CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06296303Updated Mar 6, 2024

Effect of Pulsed Magnetic Therapy Versus Phonophoresis in Discogenic Lumbar Radiculopathy Patients

An interventional study of Pulsed electromagnetic therapy and Ultrasound phonophoresis in Lumbar Radiculopathy, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-06.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purposes of the study

To investigate the effect of pulsed magnetic therapy versus phonophoresis in discogenic lumbar radiculopathy patients

Read the detailed description

Patients will be randomized into either pulsed magnetic therapy group or phonophoresis group. Patients will receive the intervention for six weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Radiculopathy

Browse trials for

03

In context

Radiculopathy

488 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiculopathy; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Radiculopathy.

Browse Radiculopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient age ranges from 20 -45
  • Unilateral chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy
  • Intervertebral disc herniation confirmed by MRI
  • one of the following :

    1. H- reflex amplitude side to side difference 0.67 in absence of latency difference.
    2. H- reflex amplitude side to side difference smaller than 0.5 in p of latency difference.

    3 - Side to side H- reflex latency difference more than 1 msec. 4- Prolonged H-reflex latency more than 30 msec.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systematic disease
  • Lumbar canal stenosis
  • Pervious surgeries
  • Scoliosis
  • Kyphosis
  • Spinal fracture
  • Bilateral symptoms
  • Steroid injection
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pulsed electromagnetic therapy group

    Patients in this group will receive Pulsed electromagnetic therapy + Conventional physical therapy

    Other: Pulsed electromagnetic therapy · Other: Conventional physical therapy

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound phonophoresis group

    Patients in this group will receive Ultrasound phonophoresis + Conventional physical therapy

    Other: Ultrasound phonophoresis · Other: Conventional physical therapy

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Patients in this group will receive Conventional physical therapy

    Other: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

  • OtherPulsed electromagnetic therapy

    Pulsed etromagnetic therapy (1000 gauss) on sciatic nerve in gluteal fold. ( 30 min )

  • OtherUltrasound phonophoresis

    Phonophoresis using dexamethasone and topical diclofenac sodium gel on sciatic nerve in subgluteal fold and mid thigh

  • OtherConventional physical therapy

    Conventional physical therapy consisting of 1. IF current on lumbar spine. (15 min ) 2. Hotpack on lumbar spine . (15 min ) 3. Neurodynamic mobilization . 4. Mobilization and manipulation for lumbar spine. 5. Exercises

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain

    Visual analogue scale

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain and function at 6 weeks

  2. Disability

    Oswestry disability index

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain and function at 6 weeks

  3. Sciatic nerve cross sectional area

    Diagnostic Ultrasound

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain and function at 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. H-reflex amplitude

    by EMG unit

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain and function at 6 weeks

  2. H-reflex side-to-side amplitude (H/H) ratio

    by EMG unit

    Time frame: Change from Baseline pain and function at 6 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06296303
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Mohamed Badr Hassanein (MSc, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2024
Start date
Mar 3, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2024

Study contacts

Mohamed Badr Hassanein, MSc
Contact
10722016464064@pg.cu.edu.eg
+20 114 225 3884

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion