CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06189365Updated Aug 13, 2026Results posted

Amplatzer Amulet China Post Market Study (PMS)

An observational study in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Terminated at 5 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Observational

Why this study was terminated
This study was terminated due to the shift in Sponsor's business strategy.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA occluder in a Chinese patient population indicated for use of this device.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained heart rhythm disorder. During AF, chaotic electrical activity results in rapid, uncoordinated, and insufficient contractions of the atrial chambers. Stagnation of blood flow in the left atrium (LA) can lead to hypercoagulability. The left atrial appendage (LAA), given its location and complex shape is often the primary site of stasis and thus increases the risk for thrombus formation. Approximately 90% of all thrombi in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) forming in the LA originate in the LAA.

Patients with NVAF are at an increased risk of systemic embolism and stoke due to the potential for clot forming in the LAA. OAC is the recommended first-line therapy for NVAF at increased risk of stroke, however, many patients have relative or absolute contraindications to taking OACs. LAAO offers a non-pharmacological option for stroke risk reduction in these patients unable to take OAC.

The Amulet occluder is Abbott's second-generation LAA occlusion device. It received CE Mark in 2013, and FDA approval in August 2021. Observational studies performed in multiple geographies show that the Amulet occluder can be safely implanted with good procedural outcomes and reduce the risk of stroke as compared to a predicted rate without the need for anticoagulation in most patients. This led to the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approval of the Amulet occluder in 2020.

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA occluder in a Chinese patient population indicated for use of this device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
  • NVAF
  • Amplatzer Amulet
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices is the lead sponsor of 525 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This clinical investigation will enroll subjects of all genders from the Chinese nationality general population ≥18 years old. Patients must meet all general eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent prior to sites conducting any investigation-specific procedures not considered standard of care.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Documented non-valvular atrial fibrillation and contraindicated for long-term oral anticoagulation, or in those who are taking oral warfarin but still develop stroke or relevant events
  2. Meets the current device indications and per physician discretion for Amulet implant
  3. Able to provide written Informed Consent prior to any study related procedures
  4. 18 years of age or older at the time of enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With the presence of intracardiac thrombus
  2. With active endocarditis or other infections producing bacteremia
  3. Patients whose low risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASC score is 0 or 1) or bleeding (HAS-BLED score \< 3)
  4. Where placement of the device would interfere with any intracardiac or intravascular structures
  5. Has a life expectancy of less than 2 years due to any condition
  6. Currently participating or planning on participating during the follow up period of this study in a clinical study that includes an active treatment arm or a concurrent clinical study which may confound the results of this trial
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder

    Subject will receive the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) closure procedure with Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder.

    Device: Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) closure procedure with Amplatzer Amulet LAA occluder

Interventions

  • DeviceLeft Atrial Appendage (LAA) closure procedure with Amplatzer Amulet LAA occluder

    Subject will receive the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) closure procedure with Amplatzer Amulet LAA occluder.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Short-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Major Adverse Events

    The primary short-term safety endpoint is the occurrence of one or more of the following major adverse events within 7 days after the procedure: all-cause mortality, procedure or device-related complications requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or systemic embolism.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Primary Long-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Device Embolization, Device Erosion, Significant Device Interference With Surrounding Structure, Device Thrombus, Device Fracture, Device Related Infections, Device Breakage, or Device Related Allergy

    The primary long-term safety endpoint is the occurrence of device embolization, device erosion, clinically significant device interference with surrounding structure, device thrombus, device fracture, device related infections (endocarditis and pericarditis), device breakage, or device related allergy through 2 years. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 2 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism

    The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism through 2 years. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 2 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

    Time frame: 2 years

Other outcomes

  1. Descriptive Endpoint: Composite of Damage to Blood Vessel or Organ or Damage to Adjacent Organs at Implant, Device Dislodgement, Device Fracture, Device Erosion, or Pericardial Tamponade

    Composite of damage to blood vessel or organ or damage to adjacent organs at implant, device dislodgement, device fracture, device erosion, or pericardial tamponade through 5 years post-procedure. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 5 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Descriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Success

    Rate of device success - defined as device deployed and implanted in correct position

    Time frame: During implant procedure, approximately 30 to 60 minutes

  3. Descriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Closure

    Rate of device closure - defined as residual jet around the device of ≤ 5mm, based on the 3-month transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) defined by Doppler flow

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Descriptive Endpoint: Percentage of Subjects Taking OAC or Antiplatelet Drugs

    Descriptive Endpoint: Percentage of subjects taking OAC or antiplatelet drugs through 5 years. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 5 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2026

Participant flow

A total of 50 subjects were enrolled across five investigational sites in China between January 30, 2024, and January 10, 2025.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Started50
Completed0
Not completed50

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrimary Short-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Major Adverse Events

The primary short-term safety endpoint is the occurrence of one or more of the following major adverse events within 7 days after the procedure: all-cause mortality, procedure or device-related complications requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or systemic embolism.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Primary Short-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Major Adverse Events
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Primary Short-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Major Adverse Events0
PrimaryPrimary Long-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Device Embolization, Device Erosion, Significant Device Interference With Surrounding Structure, Device Thrombus, Device Fracture, Device Related Infections, Device Breakage, or Device Related Allergy

The primary long-term safety endpoint is the occurrence of device embolization, device erosion, clinically significant device interference with surrounding structure, device thrombus, device fracture, device related infections (endocarditis and pericarditis), device breakage, or device related allergy through 2 years. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 2 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Primary Long-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Device Embolization, Device Erosion, Significant Device Interference With Surrounding Structure, Device Thrombus, Device Fracture, Device Related Infections, Device Breakage, or Device Related Allergy
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Primary Long-Term Safety Endpoint: Occurrence of Device Embolization, Device Erosion, Significant Device Interference With Surrounding Structure, Device Thrombus, Device Fracture, Device Related Infections, Device Breakage, or Device Related Allergy5
PrimaryPrimary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism

The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism through 2 years. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 2 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism0
Other pre-specifiedDescriptive Endpoint: Composite of Damage to Blood Vessel or Organ or Damage to Adjacent Organs at Implant, Device Dislodgement, Device Fracture, Device Erosion, or Pericardial Tamponade

Composite of damage to blood vessel or organ or damage to adjacent organs at implant, device dislodgement, device fracture, device erosion, or pericardial tamponade through 5 years post-procedure. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 5 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

Time frame:
5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Descriptive Endpoint: Composite of Damage to Blood Vessel or Organ or Damage to Adjacent Organs at Implant, Device Dislodgement, Device Fracture, Device Erosion, or Pericardial Tamponade
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Descriptive Endpoint: Composite of Damage to Blood Vessel or Organ or Damage to Adjacent Organs at Implant, Device Dislodgement, Device Fracture, Device Erosion, or Pericardial Tamponade0
Other pre-specifiedDescriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Success

Rate of device success - defined as device deployed and implanted in correct position

Time frame:
During implant procedure, approximately 30 to 60 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Descriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Success
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Descriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Success47
Other pre-specifiedDescriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Closure

Rate of device closure - defined as residual jet around the device of ≤ 5mm, based on the 3-month transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) defined by Doppler flow

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Descriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Closure
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Descriptive Endpoint: Rate of Device Closure20
Other pre-specifiedDescriptive Endpoint: Percentage of Subjects Taking OAC or Antiplatelet Drugs

Descriptive Endpoint: Percentage of subjects taking OAC or antiplatelet drugs through 5 years. The protocol-defined time frame for endpoint assessment was 5 years. However, the study was prematurely terminated at 1 year and 11 months after study initiation. As a result, the endpoint analysis was conducted using all available data collected up to the point of study termination, but was shorter than the planned observation period.

Time frame:
5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Descriptive Endpoint: Percentage of Subjects Taking OAC or Antiplatelet Drugs
ParticipantsAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Pre-Procedure — Oral anticoagulant42
Pre-Procedure — Single antiplatelet3
Pre-Procedure — Dual antiplatelet2
Pre-Procedure — No antithrombotic medication2
Discharge — Oral anticoagulant43
Discharge — Single antiplatelet3
Discharge — Dual antiplatelet3
Discharge — No antithrombotic medication0
3 months — Oral anticoagulant37
3 months — Single antiplatelet6
3 months — Dual antiplatelet3
3 months — No antithrombotic medication0
6 months — Oral anticoagulant22
6 months — Single antiplatelet14
6 months — Dual antiplatelet10
6 months — No antithrombotic medication0
12 months — Oral anticoagulant13
12 months — Single antiplatelet14
12 months — Dual antiplatelet4
12 months — No antithrombotic medication0

Adverse events

Collected over from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder1/50 (2%)10/50 (20%)8/50 (16%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders2/50
Congestive Heart FailureCardiac disorders2/50
PericarditisCardiac disorders1/50
Gastrointestinal BleedingGastrointestinal disorders1/50
Incarcerated Inguinal HerniaGastrointestinal disorders1/50
False AneurysmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/50
Intracerebral HaemorrhageNervous system disorders1/50
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/50
EmphysemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/50
Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/50
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAmulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Pericardial EffusionCardiac disorders2/50
Vascular Access Site BruisingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/50
ThrombusVascular disorders2/50
Vascular Access Site PainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/50
Laboratory Test AbnormalInvestigations1/50
Arteriovenous FistulaVascular disorders1/50
Peripheral Vein Thrombus ExtensionVascular disorders1/50

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Year)Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Mean68.7 ± 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
Female18
Male32
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian50
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Primary reason for seeking an alternative or unable to take long-term warfarin/other anticoagulant
Primary reason for seeking an alternative or unable to take long-term warfarin/other anticoagulant(Participants)Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
High bleeding risk42
Prior stroke on anticoagulant5
History of major or minor bleeding2
Subject's preference/lifestyle1
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong 518009, China
  • Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
    Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China
  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
    Changsha, Hunan 410013, China
  • Xiangya Hospital Zhuzhou Central South University
    Zhuzhou, Hunan 412007, China
  • Xianyang Hospital Of Yan'an University
    Xianyang, Shaanxi, China
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 26, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 3, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06189365
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 3, 2024
Start date
Jan 30, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2025
Completion
Dec 5, 2025
Results posted
Jul 2, 2026
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Zhihui ZHANG
principal investigator · The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion