ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06267508LIFE2ScaleUpdated Nov 18, 2024

Increasing Neonatal HIV Test and Treat to Maximize the Long-Term Impact on Infant Health and Novel Infant Antiretroviral Treatment

An observational study in Vertical Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission, HIV Infection Pediatric and Infant Death, sponsored by Michael Hoelscher. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-18.

Sponsored by Michael Hoelscher · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to improve HIV healthcare services for mothers living with HIV and their newborns in Tanzania and Mozambique. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1) does enhancing screening with maternal HIV viral load monitoring at delivery identify more mother-child pairs at high-risk for HIV vertical transmission? and 2) are high-risk infants linked to appropriate prevention and care? The study will expand access to HIV testing services to more rural settings using a hub-and-spoke referral system.

Read the detailed description

The UN Sustainable Development Goals set the ambitious goal to eliminate new paediatric HIV infections by 2030. Between 2010 and 2020, new HIV infections among children declined by more than 50%. This decline demonstrates the goal is achievable, but the loss of momentum in recent years indicates a need for further improvements. Results from the previous LIFE study conducted in Mozambique and Tanzania demonstrated that identifying HIV-infection in neonates and starting HIV treatment as early as birth is feasible and may reduce infant death and severe disease. However, this study also demonstrated that it is difficult to administer infant HIV treatments due to poor palatability of the infant drug formulation, socio-behavioural constraints for mothers, and care linkage challenges. This resulted in poor treatment adherence and efficacy (as measured by HIV suppression rates in the blood).

The investigators propose to expand and optimize treatment and prevention interventions for mothers living with HIV and their newborns and translate previous research findings into policy and practice, with a focus on primary healthcare to reduce access inequities in rural areas. The study aims to scale-up of tools used for vertical HIV transmission risk screening affiliated with immediate, risk-based HIV test \& treat procedures. Testing for high-risk case detection will be implemented in a hub-and-spoke model, where smaller, less well-equipped health facilities refer samples to nearby larger health facilities for diagnostic testing, ensuring rural communities have access to the interventions. The investigators will also provide personnel support for scale-up of high-risk case detection and high-risk infant care management. Furthermore, all high-risk mother-baby pairs will receive enhanced counselling services. eHealth tools for electronic result sharing across health facilities will be part of our package of interventions.

The investigators will evaluate the impact of the intervention package described above on key prevention of vertical HIV transmission (PVHT) program indicators (e.g., percentage of high-risk newborns immediately tested for HIV, percentage of newborns with HIV immediately started on treatment) in a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized study. The investigators will also conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention package. Furthermore, the investigators will conduct interviews and use self-reported questionnaires by the participants and site staff to better understand the socio-economic and behavioural factors contributing to high-risk classification.

For HIV-positive babies, the investigators will assess the impact of a novel HIV drug used for newborns, i.e. Dolutegravir (DTG), on health outcomes. The investigators will also characterize the impact of transmitted and acquired genotypic drug resistance, as well as transmitted viral strains, towards neutralization against established and novel broadly neutralizing antibodies. This information will be used to inform future prevention and treatment strategies for HIV-exposed newborns.

All mothers of HIV-positive babies taking part in this study will continue to have access to enhanced counselling and care support throughout the study, and the investigators will collect information on socio-behavioural factors influencing treatment outcomes to understand challenges related to infant HIV treatment.

This study will be performed by an established consortium of interdisciplinary African and European experts, closely collaborating with health authorities and policy makers, thus ensuring effective and sustainable implementation, programmatic stewardship, and global access to the proposed complex intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vertical Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission
  • HIV Infection Pediatric
  • Infant Death
  • Infant Morbidity
  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases

Keywords

  • Prevention of Vertical HIV Transmission (PVHT)
  • Infant HIV Prophylaxis
  • Early Infant HIV Diagnosis
  • Infant Antiretroviral Treatment
03

In context

Infant Death

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Infant Death; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 6,000 is above the median of 368 across 11 observational studies indexed under Infant Death.

Browse Infant Death studies →

Lead sponsor

Michael Hoelscher is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women living with HIV and their exposed infants recruited at maternity clinics in Mozambique and Tanzania. The investigators expect to recruit 4000-6000 mother-child pairs in 12 months, or 56-71 mother-child pairs per cluster-randomization period (7 weeks) into Cohort A.

Assuming 12-week VHT rates of 2.5% and 1% VHT rates in Mozambique and Tanzania respectively, the investigators expect to roll-over approximately 105 HIV positive infants (75 in Mozambique and 30 in Tanzania) from both countries into Cohort B.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Voluntary and of the mother for her own study participation (if applicable);
  2. Voluntary and informed consent of the legal guardian of the child for participation of the child in the study;
  3. Mothers/legal guardians ≥18 years of age;
  4. Documented maternal infection;
  5. Willingness to consent to HIV testing for the child and herself (or just her child); and
  6. Willingness to consent to active tracing including home tracing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Deficiency in the mother, rendering it difficult, if not impossible, for her or her infant to take part in the study or understand the information provided to her.
  2. Having delivered more than 72h (3 days) ago;
  3. Prisoners;
  4. Women presenting with an emergency requiring immediate medical assistance if not resolved at study inclusion;
  5. Stillbirths;
  6. Infant requiring emergency care (e.g. immediate or rapid occurring life threatening conditions, resuscitation, prolonged obstetric related intensive care, severe jaundice) or born with severe malformation;
  7. If within the discretion of the investigator based on recommendation of the gynaecologist or paediatrician in charge study participation would possibly add not acceptable risk or burden to the mother or infant (e.g. significant congenital malformation, health deficiencies, very low birth weight less than 1500g); or
  8. Unlikely to comply with protocol as judged by the principal investigator or his designate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort A

    HIV-exposed infants and their mothers enrolled in the study

    Procedure: Maternal HIV viral load testing at delivery for VHT risk assessment

  • Cohort B

    HIV-positive infants, identified in the first 12 weeks, and their mothers will be rolled over from Cohort A to Cohort B for long-term follow-up for up to 12 months.

Interventions

  • ProcedureMaternal HIV viral load testing at delivery for VHT risk assessment

    Maternal HIV viral load testing will be performed for all mothers enrolled in the study at delivery. Results will be used along with WHO-defined clinical criteria to determine risk status for VHT. The intervention also includes personnel to support the additional testing volume and management of high-risk cases and eHealth solutions for communication of test results between health facilities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of HIV-exposed infants correctly identified as low- or high-risk and receiving birth EID testing and ePNP or ART as appropriate within 7 days of life

    All infants enrolled in the study: 1) assessed for high-risk criteria for VHT at birth, 2) if high-risk, receiving enhanced post-natal prophylaxis (ePNP) and PoC birth EID testing, AND 3) if HIV-positive, initiated on ART

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Turnaround times for EID testing at birth, 4-6 weeks, and 14 weeks (time from sample collection to receipt of results by the health facility and communication of results to the mother/caregiver) and maternal PoC VL testing at delivery and 14 weeks

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  2. Proportion and rate of VHT at birth, week 4-8, and week 14

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  3. Risk-factors associated with VHT

    Demographic, socio-economic, and behavioral data collected from mothers

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  4. Adherence to PNP and ePNP

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  5. Proportion and rate of clinical endpoints (mortality, morbidity) among HIV-positive infants at week 14, month 6, and month 12

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Age at ART initiation among HIV-positive infants

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Risk factors for poor ART adherence among high-risk mothers and infants

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Proportion of HIV-positive infants virally suppressed at week 14, month 6, and month 12

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Risk factors for poor viral suppression among HIV-positive infants

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Proportion of HIV-positive infants on ART that experience grade III or greater laboratory ART toxicity

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Retention to HIV EID and infant health care services

    Time frame: 14 weeks (Cohort A), 1 year (Cohort B)

  12. Proportion of pregnant women presenting with criteria considered high-risk for VHT at delivery

    Time frame: 7 days

  13. Proportion of mothers virally suppressed at week 14 post-partum

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  14. Proportion and rate of post-partum mothers newly fulfilling high-risk criteria based on socio-behavioural criteria (i.e., adherence issues)

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  15. Characteristics of transmitted viral strains (lineages, subtypes, resistance mutations) among HIV-positive infants and in comparison to their mothers viral sequences

    Mother-child comparative genomic analysis and virus quasi-species diversity (major/minor and transmitted strains)

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Proportion of HIV-positive infants who develop acquired drug resistance mutations during the study

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Characteristics of infant and maternal HIV strains to be neutralized against a panel of known broadly neutralizing antibody candidates (e.g., VRC07, 10-1074) and maternal autologous antibodies at time of transmission

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. Average public healthcare and healthcare-related expenditures

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Average health worker time needed to care for mothers and infants per clinic visit, including for enhanced counselling sessions

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Cost per HIV-exposed infant fulfilling the primary outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Empirical cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) relating intervention costs to life-years saved among HIV-positive infants

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Average global and dimensional patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 14 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Hub-and-spoke model and provider satisfaction (health care personnel, focal point persons, counsellor)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Socio-behavioural and personal aspects related to high-risk criteria for mother-child pairs (adherence, retention, disclosure, emotional well-being and health care satisfaction)

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  3. Descriptions of tasks, functions, acceptability, challenge and workloads related to PVHT and neonatal HIV focal persons

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Descriptions of tasks, functions, acceptability, challenge and workloads related to counsellors (enhanced high-risk counselling)

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Description on eHealth functionality, satisfaction, acceptance of linkage procedures

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Centro de Investigacao Operacional de Beira (CIOB), Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde,
    Beira, Mozambique
    Recruiting
    • Joaquim Lequechane · Contact
    • Ilesh Jani, MD, PhD · Contact
  • National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR)
    Mbeya, Tanzania
    Recruiting
    • Issa Sabi, MD, PhD · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 20 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 24, 2024
First posted
Feb 20, 2024
StartActual
Apr 30, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Nov 18, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06267508
Lead sponsor
Michael Hoelscher
Collaborators
National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) - Mbeya Medical Research Centre (MMRC), Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, University of Liverpool
Responsible party
Michael Hoelscher (Director, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich,, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2024
Start date
Apr 30, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2024

Study contacts

Arne Kroidl, MD
Contact
Arne.Kroidl@med.uni-muenchen.de
+49-89-4400 ext. 59816
Amy Heilman
Contact

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion