An observational study in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational
The management of lung cancer is a major public health challenge. Molecular anomaly testing is recommended from the early stages for optimal and personalized care of all lung adenocarcinomas and non-smoker lung cancers. The search for these anomalies relies on increasingly advanced and sensitive analysis techniques, particularly Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), which can simultaneously detect various molecular abnormalities in both DNA and RNA, including point mutations, complex mutations, rearrangements, and amplifications. These techniques are predominantly performed on biopsy specimens embedded in paraffin. However, these biopsies may require invasive and sometimes iatrogenic procedures, and their feasibility, quantity, and quality of the samples can be limited. The turnaround time for analysis results from the time of biopsy is typically around 2 to 3 weeks.
In recent years, alongside the improvement in the sensitivity of molecular analysis techniques, liquid biopsy has emerged as a valuable approach, particularly in the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). ctDNA is a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker that has been validated for detecting targetable molecular anomalies similar to those detected by "conventional" biopsies. ctDNA can be detected in plasma through a simple blood draw, as well as in cerebrospinal fluid, urine, saliva, or any other "liquid" sample from the patient. The concordance between mutations identified in the tumor and those detected in the blood exceeds 90% specificity in numerous studies. However, the sensitivity of ctDNA detection varies depending on the stage of the disease and the sensitivity of the detection technique used.
The utility of bronchial ctDNA is currently underexplored. However, there is a rationale for investigating ctDNA as close as possible to the cancerous lesion at the bronchial level. Bronchial ctDNA could play a role in molecular diagnosis for distal lesions not visible through endoscopy and could also help reduce costs and turnaround time for molecular diagnosis in larger tumors.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the utility of liquid biopsy (ctDNA and ctRNA) during bronchoscopy in the molecular diagnosis and management of bronchial carcinomas. This is a prospective multicenter French study.
6,491 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,633 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 79 is below the median of 161 across 949 observational studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.
Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,506 studies on the registry; 1,007 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy for Diagnostic Evaluation or Follow-up of Lung Cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
Sensibility of bronchial ctDNA
Calculation of the sensitivity of bronchial ctDNA for the molecular diagnosis of lung cancers
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 month
Diagnostic Performance of ctDNA Molecular Testing
Specificity; Positive Predictive Value; Negatice Predictive Value
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 month
Diagnostic Performance of ctDNA Molecular Testing
Sensibility; Specificity; Positive Predictive Value; Negatice Predictive Value
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 month
Comparing Turnaround Time of Molecular Biology Results
Time of Molecular Biology Results for Bronchial ctDNA and ctRNA (versus Standard Histology)
Time frame: Through study completion
Comparison of Performance between Bronchial ctDNA and Blood ctDNA when Available
Calculation of the concordance rate between these 2 methods.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 month
Evaluating Analysis Modalities in Liquid Biopsy Techniques
Description of the methods of the analysis technique using the supernatant vs pellet
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 month
Subgroup Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Bronchial ctDNA and ctRNA
Description of the mutations found in the lung cancers
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 month
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung→
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris