 2024

Mid- or High-flex Rods Versus Low-flex Rods of SpineShape System IV for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases

An interventional study of SpineShape System IV straight rod elastic and SpineShape System IV straight rod medium in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Facet Joint Arthrosis and Spondylarthritis, sponsored by SpineSave AG. Recruiting at 2 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-25.

Sponsored by SpineSave AG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this multi-center, randomized, clinical study is to show that the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine with high- or mid-flex rods is not inferior to the treatment with low-flex rods in terms of clinical and safety-related results.

The primary aim is to compare the reduction in back pain after the treatment with high- or mid-flex rods with that after treatment with low-flex rods. Secondary, the functionality after treatment with high- or mid-flex rods will be compared to that after treatment with low-flex rods.

Read the detailed description

Dynamic stabilization systems for the lumbar spine are no novelty. The SpineShape System IV builds on the experience of previous systems and attempts to provide additional benefits primarily through three different and relatively elastic rod stiffnesses. 126 subjects with degenerative symptoms in 1 to 2 segments of the lumbar spine L1 to S1 will be recruited. The participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo implantation of either the elastic (experimental product group 1), medium (experimental product group 2) or stiff rod (comparison product group).

The aim of the study is to show that the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine with elastic or medium rod variants is not inferior to treatment with hard rods in terms of clinical and safety-related results. This is checked by completing a questionnaire before the surgical procedure and 3 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months after the surgical procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
  • Facet Joint Arthrosis
  • Spondylarthritis
  • Discopathy
  • Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
  • Instability Lumbar Spine

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spondylarthritis

202 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylarthritis; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 126 is above the median of 107 across 105 interventional studies indexed under Spondylarthritis.

Browse Spondylarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with SpineSave AG as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • degenerative symptoms in 1 to 2 segments in the lumbar spine L1-S1
  • signed of participant
  • confirmation of the participant that the attendance of follow-up visits are intended
  • Body-Mass-Index \< 32
  • Pedicle screw axis distance \< 30mm
  • one or more of the following indications:

    • (dynamic) stenosis in the spinal canal
    • neuroforaminal stenosis
    • facet joint syndrome / spondylarthrosis
    • discopathy (recurrent disc hernia)
    • degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding \<1)
    • instability (hypermobility with antelishtesis, hypomobility with retrolisthesis if decompressed)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • missing bone structure, e.g. due to congenital anomalies or sever anatomical deformities that make anchoring of the implant impossible
  • damaged structural tissue, e.g. due to a bone fracture
  • application to the thoracic or cervical spine
  • pronounced idiopathic scoliosis
  • spondylolisthesis > Meyerding grad 1
  • isthmic spondolylysis
  • bone tumor
  • osteochondrosis modic type I, II or III
  • osteoporosis, which could impair screw anchoring
  • history with third party implants
  • patients with an active local or systemic infection
  • known allergy to titatnium alloys
  • skeleton in growth (epiphyseal joints not closed)
  • severe muscular neuronal or vascular disease
  • immunosuppresive therapy
  • long-term therapy with cortisone
  • heavy smokers (regular consumption of more than six cigarettes per day), drug addicts and alcoholics
  • chronic pain patients
  • incapable of judgment or emergency situation
  • implantation during pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SpineShape System IV straight rod elastic

    Dynamic stabilization of lumbar segments using SpineShape System IV straight rod elastic (high-flex)

    Device: SpineShape System IV straight rod elastic

  • Experimental
    SpineShape System IV straight rod medium

    Dynamic stabilization of lumbar segments using SpineShape System IV straight rod medium (mid-flex)

    Device: SpineShape System IV straight rod medium

  • Active comparator
    SpineShape System IV straight rod stiff

    Dynamic stabilization of lumbar segments using SpineShape System IV straight rod stiff (low-flex)

    Device: SpineShape System IV straight rod stiff

Interventions

  • DeviceSpineShape System IV straight rod elastic

    Implantation of SpineShape System IV straight rod elastic

  • DeviceSpineShape System IV straight rod medium

    Implantation of SpineShape System IV straight rod medium (mid-flex)

  • DeviceSpineShape System IV straight rod stiff

    Implantation of SpineShape System IV straight rod stiff (low-flex)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) lower back pain

    self reported back pain intensity using Visual Analogue Scale system. 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain"

    Time frame: 24 months post-implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) leg pain

    self reported leg pain intensity using Visual Analogue Scale system. 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain"

    Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 60 months post-implantation

  2. walking duration

    self reported walking duration in 5 categories (0-5 min, 6-15 min, 16-30 min, 31-60 min and \>60min)

    Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 60 months post-implantation

  3. medication consumption

    use of none, mild pain medication, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and/or antidepressiva documented in patient's health records

    Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 60 months post-implantation

  4. adverse events

    adverse events related to the device (e.g. screw loosening, screw breakage, torn rod, slipped rod or too short rod)

    Time frame: after 3, 12, 24, 60 months post-implantation

  5. segmental mobility index level

    measuring the segmental mobility at index level to verify the preservation of the mobility. an average mobility per segment of \>1° is considered a success

    Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 60 months post-implantation

  6. ability to work/ activity (for retirees)

    self reported ability to work or activity (for retirees) in 5 categories (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%)

    Time frame: 3, 12, 24, 60 months post-implantation

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Spital Aarberg
    Aarberg, 3270, Switzerland
    Recruiting
    • Cathrein · Contactdorsomed@hin.ch · +41323668484
    • Philipp Cathrein, Dr. · Principal investigator
  • Hirslanden Klinik Linde
    Biel, 2501, Switzerland
    Recruiting
    • Cathrein · Contactdorsomed@hin.ch · +41323668484
    • Philipp Cathrein, Dr. · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2031, 86 months after the start.

Of 46 interventional studies with no phase under Spondylarthritis, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 77. This study's planned 86 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2024
First posted
Mar 20, 2024
StartActual
Jun 4, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2031
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2031
Last update
Jun 25, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06320899
Lead sponsor
SpineSave AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2024
Start date
Jun 4, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2024

Study contacts

Sarah Abramovic
Contact
sarah.abramovic@spinesave.com
+41448669280
Philipp Cathrein, Dr.med.
principal investigator · Hirslanden Klinik Linde

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion