CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06201039CLAWEDUpdated Jan 11, 2024

Continuous Local-anesthetic Wound Infusion for Neck Dissection

An interventional study of 0.5% Lidocaine Hydrochloride and 0.9% Normal Saline in Head and Neck Cancer, sponsored by Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-11.

Sponsored by Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of continuous local anesthetic wound infusion to improve quality of recovery following ablative surgery and neck dissection.

Read the detailed description

Bilateral cervical plexus catheters are convenient and safe to place under the direct vision of the surgeons during ablative and neck dissection. The investigators hypothesize that continuous local anesthetic wound infusion to block bilateral cervical plexus will improve quality of recovery following ablative surgery and neck dissection. The primary endpoint is the quality of recovery, which will be assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). Secondary endpoints include numeric pain scale, number and proportion of patients on salvage analgesics, Incidence of phrenic nerve block, Incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve block, length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, length of post-operative hospital stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancer
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 552 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 47 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 211 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Over age 18;
  • patients with head and neck cancer Undergoing ablative surgery and neck dissection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refuse;
  • Relatively contraindications: severe heart, liver, or kidney dysfunction, coagulation dysfunction, and local anesthetic allergy history;
  • Intervention unlikely to be effective: drug abuse history, receiving other types of nerve block treatment;
  • Unlikely to complete the follow-up: alcoholism, planned to replace WeChat and phone within three months; the expected life span less than three months;
  • Unable to cooperate with the questionnaire and use the patient-controlled analgesia pump.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CWI Block

    Prior to the end of neck dissection and any additional procedures, the bilateral catheter will be placed adjacent to the cervical plexus underneath the internal jugular vein, left in place for 24 hours and removed in a similar way to the Redon drainage by the surgeon. The Continuous placebo Wound Infusion (CWI) will start immediately at a speed of 4ml/h containing 0.5% lidocaine hydrochloride + 1:400000 adrenaline. • Intervention: Drug: 0.5% lidocaine hydrochloride at 4ml/h.

    Drug: 0.5% Lidocaine Hydrochloride

  • Placebo comparator
    CWI Placebo

    Control Intervention: Patients in the control arm will undergo the CWI procedure as well. The infusion will contain 0.9% normal saline + 1:400000 adrenaline at 4ml/h. • Intervention: Drug: 0.9% normal saline at 4ml/h.

    Drug: 0.9% Normal Saline

Interventions

  • Drug0.5% Lidocaine Hydrochloride

    Prior to the end of neck dissection and any additional procedures, the bilateral catheter will be placed adjacent to the cervical plexus underneath the internal jugular vein, left in place for 24 hours and removed in a similar way to the Redon drainage by the surgeon. The CWI block will start immediately at a speed of 4ml/h containing 0.5% lidocaine hydrochloride + 1:400000 adrenaline.

    Also known as: CWI Block

  • Drug0.9% Normal Saline

    Prior to the end of neck dissection and any additional procedures, the bilateral catheter will be placed adjacent to the cervical plexus underneath the internal jugular vein, left in place for 72 hours and removed in a similar way to the Redon drainage by the surgeon. The CWI placebo will start immediately at a speed of 4ml/h containing 0.9% normal saline + 1:400000 adrenaline.

    Also known as: CWI Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery

    The primary outcome will be the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15).

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative salvage analgesics

    Patients will be asked to complete a daily diary for 72 hours that records their daily postoperative salvage analgesics.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  2. Phrenic nerve block

    Patients will be asked to complete a daily diary for 72 hours that records their daily dyspnea.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  3. Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain

    Patients will be asked to complete a daily diary for 72 hours that records the numeric pain rating scale composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  4. Recurrent laryngeal nerve block

    Patients will be asked to complete a daily diary for 72 hours that records their daily hoarseness.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  5. Quality of Recovery

    The primary outcome will be the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15).

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) time

    Length of PACU stay

    Time frame: Intraoperative (At the end of surgery)

  2. Post-operative hospital time

    Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hinther A, Nakoneshny SC, Chandarana SP, Matthews TW, Hart R, Schrag C, Matthews J, McKenzie CD, Fick GH, Dort JC. Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 12;13(6):1266. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061266. PubMed 33809273 ↗
  • Gostian M, Loeser J, Albert C, Wolber P, Schwarz D, Grosheva M, Veith S, Goerg C, Balk M, Gostian AO. Postoperative Pain Treatment With Continuous Local Anesthetic Wound Infusion in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):553-560. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0327. PubMed 33830180 ↗
  • van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1437-49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm056. Epub 2007 Mar 12. PubMed 17355955 ↗
  • Wick EC, Grant MC, Wu CL. Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Pain Management With Nonopioid Analgesics and Techniques: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):691-697. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0898. PubMed 28564673 ↗
  • Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606. PubMed 9175983 ↗
  • McLeod RS, Aarts MA, Chung F, Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Conn LG, McCluskey S, McKenzie M, Morningstar B, Nadler A, Okrainec A, Pearsall EA, Sawyer J, Siddique N, Wood T. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guideline and Implementation Strategy Based on the Knowledge-to-action Cycle. Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1016-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001067. PubMed 25692358 ↗
  • Tan M, Law LS, Gan TJ. Optimizing pain management to facilitate Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;62(2):203-18. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0275-x. Epub 2014 Dec 10. PubMed 25501696 ↗
  • Ladha KS, Patorno E, Huybrechts KF, Liu J, Rathmell JP, Bateman BT. Variations in the Use of Perioperative Multimodal Analgesic Therapy. Anesthesiology. 2016 Apr;124(4):837-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001034. PubMed 26835644 ↗
  • Schwenk ES, Grant AE, Torjman MC, McNulty SE, Baratta JL, Viscusi ER. The Efficacy of Peripheral Opioid Antagonists in Opioid-Induced Constipation and Postoperative Ileus: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):767-777. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000671. PubMed 29016552 ↗
  • Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, Huber GF, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell MA, Simon C, Uppington J, Zygun D, Ljungqvist O, Harris J. Optimal Perioperative Care in Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction: A Consensus Review and Recommendations From the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):292-303. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981. PubMed 27737447 ↗
  • Telford RJ, Stoneham MD. Correct nomenclature of superficial cervical plexus blocks. Br J Anaesth. 2004 May;92(5):775; author reply 775-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh550. No abstract available. PubMed 15113770 ↗
  • Petrucci E, Cofini V, Pizzi B, Coletta R, Blasetti AG, Necozione S, Fusco P, Marinangeli F. Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block in the Management of Persistent Postoperative Pain Post Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial. Pain Physician. 2020 Jun;23(3):237-244. PubMed 32517389 ↗
  • Bhoi D, Bhatia R, Mohan VK, Thakar A, Kalagara R, Sikka K. Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block by Anterior Route for Perioperative Analgesia in Robotic Thyroidectomy by Retroauricular Approach: A Case Series. A A Pract. 2021 Aug 12;15(8):e01501. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001501. PubMed 34388135 ↗
  • Kim JS, Lee J, Soh EY, Ahn H, Oh SE, Lee JD, Joe HB. Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus-Intercostal Plane Block and Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block After Single-Incision Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):584-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000430. PubMed 27380104 ↗
  • Bu XS, Zhang J, Zuo YX. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale. Patient. 2016 Jun;9(3):251-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0148-6. PubMed 26518201 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06201039
Lead sponsor
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 11, 2024

Study contacts

Chen
Contact
153856346@qq.com
+8613922106109
Ruan
study director · The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion