CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06216197saddleUpdated Jan 22, 2024

Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Saddle Block

An interventional study of FENT group and DEX group in Regional Anesthesia Morbidity, sponsored by Zulekha Hospitals. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-22.

Sponsored by Zulekha Hospitals · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2021, registered Dec 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dexmedetomidine is recommended over fentanyl as adjunctive medication to bupivacaine for saddle block spinal anesthesia in anal surgeries and procedures.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: A saddle spinal block is a viable choice for anal surgeries. This technique effectively maintains balanced hemodynamics, and fast recovery, and prevents irrelevant motor blocks in both limbs.

Methods: Fifty-eight adult patients were categorized into two groups. Group FENT, consisting of 29 patients, underwent a saddle block with hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5 ml) combined with fentanyl (0.5 ml; 25 μg). The DEX Group, consisting of 29 patients, received 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (10 μg; 0.5 ml). Continuous monitoring of HR and SpO2 was conducted. Evaluation of sensory blockage and the motor block was done utilizing the Bromage scale. Following surgery, assessments were conducted. Pain in the ward and PACU was determined utilizing the visual analog scale (VAS).

02

Conditions studied

  • Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Zulekha Hospitals is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • both sexes
  • aged between 20 and 60
  • classified as II \& ASA-I
  • scheduled for elective anal surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects who refused to participate
  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • BMI > 30 kg/m2
  • heart failure (class IV or III) based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA)
  • uncorrected coagulopathy
  • any study's drug allergy
  • drug abuse
  • neuropathy
  • any spinal anesthesia contraindication (such as infection or a pelvic fracture)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    The FENT Group

    Group FENT, consisting of 29 patients, underwent a saddle block with hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5 ml) combined with fentanyl (0.5 ml; 25 μg).

    Drug: FENT group

  • Other
    The DEX Group

    The DEX Group, consisting of 29 patients, received 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (10 μg; 0.5 ml).

    Drug: DEX group

Interventions

  • DrugFENT group

    Group FENT, consisting of 29 patients, underwent a saddle block with hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5 ml) combined with fentanyl (0.5 ml; 25 μg).

    Also known as: fentanyl group

  • DrugDEX group

    The DEX Group, consisting of 29 patients, received 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine (10 μg; 0.5 ml).

    Also known as: dexmedetomidine group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the duration until the first call for analgesia

    the duration until the first call for analgesia

    Time frame: 20 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. the duration from spinal injection until reaching the maximal sensory level

    the duration from spinal injection until reaching the maximal sensory level

    Time frame: 20 months

  2. the duration needed for sensory regression to occur over two spinal segments from the maximal sensory level

    the duration needed for sensory regression to occur over two spinal segments from the maximal sensory level

    Time frame: 20 months

  3. the time required for sensory regression until reaching the S1 level (from the maximal sensory level)

    the time required for sensory regression until reaching the S1 level (from the maximal sensory level)

    Time frame: 20 months

  4. the duration from injection to achieving Bromage 0, the total tramadol consumption (until the first 24 hours)

    the duration from injection to achieving Bromage 0, the total tramadol consumption (until the first 24 hours)

    Time frame: 20 months

  5. side effects occurrences

    side effects occurrences

    Time frame: 20 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Al-Azhar faculty of medicine
    Cairo, 12546, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — available

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06216197
Lead sponsor
Zulekha Hospitals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2024
Start date
Apr 3, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 4, 2022
Completion
Dec 4, 2022
Last update
Jan 22, 2024

Study contacts

sameh ha seyam, MD
study chair · assistant professor of anesthesiology, intensive care and pain management

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion