An interventional study of Dermal subsitute Glyaderm + skin graft and Skin graft alone in Burns, Full Thickness Burn and Necrotizing Fascitis, sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-08.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The study will explore the potential of utilizing Glyaderm® in a single-stage engrafting process, aiming for a more cost-effective approach. While the absence of the reticular dermal layer is a challenge associated with autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), often leading to hypertrophic scars and contractures, various dermal substitutes with inconsistent results exist. Bilayered skin reconstruction using glycerolized acellular dermis (Glyaderm®) has shown promise in improving scar quality through a two-step procedure. However, unlike the typical two-step process required for most dermal substitutes, our investigation focuses on the cost-effective application of Glyaderm® in a single-stage engrafting. This approach, if successful, could offer advantages such as reduced costs, shorter hospitalization times, and lower infection rates-attributes preferred by many surgeons, especially when autografts are available.
BACKGROUND. Patients suffering from severe burn injury are often confronted with life-threatening complications such as absence of the protective skin barrier which eventually lead to infections, sepsis and even death. The standard therapy for deep and full thickness burns consists of surgical debridement and coverage with autologous split thickness skin grafts (STSG) which normally results in a fast closure of the wounds contributing to an increased survival rate for burn victims. However, these thin skin grafts almost exclusively consist of epidermis only and due to the absence of most of the thicker dermal layer, which is crucial for the mechanical properties of the skin, the healing of these burn wounds inevitably results in hypertrophic and unaesthetic scar formation and contractures. Subsequently a long and difficult rehabilitation follows often with in the end poor aesthetic and functional long-term results and frequent psychological problems. Ideally, both skin layers (epidermis+dermis) should be reconstructed to improve the scar quality and therefore the quality of life after burns. As a consequence, dermal substitutes are necessary but the extremely high cost of all currently available dermal substitutes still is a major obstacle for its widespread application.
SCIENTIFIC APPROACH. At the burn center of the Ghent University Hospital a significant amount lot of research has been targeted towards the development of a dermal substitute based on glycerolized allogenic skin grafts (Glyaderm). The use of human skin for dermal substitutes is ideal because the natural 3D network of collagen and elastin fibers is already provided and can be preserved. In order to prevent rejection our research group, together with the Euro Tissue Bank (ETB), developed a method of decellularization with a low concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Previous publications from our research team have demonstrated the beneficial effects of Glyaderm compared to STSG-only application. Unfortunately, our initial protocol required an additional surgical procedure to allow for optimal ingrowth of the dermal substitute before the STSG could be applied. This increased not only the time to healing but also the costs involved. Within the last two years a pilot study has demonstrated that further optimization of the substitute and of the procedure resulted in a successful simultaneous application of Glyaderm and STSG. The scientific objective of this project is to obtain the necessary clinical evidence for this improved applicability of Glyaderm in deep burns or full thickness skin defects by providing a bilayered reconstruction of the skin with simultaneous application of this dermal substitute combined with a STSG in a one surgical procedure. The scientific approach will consist of performing a large prospective, controlled, randomized, intra-individual comparative clinical study, investigating simultaneous application of Glyaderm + STSG versus STSG alone in deep burns and other full thickness skin defects. Power calculation determined that a total of 75 patients must be included: both early outcome parameters (graft take, ingrowth, and time to healing) as well as late outcome measurements (scar characteristics, quality of life, histology) will be evaluated up to 12 months post burn.
UTILIZATION. A recent report of the Kennis Centrum/Centre d'Expertise (KCE) demonstrated that each year more than 2500 (severely) burned patients are admitted to a Belgian hospital or burn center with the majority of them requiring surgical therapy (ref). The utilization objective of this project is to make Glyaderm universally available for the treatment of patients with deep burns or other full thickness skin defects. This effective, low-cost and easy-to-use dermal substitute should facilitate the patient's rehabilitation by providing a more aesthetic scar formation with less functional impairment. The ultimate goal is an improved quality of life for the patient with a better reintegration of the burn victims into society. Our utilization strategy will focus on the actual application of the study results for the patient's well-being and an important role hereby is reserved for the Advisory Committee. For this purpose we have extended an already existing network of major stakeholders who all are committed to the clinical utilization process. Included in this group are representatives of: patients' self-help groups, the Belgian Burn Foundation, an inter-mutualistic committee, a representative from the RIZIV (national health care reimbursement organization), of health economics and from Belgian and Dutch tissue banks. If indeed the results of our clinical study demonstrate an improved aesthetic and functional outcome as well as a significant reduction in time to heal and operative costs, then this should eventually lead to a better reimbursement, even in the current era of budget restrictions. Implementation of Glyaderm as a readily-available and easy to use reconstructive tool into the existing armamentarium of the surgeon will be realized through workshops, training courses as well as presentation in national and international congresses.
The ultimate goal is to establish a universal application of this cost-effective dermal substitute in Flanders and due to the simplicity of the decellularization procedure also throughout Belgium and even worldwide. Glyaderm could be used on all aesthetically or functionally important places and even more so in children and in economically disadvantaged patients.
905 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 164 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 82 is above the median of 40 across 663 interventional studies indexed under Burns.
Browse Burns studies →University Hospital, Ghent is the lead sponsor of 689 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Intra-individual approach Patient has 2 comparable (near) full thickness skin defects or 1 (near) full thickness skin defect that can be divided into 2 comparable regions. Randomization: the defect randomized in this arm receives only a skin graft.
Procedure: Skin graft alone
Intra-individual approach Patient has 2 comparable (near) full thickness skin defects or 1 (near) full thickness skin defect that can be divided into 2 comparable regions. Randomization: the defect randomized in this arm receives a skin graft combined with Glyaderm
Procedure: Dermal subsitute Glyaderm + skin graft
A human donor-derived dermal substitute will be implanted together with a skin graft
Skin graft alone with no dermal substitute
Graft take
take of the skin graft 6 days post-surgery, expressed as a percentage
Time frame: 7 days
healing time
the time needed until the wound is at least 95% closed AND does not need a significant wound dressing. Expressed in days.
Time frame: up to 1 month
bacterial load
The bacterial load is the amount of bacteria that is present in the wound, assessed with a wound swab. The bacterial load is expressed on a semi-quantative scale -,+,++,+++
Time frame: up to 1 month
scar hydration
the hydration state of the stratum corneum of the scar. Expressed in arbitrary units.
Time frame: 1 year
scar water evaporation
the evaporation of water at the level of the stratum corneum of the scar as measured by the Tewameter. Expressed in g/h/m²
Time frame: 1 year
scar elasticity
the elasticity of the scar as measured by the cutometer. Expressed in arbitrary units.
Time frame: 1 year
extracellular matrix formation
the organization of the extracellular matrix as assessed by light microscopy on a biopsy. Expressed on a numerical scale of 0-5 from not present to well organized.
Time frame: 1 year
scar color, erythema
The redness of the scar as measured by the mexameter. Expressed in arbitrary units.
Time frame: 1 year
scar color, pigmentation
amount of pigmentation present in the scar as measured by the mexameter. Expressed in arbitrary units.
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: Undecided — Share all data in scientific publication
Ran from Feb 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2021, 55 months.
Of 210 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Burns, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38. This study's 55 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 239 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.