CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06278636LUXAUpdated Feb 26, 2024

Laparoscopic Ultrasound Examination: Analysis of Feasibility

An observational study in Gynecologic Cancer and Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-26.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a prospective cohort study to assess the feasibility of the laparoscopic ultrasound examination, directly by surgeons, during minimally invasive gynaecological surgery.

The secondary aims are to examine the learning curve for laparoscopic ultrasound examination and the performance score in obtaining high quality ultrasound images of anatomical parameters by a team of 5 gynecological laparoscopic fellows. The patients' medical history and symptoms will also be recorded to define whether these clinical data can influence the failure rate. With advanced technology, the conventional workflow can be simplified by using laparoscopic ultrasound probes directly by surgeons, to utilize the hospital resources efficiently and to reduce operating times. In this regard, we would like to demonstrate that the application of laparoscopic examination is feasible and easy to learn by surgeons. This innovative technique could open up multiple diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities for the patient, providing potential clinical information useful to the surgeon.

Read the detailed description

The use of laparoscopic ultrasound is an evolving field with a potentially wide range of advantages that could facilitate complex gynecologic surgical procedures; increasing surgical safety by allowing the surgeon to see beyond the surface of the organ, visualizing anatomical structures and identifying, for example, retroperitoneal recurrences and benign or malignant pelvic lesions, even small and not visible laparoscopically, and consequently improving the surgical accuracy of tumor resection. (10) Gynecologists who are familiar with gynecological transvaginal ultrasound should be able to become proficient in identifying pelvic organs during surgical procedures in order to improve surgical accuracy, reduce complications, and ultimately improve patient care.

Nevertheless, this technique has been slow to be implemented in the clinical setting, perhaps due to the lack of a learning curve. Therefore, training gynecological surgical fellows in recognizing pelvic structures using laparoscopic probes is critical for allows them to use this tool in different application fields, providing them with an important advantage. The training of gynecological surgeons in the use of laparoscopic probes would provide an advantage in terms of surgical time, speeding up the procedures of recognition and removal of target lesions. In addition, by making surgeons autonomous in the operating theatre, the need for an additional ultrasound operator during surgery would be eliminated. These benefits would translate into a potential reduction in cost as well

02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Cancer
  • Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 920 studies on the registry; 529 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Eligible population includes 5 fellow surgeons with EFSUMB level 1 experience of ultrasound in gynecology (11) and 150 women satisfying inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Fellow surgeons with EFSUMB level 1 experience of ultrasound in gynecology.
  • Women affected by gynecological pathologies undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery such as endometrial cancer, cervical cancer at early stage, or benign pathologies.
  • All women will be required to sign written informed consent to enter the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients affected by gynaecological pathologies undergoing emergency surgeries.
  • Refusal to sign written informed consent.
  • Patients with previous hysterectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy.
  • Uterus and adnexa not visualised at LPS examination.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLaparoscopi ultrasound examination

    Analysis of feasibility and fellow surgeons learning curve in minimally invasive gynecological procedures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. feasibility of the laparoscopic

    for to assess the feasibility of the laparoscopic ultrasound examination during minimally invasive gynaecological surgery, achievement of one ultrasound picture in maximum 120 seconds examination during minimally invasive gynaecological surgery, in terms of achievement of one ultrasound picture in maximum 120 seconds

    Time frame: 2 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. the learning curve of fellow surgeons

    To investigate the learning curve of fellow surgeons in obtaining skill competency by using laparoscopic probe

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  2. the performance of fellow surgeons

    To evaluate the performance of fellow surgeons in obtaining high-quality US images of anatomical parameters using expert assessment as the gold standard and in achieving a reduction in the operative time of laparoscopic probe use.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS
    Rome, 00168, Italy
    • Floriana Mascilini, Dr · Contact
    • Antonia Carla Testa, Prof · Contact
    • Floriana Mascilini · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06278636
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Responsible party
Mascilini Floriana (Ph.D, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
Start date
Jul 18, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 26, 2024

Study contacts

Floriana Mascilini
Contact
floriana.mascilini@policlinicogemellli.it
0630156399
Maria Teresa Giudice
Contact
mariateresa.giulia@guest.policlinicogemelli.it
0630156399

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion