CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06254898Updated Jul 13, 2026

Use of Incentives for Stressful Medical Procedures

An interventional study of Child life standard of care and Child life standard of care + incentives provided with conditional agreement. in Healthy, sponsored by Jennifer Staab, MS, CCLS. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-13.

Sponsored by Jennifer Staab, MS, CCLS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2023, registered Dec 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
186
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the use of incentives in pediatric patients requiring medical procedures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Are incentives effective at reducing pediatric anxiety for medical procedures? What is the best way to use incentives with pediatric populations requiring medical procedures? Participants will be provided support in preparation for their procedure and during the procedure by a child life specialist and might receive an incentive prize after their procedure. Participants distress levels during the procedure will be observed and they will be asked to rate their anxiety on a visual analog scale.

Researchers will compare the anxiety of those who did or did not receive an incentive after their procedure to see if incentives reduced procedural anxiety.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact incentives have on the distress and cooperation of children undergoing stressful medical procedures. The primary aim is to determine if offering an incentive reduces procedural distress for children undergoing stressful medical procedures. Secondly, if an incentive is offered does the process for offering the incentive (conditional or unconditional) to the patient impact the procedural distress of the patient. Patient anxiety and visit satisfaction will be looked at as secondary measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • pediatrics
  • child life
  • medical procedures
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jennifer Staab, MS, CCLS as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients and parent of patients aged 6-100 years who are undergoing a medical procedure
  • Patients and parent of patients who are prepared and supported by a certified child life specialist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment that negates the use of the outcome tools
  • Children younger than 6 years old, or older than 17 years old.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
186 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Child life standard of care

    Child life standard of care

    Behavioral: Child life standard of care

  • Experimental
    Child life standard of care + incentives provided with conditional agreement.

    Child life standard of care + incentives provided with conditional agreement.

    Behavioral: Child life standard of care + incentives provided with conditional agreement.

  • Experimental
    Child life standard of care + incentive provided unconditionally.

    Child life standard of care + incentive provided unconditionally.

    Behavioral: Child life standard of care + incentive provided unconditionally.

Interventions

  • BehavioralChild life standard of care

    Standard preparation and support provided to the participant by a Certified Child Life Specialist.

  • BehavioralChild life standard of care + incentives provided with conditional agreement.

    Patient is provided standard preparation and support provided to the participant by a Certified Child Life Specialist. Before the procedure the child life specialist discusses earning a prize with the patient if they demonstrate the agreed upon coping goal (i.e. holding arm still, taking deep breaths, engaging in distraction.) At the end of the procedure the patient is provided with the prize if they earn the prize based on the agreed upon coping plan.

  • BehavioralChild life standard of care + incentive provided unconditionally.

    Patient is provided standard preparation and support provided to the participant by a Certified Child Life Specialist. After the procedure is complete the patient is provided with a prize. The patient does not need to do anything to earn the prize.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS)

    Observational measure of anxiety in pediatric patients. Scores range from 23.33 to 100, lower scores meaning less anxiety.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery

  2. Visual Scale Self-Report Anxiety

    Visual analog scale used for participants to report their perceived anxiety. Scores range from 0-100, lower scores meaning the participant is less anxious.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visit Satisfaction Survey

    Visit satisfaction survey completed by the accompanying parent.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Children's Hospital Colorado Anschutz
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado North Campus
    Broomfield, Colorado 80023, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado South Campus
    Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06254898
Lead sponsor
Jennifer Staab, MS, CCLS
Responsible party
Jennifer Staab, MS, CCLS (Principal Investigator, Children's Hospital Colorado) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2024
Start date
Jun 2, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 8, 2026
Completion
Jun 8, 2026
Last update
Jul 13, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion