ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06225739Updated Aug 5, 2025

Evaluation of Electronic Pregnancy Registers and Mobile Applications for Monitoring Pregnancy Outcomes ( EVAPREAP )

An observational study in Pregnancy Related, sponsored by European Vaccine Initiative. Completed at 4 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-05.

Sponsored by European Vaccine Initiative · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
15 Years to 49 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Monitoring pregnancy outcomes during pregnancy is very important in assessing the effectiveness of interventions. This study aims to create pregnancy registers and evaluate pregnancy mobile applications as a potential tool for monitoring pregnancy outcomes in future placental malaria (PM) vaccine trials, as well as for the implementation of any other intervention in this target group.

Read the detailed description

Background: Malaria during pregnancy remains a major public health problem. A consortium from Africa and Europe is further advancing the clinical development of two PM vaccine candidates (PAMVAC-cVLP and PRIMVAC). These vaccines have previously been shown to be safe, well-tolerated and able to induce a strong and functional immune response. Monitoring pregnancy outcomes during pregnancy is very important in assessing the effectiveness of interventions against PM. The increased availability of mobile phones makes them a potential tool for improving quality of care for pregnant women, accurately collecting and reporting pregnancy outcomes in identified cohorts of pregnant women. Data on the feasibility and acceptability of the mobile applications for tracking pregnancy outcomes in the areas targeted for clinical testing of candidate PM vaccines is however limited. This study will explore the creation of electronic pregnancy registers and evaluate pregnancy mobile applications as a potential tool for monitoring pregnancy outcomes in future PM vaccine trials, as well as for the implementation of other future interventions in Ghana, Burkina Faso, Benin and Malawi.

Overall aim: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of open-source mobile applications in tracking pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women in sub- Saharan Africa.

Methods: The study will be carried out in two phases. The first phase will involve the mapping of health application tools, and the selection of one of the tools for the registration of pregnancies at each of the participating sites. The evaluation process will involve a two-level test namely alpha and beta. Prior to the selection of the electronic tool, the team will define the data characteristics and requirements of the pregnancy register. This will be followed by a description of the process flow and the expected functionality of the pregnancy register including visualization and reporting of outcomes of interest. After this, specifications of the interface technologies, the database technologies, and the network requirements will be determined. Each site will create a pregnancy register using REDCap. The second phase will involve the assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of mobile application. At the evaluation phase, qualitative methods will be used to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using the selected mobile application for tracking pregnancy outcomes. The selected app will be tested by pregnant women. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) will be used to explore the perceptions of pregnant women and health workers on the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of open-source mobile applications for tracking pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women. Pregnant women from rural and urban parts of the study areas who will be able to use the electronic application and are willing to participate in the interviews will be purposively selected from the pregnancy register, and health workers sampled from the health facilities.

Expected outcome: The assessment of mobile applications for monitoring pregnancy outcomes and development of pregnancy registers will build the base for future PM vaccine trials and any other interventions tackling PM. If acceptability and feasibility is demonstrated, mobile applications could be linked to other tools that will provide support to front line health care workers and patients to ensure uptake and continued access to essential maternal and neonatal care services through responsive customized needs of patients in view of routine care packages.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Related

Keywords

  • Pregnancy register
  • Mobile application
  • Pregnancy outcome
03

In context

Lead sponsor

European Vaccine Initiative is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Phase 1 study population will include pregnant women of all ages attending antenatal care (ANC) facility. Phase 2 study population will include pregnant women aged 15-49 years attending ANC facility and health workers who provide healthcare services to pregnant women at ANC clinics or Maternity ward

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women attending ANC facility in the study area
  • Pregnant women whose ANC information can be accessed at the ANC facility
  • Health workers providing care to pregnant women at ANC or Maternity facilities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women attending ANC outside the study area
  • Pregnant women whose ANC information cannot be accessed at the ANC facility
  • Pregnant women unwilling or unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
9 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Pregnant women

    Other: Electronic pregnancy register · Other: In-depth interviews and focus group discussions

  • Health care providers

    In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) will be used to assess the user experience and the perceptions of pregnant women and health workers on the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of open-source mobile applications for tracking pregnancy outcomes

    Other: In-depth interviews and focus group discussions

Interventions

  • OtherElectronic pregnancy register

    Electronic pregnancy register will be created based on local ANC register to monitor pregnancy outcomes across all sites. Pregnant women of all ages attending antenatal care (ANC) facility will be registered

  • OtherIn-depth interviews and focus group discussions

    In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) will be used to assess the user experience and the perceptions of pregnant women and health workers on the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of open-source mobile applications for tracking pregnancy outcomes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of mobile application for registration of pregnant women and tracking pregnancy outcomes

    Assess whether an open-source mobile applications is easy and convenient to use accounting for advantages and disadvantages to guide integrating the App into routine workflow via qualitative methods: In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs)

    Time frame: 9 months

  2. Usability of mobile application for registration of pregnant women and tracking pregnancy outcomes

    Assess whether open-source mobile applications could be used by pregnant women and health workers to adequately record, track, and summarize data, including whether it functioned in a way that enhanced productivity or led to unproductive tasks due to errors. The assessment will be done using qualitative methods: In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs)

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. Acceptability of mobile application for registration of pregnant women and tracking pregnancy outcomes

    Acceptability will be defined as pregnant women and health workers and other stakeholders found the Client Data App acceptability, including its interface and navigation features. The assessment will be done using qualitative methods: In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs)

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Scientifique (FORS)
    Cotonou, Benin
  • Groupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS)
    Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
  • Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC)
    Kintampo, Ghana
  • Malawi University of Science and Technology (MUST)
    Mikolongwe, Malawi
08

References and documents

Related links

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 18 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2024
First posted
Jan 26, 2024
StartActual
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 5, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06225739
Lead sponsor
European Vaccine Initiative
Collaborators
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana, Fondation pour la Recherche Scientifique, Benin, Groupe de Recherche Action en Sante, Malawi University of Science and Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025
Completion
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 5, 2025

Study contacts

Kwaku Poku Asante, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion