An interventional study of PTMC Dermal Filler in Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Fold, sponsored by Aqpha Medical B.V.. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 67 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-18.
Sponsored by Aqpha Medical B.V. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the safety and performance of the PTMC Dermal filler for treating moderate to severe nasolabial folds in adult men and women.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
This is the only study on the registry with Aqpha Medical B.V. as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
All participants will receive PTMC Dermal Filler.
Device: PTMC Dermal Filler
A total of 120 subjects will receive treatment with PTMC Dermal Filler. The volume of filler injected will vary depending on the severity of the nasolabial fold. Injections will be administered by the investigator at the beginning of the study, with the injection technique, plane, and volume recorded. Touch-up treatments are permitted at the 1-month follow-up visit, if necessary.
Nasolabial fold severity
The nasolabial fold severity is measured using the Wrinkles Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) by the investigator.
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
Safety (Adverse events)
Safety is assessed by the collection of adverse events (incidence and severity), and through subject assessment of injection site responses (ISRs) up to 4 weeks after treatment.
Time frame: until 18 months after treatment
Nasolabial fold severity
Mean change from baseline of the nasolabial fold severity measured using the WSRS by the investigator.
Time frame: 1, 3, 9, 12, and 18 months after treatment
Responder rate
Number of subjects having at least 1-point improvement in the WSRS score compared to the baseline.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after treatment
Overall aesthetic improvement (by the investigator)
Overall aesthetic improvement is assessed by the investigator using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after treatment
Overall aesthetic improvement (by the subject)
Overall aesthetic improvement assessed by the subject using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after treatment
Subject satisfaction
Subject satisfaction is measured using a FACE-Q questionnaire.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after treatment
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
Evaluation of pain by the participant using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: After each injection and at the 2-weeks follow-up visit
Treatment satisfaction
Treatment satisfaction evaluated by the subject using a questionnaire.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after treatment
Ease of use
Ease of use of the device evaluated by the investigator using a questionnaire.
Time frame: After injection of the device on day 0
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.