CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06266455THRIVEUpdated Jul 11, 2025

Individualized Nutrition to Optimize Preterm Infant Growth and Neurodevelopment

An interventional study of Standardized Fortification and Adjustable Fortification in Very Preterm Maturity of Infant and Very Low Birth Weight Infant, sponsored by Children's National Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 4 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-11.

Sponsored by Children's National Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 4 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Human milk has several well-established benefits but does not adequately meet the increased nutritional demands of the growing preterm infant, necessitating additional nutrient supplementation in a process known as fortification. In U.S. neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), human milk is primarily supplemented using standardized fortification, in which a multicomponent fortifier is added to human milk to achieve assumed nutrient content based on standard milk reference values. However, this method does not account for the significant variability in human milk composition or in preterm infant metabolism, and up to half of all very premature infants experience poor growth and malnutrition using current nutritional practices. Poor postnatal growth has adverse implications for the developing preterm brain and long-term neurodevelopment.

Recent advances allow for individualized methods of human milk fortification, including adjustable and targeted fortification. Adjustable fortification uses laboratory markers of protein metabolism (BUN level) to estimate an infant's protein requirements. In targeted fortification, a milk sample is analyzed to determine its specific macronutrient and energy content, with additional macronutrient supplementation provided as needed to achieve goal values. Emerging data suggest that both methods are safe and effective for improving growth, however information on their comparable efficacy and neurodevelopmental implications are lacking, particularly using advanced quantitative brain MRI (qMRI) techniques.

Through this prospective, randomized-controlled trial, the investigators will compare the impact of individualized human milk fortification on somatic growth and neurodevelopment in preterm infants. Infants will be randomized to receive one of three nutritional interventions: standardized (control group), adjustable, or targeted human milk fortification. Infants will undergo their assigned nutritional intervention until term-equivalent age or discharge home, whichever is achieved first. Brain qMRI will be performed at term-corrected age, and neurodevelopmental follow-up will be performed through 5 years of age.

02

Conditions studied

  • Very Preterm Maturity of Infant
  • Very Low Birth Weight Infant

Keywords

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Neurodevelopment
  • Nutrition
  • Fortification
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Children's National Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 124 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 4 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Birth gestational age (GA) of ≤32 weeks
  • Postnatal age ≤4 weeks at time of enrollment
  • Maternal plan to provide human milk to infant, and consent to providing donor human milk if insufficient maternal milk supply
  • Maternal age > 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Formula feeding prior to 36 weeks PMA or discharge home (whichever achieved first), either secondary to parental preference or medical necessity
  • Dysmorphic features or congenital anomalies suggestive of a genetic syndrome, metabolic disorder, chromosomal abnormality, or congenital infection
  • Dysgenetic or major destructive brain lesions detected by head ultrasound before enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standardized Fortification

    All study participants will undergo feed advancement and fortification with liquid, bovine-based human milk fortifier (HMF) to an assumed human milk content of 24kcal/oz per the Children's National Hospital NICU standardized clinical feeding protocol. The same milk fortification recipes are utilized for mother's own milk (MOM) and donor human milk (DHM). Each infant's growth trajectory is monitored (weight, length, and head circumference) with dietary modifications performed as needed based on growth parameters. Growth failure is defined as a decline in weight-for-age z-score by greater than 1 standard deviation (\>1 SD) beginning 1 week after reaching goal fortified feeds. For infants who demonstrate growth failure, Step 1 will be to add medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil. If growth remains sub-optimal, Step 2 will be to add liquid protein.

    Dietary Supplement: Standardized Fortification

  • Experimental
    Adjustable

    Adjustable fortification will begin 1 week after tolerating goal feeds of standardized fortification. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level as a marker of protein metabolism will be measured weekly, and supplementation with liquid protein will be adjusted as necessary to maintain a goal BUN level between 9-14mmol/dL, up to a maximum assumed protein intake of 4.5 g/kg/day. Liquid protein supplementation will be modified as follows: * BUN Level \<9 mmol/dL: Increase by 0.5g/kg/day * BUN Level 9-14 mmol/dL: No change * BUN Level \>14 mmol/dL: Decrease by 0.25g/kg/day * BUN Level \>20 mmol/dL: Hold for 1 week and re-assess Growth failure is defined as a decline in weight-for-age z-score by \>1 SD beginning 1 week after achieving BUN within goal range from adjustable fortification. For infants who demonstrate growth failure, MCT oil will be added and increased weekly as needed.

    Dietary Supplement: Standardized Fortification · Dietary Supplement: Adjustable Fortification

  • Experimental
    Targeted

    Targeted fortification will begin 1 week after tolerating goal feeds of standardized fortification. Additional supplementation with liquid protein and/or MCT oil will be provided based on twice weekly milk analysis using a mid-infrared human milk analyzer in order to meet macronutrient (carbohydrate, protein, lipid) and energy intake goals per pediatric nutrition guidelines (protein 4-4.5g/kg/day, fat 6-8g/kg/day, energy 120-130kcal/kg/day). Growth failure is defined as a decline in weight-for-age z-score by \>1 SD beginning 1 week after receiving macronutrient and energy intake within goal range from targeted fortification. For infants with growth failure, total energy intake will be increased with additional protein and/or MCT oil supplementation. Energy intake may be increased weekly as needed.

    Dietary Supplement: Standardized Fortification · Dietary Supplement: Adjustable Fortification

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementStandardized Fortification

    Fortification with liquid, bovine-based HMF to assumed human milk content of 24kcal/oz

  • Dietary supplementAdjustable Fortification

    Additional liquid protein supplementation to maintain serum BUN levels within goal range (9-14mmol/dL)

  • Dietary supplementAdjustable Fortification

    Additional liquid protein and/or MCT oil supplementation to maintain protein, fat, and energy intake within goal range based upon mid-infrared human milk analysis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weight Gain Velocity

    Weight gain velocity (grams per kilogram per day)

    Time frame: Study enrollment through nutritional intervention endpoint (term-equivalent age (40 weeks PMA [postmenstrual age]) or discharge home, whichever is achieved first)

  2. Length Growth Velocity

    Length growth velocity (centimeters per week)

    Time frame: Study enrollment through nutritional intervention endpoint (term-equivalent age (40 weeks PMA [postmenstrual age]) or discharge home, whichever is achieved first)

  3. Head Circumference Growth Velocity

    Head circumference growth velocity (centimeters per week)

    Time frame: Study enrollment through nutritional intervention endpoint (term-equivalent age (40 weeks PMA [postmenstrual age]) or discharge home, whichever is achieved first)

  4. Total and Regional Brain Volumes

    Total and regional (cortical and deep gray matter, white matter, amygdala-hippocampus, brainstem, cerebellum) brain volumes by MRI

    Time frame: Term-equivalent age (38 to 41 weeks postmenstrual age)

  5. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)

    Summary scores in 13 different domains (habituation, attention, handling, self-regulation, arousal, excitability, lethargy, hypertonicity, hypotonicity, non-optimal reflex, asymmetric reflex, quality of movement, stress)

    Time frame: Term-equivalent age (38 to 41 weeks postmenstrual age)

  6. Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)

    Composite score as well as 5 subscores: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, receptive language, and expressive language (reported as standardized t-scores, higher score indicates a better outcome, mean standardized t-score of 50 with standard deviation of 10)

    Time frame: 18 months corrected age

  7. Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)

    Composite score as well as 5 subscores: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, receptive language, and expressive language (reported as standardized t-scores, higher score indicates a better outcome, mean standardized t-score score of 50 with standard deviation of 10)

    Time frame: 36 months (3 years) of age

  8. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (4th edition) (WPPSI-IV)

    Five primary indices: verbal comprehension, visual spatial, working memory, fluid reasoning, and processing speed (higher score indicates better performance, score range 40 to 160)

    Time frame: 60 months (5 years) of age

  9. Differential Abilities Scale (2nd edition)-(DAS-II)

    \*For children with significant delays who may be unable to reach basal scores on the WPPSI-IV Early years core battery: verbal, nonverbal, and spatial reasoning subtests (higher score indicates better performance, score range 40-170)

    Time frame: 60 months (5 years) of age

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Children's National Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06266455
Lead sponsor
Children's National Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2024
Start date
Feb 8, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 11, 2025

Study contacts

Catherine Limperopoulos, Ph.D.
Contact
CLimpero@childrensnational.org
202-476-5293
Katherine M. Ottolini, M.D.
Contact
KOttolin@childrensnational.org
202-476-8905

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion