CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06307288Updated Mar 12, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of Tranilast Combined With Minocycline in the Treatment of Rosacea

A Phase 4 interventional study of minocycline and tranilast in Rosacea, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-12.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathogenesis involving multiple factors. Currently, the treatment of rosacea remains highly challenging. Mast cells, as key participants in the pathogenesis of rosacea, have been shown to alleviate rosacea symptoms with some topical, oral, and injectable mast cell stabilizers in recent years. Tranilast stabilizes mast cells and basophils by acting on their cell membranes and preventing their degranulation. Tranilast has been used in the treatment of various skin disease, such as hypertrophic scars and atopic dermatitis. Minocycline is a first-line treatment for rosacea, and low-dose minocycline treatment (50mg/day) is believed to have anti-inflammatory effects without antibacterial effects, thus minimizing the dysbiosis and bacterial resistance caused by antibiotic use. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combining mast cell stabilizer tranilast with low-dose minocycline treatment for rosacea, providing new treatment options and insights for rosacea patients.

Read the detailed description

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathogenesis involving multiple factors. Currently, the treatment of rosacea remains highly challenging. In the skin, mast cells are located in the dermis near nerve endings and blood vessels, playing a crucial role in inflammatory responses. Mast cells, as key participants in the pathogenesis of rosacea, have been shown to alleviate rosacea symptoms with some topical, oral, and injectable mast cell stabilizers in recent years. Tranilast stabilizes mast cells and basophils by acting on their cell membranes and preventing their degranulation. Tranilast has been used in the treatment of various skin disease, such as hypertrophic scars and atopic dermatitis. Minocycline is a first-line treatment for rosacea, and low-dose minocycline treatment (50mg/day) is believed to have anti-inflammatory effects without antibacterial effects, thus minimizing the dysbiosis and bacterial resistance caused by antibiotic use. However, there is currently a lack of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with tranilast and minocycline for rosacea. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combining mast cell stabilizer tranilast with low-dose minocycline treatment for rosacea, providing new treatment options and insights for rosacea patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rosacea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rosacea
  • mast cell stabilizers
  • tranilast
  • minocycline
  • treatment
  • clinical research
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and nonpregnant females, aged 18-60 years old;
  2. Diagnosed with erythematotelangiectatic or papulopustular rosacea, with an investigator' s global assessment of 3-5;
  3. Patients with good cognitive function and normal mental status;
  4. Patients with good communication skills;
  5. Voluntary participation in the study and signing of informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to any component of tranilast capsules;
  2. Allergy to any component of minocycline capsules;
  3. History of systemic medication for rosacea treatment within the past month;
  4. Pregnancy or lactation;
  5. Presence of severe primary diseases in addition to rosacea, such as cardiovascular system, cerebrovascular system, digestive system, urinary system, hematopoietic system diseases, or systemic failure.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    minocycline treatment group

    The patient was treated with oral minocycline capsules, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.

    Drug: minocycline

  • Experimental
    tranilast treatment group

    The patient was treated with oral tranilast capsules, 0.1g each time, three times a day, for 12 weeks.

    Drug: tranilast

  • Experimental
    tranilast combined with minocycline treatment group

    The patient was treated with oral tranilast capsules, 0.1g each time, three times a day; oral minocycline capsules, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.

    Drug: minocycline · Drug: tranilast

Interventions

  • Drugminocycline

    The patient was treated with oral minocycline, 50mg each time, once a day, for 12 weeks.

  • Drugtranilast

    The patient was treated with oral tranilast, 0.1g each time, three times a day, for 12 weeks.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. lesion counts

    The counts of skin lesions, including papules, pustules, and papulopustules, was used to evaluate the changes of facial inflammatory skin lesions before and after treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

  2. Clinician's Erythema Assessment score

    The name of the scale is Clinician's Erythema Assessment. It was used to evaluate the change of persistent facial erythema before and after treatment. The score on the Clinician's Erythema Assessment scale ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe persistent erythema on the patient's face.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

  3. Global Flushing Severity Scale score

    The name of the scale is Global Flushing Severity Scale. It was used to evaluate the change of facial flushing symptoms before and after treatment. The score on the Global Flushing Severity Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of facial flushing.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

  4. Global Acne Grading System score

    The name of the scale is Global Acne Grading System. It was used to evaluate the changes of facial inflammatory skin lesions before and after treatment. The Global Acne Grading System score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating more inflammatory lesions on the patient's face.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. patient satisfaction evaluation

    Patient satisfaction was evaluated as very satisfied, satisfied, relatively satisfied and dissatisfied.

    Time frame: week 12

  2. melanin index

    Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the melanin index on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

  3. erythema index

    Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the erythema index on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

  4. transepidermal water loss

    Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the transepidermal water loss on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.

    Time frame: From enrollment to week 12

  5. Dermatology Life Quality Index score

    The name of the scale is Dermatology Life Quality Index. It was used to assess the changes in quality of life before and after treatment. The Dermatology Life Quality Index score ranges from 0 to 29, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of the disease on the patient's quality of life.

    Time frame: week 0 and12

06

Study locations

1 site
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong Universi
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000, China
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Marchitto MC, Chien AL. Mast Cell Stabilizers in the Treatment of Rosacea: A Review of Existing and Emerging Therapies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1541-1549. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00597-7. Epub 2021 Sep 2. PubMed 34476755 ↗
  • Aroni K, Tsagroni E, Kavantzas N, Patsouris E, Ioannidis E. A study of the pathogenesis of rosacea: how angiogenesis and mast cells may participate in a complex multifactorial process. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008 Mar;300(3):125-31. doi: 10.1007/s00403-007-0816-z. Epub 2007 Dec 11. PubMed 18071725 ↗
  • Wozniak E, Owczarczyk-Saczonek A, Lange M, Czarny J, Wygonowska E, Placek W, Nedoszytko B. The Role of Mast Cells in the Induction and Maintenance of Inflammation in Selected Skin Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;24(8):7021. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087021. PubMed 37108184 ↗
  • Del Rosso JQ, Webster G, Weiss JS, Bhatia ND, Gold LS, Kircik L. Nonantibiotic Properties of Tetracyclines in Rosacea and Their Clinical Implications. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;14(8):14-21. Epub 2021 Aug 1. PubMed 34840653 ↗
  • Schaller M, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, Cribier B, Del Rosso J, Dlova NC, Gallo RL, Granstein RD, Kautz G, Mannis MJ, Micali G, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Tanghetti E, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Zierhut M, van Zuuren EJ, Tan J. Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel. Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1269-1276. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18420. Epub 2019 Oct 16. PubMed 31392722 ↗
  • Tan J, Almeida LM, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Gallo R, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren EJ, Schaller M. Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15122. Epub 2017 Jan 23. PubMed 27718519 ↗
  • Schaller M, Almeida LM, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren E, Tan J. Rosacea treatment update: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):465-471. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15173. Epub 2017 Feb 5. PubMed 27861741 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06307288
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Responsible party
Weihui Zeng (Professor, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2024
Start date
Oct 16, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2024

Study contacts

Weihui Zeng
study chair · Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion