ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06218082VIRTUAL-UKUpdated Sep 15, 2026

Vitiligo Registry for Adults and Children in the UK

An observational study in Dermatologic Disease and Vitiligo, sponsored by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Primary conditionVitiligoRegistry: Skin DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Skin Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Vitiligo
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Vitiligo, a narrower term within Skin Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Vitiligo is the most common depigmentation disorder affecting around 1% of the population worldwide. Fifty two percent of patients develop vitiligo before the age of 20 and around 80% develop vitiligo before the age of 30 years old.1 Vitiligo often presents in childhood and tends to be a lifelong disease, requiring prolonged courses of phototherapy.

Currently no national or international registry for patients with vitiligo exists. Individual dermatologists maintain a database of such patients, however no coordinated efforts have been made to combine these individual registries into a broader national registry. Finally, recently published British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) guideline for the management of vitiligo, recommended the development of a national registry for people with vitiligo undergoing systemic or light therapy to identify outcomes and safety.

Read the detailed description

Vitiligo is the most common depigmentation disorder affecting around 1% of the population worldwide. Fifty two percent of patients develop vitiligo before the age of 20 and around 80% develop vitiligo before the age of 30 years old. Vitiligo often presents in childhood and tends to be a lifelong disease, requiring prolonged courses of phototherapy.

Vitiligo is an autoimmune skin disorder and is often associated with multiple other autoimmune disorders such as thyroid disorders, diabetes, IBS, pernicious anemia, alopecia areata amongst others. Current treatments include topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, combination of phototherapy with oral corticosteroids, laser and surgical interventions. Other treatment modalities such as Methotrexate have also been trialed. Currently available treatments are being used off license with uncertain therapeutic success.

Previously, it has been shown that vitiligo has an inverse relationship with melanoma, which means that people with vitiligo are less likely to develop melanoma. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis looking into the risk of skin cancer in people with vitiligo showed that compared with people without vitiligo, people with vitiligo had a significantly lower risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer. The same pattern occurred for melanoma (but was not statistically significant). However, this review was limited by the small number of included studies and high heterogeneity due to methodological and clinical differences between the included studies. In addition, there is lack of data on the skin cancer risk for vitiligo patients who receive prolonged phototherapy courses, especially regarding high cumulative exposures in children with less deeply pigmented skin. This is especially important when NB-UVB is combined with topical tacrolimus treatment, due to theoretical increased risk of skin cancer.

In addition, there is an urgent need for new, effective and licensed treatment for vitiligo. In the dawn on new therapeutic era of new emerging treatments such as topical and oral JAK inhibitors, evidence will be needed on the effectiveness, safety and cost effectiveness of such therapies compared to other treatments. In order to gather evidence on clinical effectiveness of vitiligo treatments and to assist with updating of clinical guidance pathway, as well as to gather information on possible risk factors, adverse events, maintenance regime and assist with conduction of post marketing studies, prospective multicentre registry is needed for vitiligo patients who are treated with phototherapy, combination treatments (with phototherapy), oral agents (such as oral corticosteroids) including new emerging JAK inhibitors (once there are available in the UK).

Oral corticosteroids combined with phototherapy are recommended by the recently published BAD guidelines for cases of rapidly progressive vitiligo. Case reports were published on initiation of methotrexate and oral JAK inhibitors for the treatment of vitiligo.

In addition, there is no firm data on disease progression and especially predictors of rapidly progressive vitiligo are largely unknown, which is a challenging scenario for the patient and their clinician.

Currently no national or international registry for patients with vitiligo exists. Individual dermatologists maintain a database of such patients, however no coordinated efforts have been made to combine these individual registries into a broader national registry. Finally, recently published British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) guideline for the management of vitiligo, recommended the development of a national registry for people with vitiligo undergoing systemic or light therapy to identify outcomes and safety.2

As an initial, preliminary step for the development of the online UK registry for vitiligo patients, development of a pilot multi-centred registry in the UK is needed. In addition, such registry will be co-ordinated with a pilot multi-centred registry in France and the USA. Each registry will be developed separately (country-specific) and there will be no data sharing between the registries, however there will be co-ordination between the CIs of the registries with regards to the outcomes collected.

Another challenge in vitiligo has been consistency in the use of core outcome domains and measures instruments to define treatment success or failure. The international Initiative for Outcomes for vitiligo (INFO) has previously addressed this heterogeneity and defined 3 outcome domains as being essential: repigmentation, side effects/harms and maintenance of gained repigmentation. Four items were further recommended for inclusion but were not considered to be essential: cosmetic acceptability of the results, quality of life, cessation of spreading of vitiligo and tolerability or burden of treatment.5 INFO has subsequently published recommendations on how to measure repigmentation in target lesion. Percentage of repigmentation in quartiles (0-25%, 26-50%, 51-79%, 80-100%) should be measured as well as cosmetic acceptability of results should be assessed using the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale.6 There are also several other established instruments exist (such as VASI, VIPs, VITs) to measure these domains and these are suitable for use in a registry.

A long-term safety data will be vital to provide pharmacovigilance, particularly regarding rare or delayed adverse effects of treatment. Hence a prospective multicentre registry study is greatly needed to evaluate the real-world use of phototherapy (including combination treatments with phototherapy), topical JAK inhibitors, systemic immuno-modulatory therapies in adults and children undergoing treatment for vitiligo to provide effectiveness and safety data beyond the confines of short-term randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Such a registry will ultimately inform treatment guidelines, provide pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic research data, and help to identify those patients likely to experience rapid disease progression, ultimately improving and personalising patient care. With novel topical and oral immunomodulatory therapies having just entering vitiligo clinical practice, the timing is ideal to harness the high-quality data collection offered by the UK NHS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatologic Disease
  • Vitiligo

Browse trials for

03

In context

Vitiligo Reclassified

343 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitiligo; 96 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 114 across 67 observational studies indexed under Vitiligo.

Browse Vitiligo studies →

Lead sponsor

The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Compared within Vitiligo, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Skin Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All consecutive patients (adults and children) seen at various hospitals in the UK and who are diagnosed with vitiligo will be included. Vitiligo patients who receive therapy with systemic steroids, phototherapy including laser, surgical treatments, new immunomodulators (e.g. topical or oral JAK inhibitor) once they enter UK market and any combination therapies of the above will be eligible to be included in the registry.

There is no upper or lower age limit for participation. The decision to therapy or switch to another systemic agent will be the result of the treating dermatology consultant's decision, following discussion with the patient/parent/legal guardian, without using a pre-specified severity score cut off. It is the treating physician's responsibility to ensure that patients are suitable for the therapy, and that any standard of care treatment or assessments are provided alongside participation in the study as per local requirements.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Paediatric and adult patients with vitiligo under management in secondary care.
  2. Written for study participation obtained from the patient or parents / legal guardian, with assent as appropriate by the patient, depending on the level of understanding.
  3. Participants consent to participate in long-term follow up and access to all relevant medical records as needed by the study team
  4. Clinical diagnosis of vitiligo made by a dermatologist
  5. Willingness to comply with all study requirements.
  6. Competent use of English language, according to patient's age (capable of understanding patient questionnaires).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Insufficient understanding of the study by the patient and/or parent/guardian.
  2. Patients with vitiligo/their parents or guardians, who do not provide consent for participation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Multi-centred registry will be developed, with an aim to establish short- and long-term safety (pharmacovigilance) and effectiveness of vitiligo therapies

    VIRTUAL-UK is a small registry and in collaboration with the BAD, aims to utilize and modify one of the existing platforms (software), in order to assist the end user (i.e. Dermatologists) in accessing the platform and reducing the time needed for training and data input.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. To document the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities including cancers, previous treatments of patients included in the cohort as assessed by the case report forms (CRFs).

    To document the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities including cancers, previous treatments of patients included in the cohort as assessed by the case report forms (CRFs).

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. To describe the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities including cancers, previous treatments of patients included in the cohort

    To describe the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities including cancers, previous treatments of patients included in the cohort

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. To assess short- and long-term safety (pharmacovigilance) of these therapies

    To assess short- and long-term safety (pharmacovigilance) of these therapies

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of currently used therapies for vitiligo (including combination therapies), providing a basis for better shared decision making and guidelines.

    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of currently used therapies for vitiligo (including combination therapies), providing a basis for better shared decision making and guidelines.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. To evaluate the impact of these therapies on vitiligo patients' quality of life

    To evaluate the impact of these therapies on vitiligo patients' quality of life

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. To attempt to identify risk factors associated with treatment failure

    To attempt to identify risk factors associated with treatment failure

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. To document disease trajectory and its relationship to demographic, phenotypic and treatment factors

    To document disease trajectory and its relationship to demographic, phenotypic and treatment factors

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. To develop predictors of rapidly progressive vitiligo

    To develop predictors of rapidly progressive vitiligo

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06218082
Lead sponsor
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2024
Start date
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Viktoria Eleftheriadou
Contact
viktoria.eleftheriadou@nhs.net
01902307999
Viktoria Eleftheriadou
principal investigator · The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion