ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06249971Updated Feb 8, 2024

A Single-stage Bilayered Skin Reconstruction With Glyaderm®

An interventional study of Dermal subsitute Glyaderm + skin graft and Skin graft alone in Burns, Full Thickness Burn and Necrotizing Fascitis, sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-08.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2017, registered Jan 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will explore the potential of utilizing Glyaderm® in a single-stage engrafting process, aiming for a more cost-effective approach. While the absence of the reticular dermal layer is a challenge associated with autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), often leading to hypertrophic scars and contractures, various dermal substitutes with inconsistent results exist. Bilayered skin reconstruction using glycerolized acellular dermis (Glyaderm®) has shown promise in improving scar quality through a two-step procedure. However, unlike the typical two-step process required for most dermal substitutes, our investigation focuses on the cost-effective application of Glyaderm® in a single-stage engrafting. This approach, if successful, could offer advantages such as reduced costs, shorter hospitalization times, and lower infection rates-attributes preferred by many surgeons, especially when autografts are available.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND. Patients suffering from severe burn injury are often confronted with life-threatening complications such as absence of the protective skin barrier which eventually lead to infections, sepsis and even death. The standard therapy for deep and full thickness burns consists of surgical debridement and coverage with autologous split thickness skin grafts (STSG) which normally results in a fast closure of the wounds contributing to an increased survival rate for burn victims. However, these thin skin grafts almost exclusively consist of epidermis only and due to the absence of most of the thicker dermal layer, which is crucial for the mechanical properties of the skin, the healing of these burn wounds inevitably results in hypertrophic and unaesthetic scar formation and contractures. Subsequently a long and difficult rehabilitation follows often with in the end poor aesthetic and functional long-term results and frequent psychological problems. Ideally, both skin layers (epidermis+dermis) should be reconstructed to improve the scar quality and therefore the quality of life after burns. As a consequence, dermal substitutes are necessary but the extremely high cost of all currently available dermal substitutes still is a major obstacle for its widespread application.

SCIENTIFIC APPROACH. At the burn center of the Ghent University Hospital a significant amount lot of research has been targeted towards the development of a dermal substitute based on glycerolized allogenic skin grafts (Glyaderm). The use of human skin for dermal substitutes is ideal because the natural 3D network of collagen and elastin fibers is already provided and can be preserved. In order to prevent rejection our research group, together with the Euro Tissue Bank (ETB), developed a method of decellularization with a low concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Previous publications from our research team have demonstrated the beneficial effects of Glyaderm compared to STSG-only application. Unfortunately, our initial protocol required an additional surgical procedure to allow for optimal ingrowth of the dermal substitute before the STSG could be applied. This increased not only the time to healing but also the costs involved. Within the last two years a pilot study has demonstrated that further optimization of the substitute and of the procedure resulted in a successful simultaneous application of Glyaderm and STSG. The scientific objective of this project is to obtain the necessary clinical evidence for this improved applicability of Glyaderm in deep burns or full thickness skin defects by providing a bilayered reconstruction of the skin with simultaneous application of this dermal substitute combined with a STSG in a one surgical procedure. The scientific approach will consist of performing a large prospective, controlled, randomized, intra-individual comparative clinical study, investigating simultaneous application of Glyaderm + STSG versus STSG alone in deep burns and other full thickness skin defects. Power calculation determined that a total of 75 patients must be included: both early outcome parameters (graft take, ingrowth, and time to healing) as well as late outcome measurements (scar characteristics, quality of life, histology) will be evaluated up to 12 months post burn.

UTILIZATION. A recent report of the Kennis Centrum/Centre d'Expertise (KCE) demonstrated that each year more than 2500 (severely) burned patients are admitted to a Belgian hospital or burn center with the majority of them requiring surgical therapy (ref). The utilization objective of this project is to make Glyaderm universally available for the treatment of patients with deep burns or other full thickness skin defects. This effective, low-cost and easy-to-use dermal substitute should facilitate the patient's rehabilitation by providing a more aesthetic scar formation with less functional impairment. The ultimate goal is an improved quality of life for the patient with a better reintegration of the burn victims into society. Our utilization strategy will focus on the actual application of the study results for the patient's well-being and an important role hereby is reserved for the Advisory Committee. For this purpose we have extended an already existing network of major stakeholders who all are committed to the clinical utilization process. Included in this group are representatives of: patients' self-help groups, the Belgian Burn Foundation, an inter-mutualistic committee, a representative from the RIZIV (national health care reimbursement organization), of health economics and from Belgian and Dutch tissue banks. If indeed the results of our clinical study demonstrate an improved aesthetic and functional outcome as well as a significant reduction in time to heal and operative costs, then this should eventually lead to a better reimbursement, even in the current era of budget restrictions. Implementation of Glyaderm as a readily-available and easy to use reconstructive tool into the existing armamentarium of the surgeon will be realized through workshops, training courses as well as presentation in national and international congresses.

The ultimate goal is to establish a universal application of this cost-effective dermal substitute in Flanders and due to the simplicity of the decellularization procedure also throughout Belgium and even worldwide. Glyaderm could be used on all aesthetically or functionally important places and even more so in children and in economically disadvantaged patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Burns
  • Full Thickness Burn
  • Necrotizing Fascitis
03

In context

Burns

905 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 82 is above the median of 40 across 663 interventional studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent is the lead sponsor of 689 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All deep partial thickness and full-thickness burns as shown by laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and/or clinically evaluated by two plastic surgeons or a burn care coordinator
  • Other full-thickness skin defects besides burns, e.g. necrotizing fasciitis, deglovements or phalloplasty donor sites after free flap harvest
  • Possibility to follow the complete treatment schedule until final graft take and subsequently wound healing and participation in the follow-up schedule
  • has been obtained • Age between 18-80 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All partial-thickness burns that can heal by conservative treatment confirmed by LDI • Not completing the treatment schedule or declining further follow-up • The patient has any condition(s) that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete this study. • The patient has participated in another study utilizing an drug within the previous 30 days • The patient has one or more medical condition(s) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient an inappropriate candidate for this study e.g. diabetes, renal or hepatic insufficiency, immune or neurologic disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Split thickness skin graft alone

    Intra-individual approach Patient has 2 comparable (near) full thickness skin defects or 1 (near) full thickness skin defect that can be divided into 2 comparable regions. Randomization: the defect randomized in this arm receives only a skin graft.

    Procedure: Skin graft alone

  • Experimental
    Split thickness skin graft + Glyaderm

    Intra-individual approach Patient has 2 comparable (near) full thickness skin defects or 1 (near) full thickness skin defect that can be divided into 2 comparable regions. Randomization: the defect randomized in this arm receives a skin graft combined with Glyaderm

    Procedure: Dermal subsitute Glyaderm + skin graft

Interventions

  • ProcedureDermal subsitute Glyaderm + skin graft

    A human donor-derived dermal substitute will be implanted together with a skin graft

  • ProcedureSkin graft alone

    Skin graft alone with no dermal substitute

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Graft take

    take of the skin graft 6 days post-surgery, expressed as a percentage

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. healing time

    the time needed until the wound is at least 95% closed AND does not need a significant wound dressing. Expressed in days.

    Time frame: up to 1 month

  3. bacterial load

    The bacterial load is the amount of bacteria that is present in the wound, assessed with a wound swab. The bacterial load is expressed on a semi-quantative scale -,+,++,+++

    Time frame: up to 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. scar hydration

    the hydration state of the stratum corneum of the scar. Expressed in arbitrary units.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. scar water evaporation

    the evaporation of water at the level of the stratum corneum of the scar as measured by the Tewameter. Expressed in g/h/m²

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. scar elasticity

    the elasticity of the scar as measured by the cutometer. Expressed in arbitrary units.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. extracellular matrix formation

    the organization of the extracellular matrix as assessed by light microscopy on a biopsy. Expressed on a numerical scale of 0-5 from not present to well organized.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. scar color, erythema

    The redness of the scar as measured by the mexameter. Expressed in arbitrary units.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. scar color, pigmentation

    amount of pigmentation present in the scar as measured by the mexameter. Expressed in arbitrary units.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ghent University Hospital
    Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen 9000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Decker I, Hoeksema H, Verbelen J, De Coninck P, Speeckaert M, De Schepper S, Blondeel P, Pirayesh A, Monstrey S, Claes KEY. A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm(R) as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial. Burns Trauma. 2023 May 2;11:tkad015. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad015. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37143955 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Share all data in scientific publication

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2021, 55 months.

Of 210 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Burns, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38. This study's 55 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 239 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 18, 2024
First posted
Feb 8, 2024
StartActual
Feb 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2021
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2021
Last update
Feb 8, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06249971
Collaborators
Research Foundation Flanders
Responsible party
Phillip Blondeel (Professor Dr Stan Monstrey, University Hospital, Ghent) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 8, 2024
Start date
Feb 1, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2021
Completion
Sep 30, 2021
Last update
Feb 8, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion