ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06270654Updated Feb 21, 2024

Management of Perioperative Pain Using Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Microscopic Lumbar Surgery

An interventional study of Erector spinae plane block and Skin infiltration LA in Lumbar Spine Disease, sponsored by University of Malaya. Recruiting at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-21.

Sponsored by University of Malaya · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare patients receiving bilateral erector spinae block with ropivacaine vs control group in terms of pain score, total opioid consumption, hemodynamic changes intraoperatively, length of hospitalisation , time to ambulation post surgery and quality of recovery.

Read the detailed description

Most open spine surgery exacts a high degree of postsurgical pain due to the incision and muscle dissection of the vertebra. The postoperative pain control and early mobilization improve the quality of the surgical care. Inadequate pain relief might result in perioperative morbidity, resulting in prolonged hospital stays.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block where local anaesthetic is injected in a plane preferably below the erector spinae muscle. It can provide thoracic, abdominal, and even some lower extremity analgesia. It was also theorised that erector spinae plane block can reduce opioid use and provide analgesia for lumbar surgery. The financial cost that is saved by reducing the length of hospital stay, perioperative morbidity will warrant the use of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spine Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spinal Diseases

174 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Diseases; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Diseases.

Browse Spinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Malaya is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-75
  • Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale of 15.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I - II patients
  • Scheduled for elective, open microscopic lumbar surgery (less than 3 levels) under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment
  • Patient refusal
  • Weight\<50kg, >120kg
  • Allergy to local anesthesia
  • Alcohol/ drug abuse
  • Renal failure or liver failure
  • Coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia
  • Chronic pain with chronic opioid usage
  • Ischemic heart disease
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Pre incision of 0.375% ropivacaine 10ml local infiltration will be given.

    Procedure: Skin infiltration LA

  • Experimental
    Ropivacaine group

    Bilateral erector spinae plane block (0.375% 20ml ropivacaine on each side + adrenaline 1:200,000) pre incision.

    Procedure: Erector spinae plane block

Interventions

  • ProcedureErector spinae plane block

    After consent was obtained, patients will be randomised into control group and an intervention group. For patients randomized into the interventional group, bilateral erector spinae plane block will be performed under general anaesthesia in prone position before the operation. An experienced anaesthetist performs this under ultrasound guidance (using curvilinear probe) in a sterile method. After identifying L3 transverse process, 21G Stimuplex needle will be inserted via in-plane method. Once needle placement is confirmed and aspiration is negative, 20ml of ropivacaine 0.375% with adrenaline 1:200,000 dilution will be given on each side.

  • ProcedureSkin infiltration LA

    Pre incision of 0.375% ropivacaine 10ml local infiltration will be given to control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score at recovery, 30mins, 1, 2, 4, 8,12, 24 hours post-surgery

    Measure by numerical rating scale (minimum 1-least pain, maximum 10-most painful)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Total opioid consumption intraoperative

    Measure by total dose consumed (in milligram)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  3. Total opioid consumption post-operative

    Measure by total dose consumed (in milligram)

    Time frame: up to 72 hours

  4. Timing of first rescue dose of iv morphine

    Post operation till time requiring first dose of iv morphine

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. The quality of recovery score (QoR)-15 questionnaire at 24 hours post-operation

    Measure by the quality of recovery score (QoR)-15 questionnaire (minimum of 0,maximum of 150,higher score means a better outcome)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Hemodynamic changes intraoperative

    Blood pressure(measure in mm hg)

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

  3. Hemodynamic changes intraoperative

    heart rate (heart rate measure via heart beats per minute/ECG)

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

  4. Length of hospital stays

    Days of stay in hospital

    Time frame: up to 1 week

  5. Time to ambulation after surgery

    Time from operation till ambulation

    Time frame: up to 1 week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universiti Malaya Medical Centre
    Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan 51100, Malaysia
    Recruiting
    • Wei Keang Tan, M.D. · Contactweikeang@ummc.edu.my · +60126655489
    • Wei Keang Tan, MD. · Principal investigator
    • Tzi Sen Lee, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Dharmendra Ganesan, MBBS, FRCS · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krishnan S, Cascella M. Erector Spinae Plane Block. [Updated 2022 Apr 30]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.
  • Donnally III CJ, Hanna A, Varacallo MA. Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease. 2023 Aug 4. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448134/ PubMed 28846354 ↗
  • Kim HS, Wu PH, Jang IT. Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1: Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Intervertebral Discogenic Pain and Radiofrequency Ablation of Basivertebral and Sinuvertebral Nerve Treatment for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: A Prospective Case Series and Review of Literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 21;21(4):1483. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041483. PubMed 32098249 ↗
  • Grotle M, Smastuen MC, Fjeld O, Grovle L, Helgeland J, Storheim K, Solberg TK, Zwart JA. Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e028743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028743. PubMed 31375617 ↗
  • Bajwa SJ, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):105-10. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.161589. PubMed 26288544 ↗
  • Tan M, Law LS, Gan TJ. Optimizing pain management to facilitate Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;62(2):203-18. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0275-x. Epub 2014 Dec 10. PubMed 25501696 ↗
  • Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29026331 ↗
  • Jain K, Jaiswal V, Puri A. Erector spinae plane block: Relatively new block on horizon with a wide spectrum of application - A case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):809-813. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_263_18. PubMed 30443066 ↗
  • Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, Broseta A, Andres J. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):209-220. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.19.00012. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PubMed 30886130 ↗
  • Canitez A, Kozanhan B, Aksoy N, Yildiz M, Tutar MS. Effect of erector spinae plane block on the postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 31. PubMed 34340839 ↗
  • Vaughan BN, Bartone CL, McCarthy CM, Answini GA, Hurford WE. Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Are Associated with Reduced Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay for Open Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5022. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215022. PubMed 34768541 ↗
  • Lin H, Guan J, Luo S, Chen S, Jiang J. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Quality of Recovery Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):861-871. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00395-9. Epub 2022 May 23. PubMed 35604613 ↗
  • Jin Y, Zhao S, Cai J, Blessing M, Zhao X, Tan H, Li J. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Control and Short-term Outcomes in Lumbar Laminoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 3;14:2717-2727. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S321514. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34512011 ↗
  • Zhang TJ, Zhang JJ, Qu ZY, Zhang HY, Qiu Y, Hua Z. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Open Posterior Lumbar Surgery. J Pain Res. 2020 Apr 5;13:709-717. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S248171. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32308470 ↗
  • Bhardwaj N. Enhanced recovery after surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;35(Suppl 1):S3-S4. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_57_19. No abstract available. PubMed 31142952 ↗
  • Kaye AD, Urman RD, Rappaport Y, Siddaiah H, Cornett EM, Belani K, Salinas OJ, Fox CJ. Multimodal analgesia as an essential part of enhanced recovery protocols in the ambulatory settings. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;35(Suppl 1):S40-S45. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_51_18. PubMed 31142958 ↗
  • Echeverria-Villalobos M, Stoicea N, Todeschini AB, Fiorda-Diaz J, Uribe AA, Weaver T, Bergese SD. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Perspective Review of Postoperative Pain Management Under ERAS Pathways and Its Role on Opioid Crisis in the United States. Clin J Pain. 2020 Mar;36(3):219-226. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000792. PubMed 31868759 ↗
  • Neuman MD, Bateman BT, Wunsch H. Inappropriate opioid prescription after surgery. Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1547-1557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30428-3. PubMed 30983590 ↗
  • Avis G, Gricourt Y, Vialatte PB, Meunier V, Perin M, Simon N, Claret PG, El Fertit H, Lefrant JY, Bertrand M, Cuvillon P. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jul 21:rapm-2022-103737. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103737. Online ahead of print. PubMed 35863786 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2024, 11 months after the start.

Of 40 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Diseases, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 43 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2023
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
StartActual
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06270654
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
May 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 21, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion