CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06167551Updated Dec 18, 2023

The Effect of 3 Different Auditory Applications on Newborn Heel Prick Procedure

An interventional study of mother lullaby group and white noise group in Newborn Pain, sponsored by Namik Kemal University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 24 Hours to 72 Hours, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-18.

Sponsored by Namik Kemal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
24 Hours to 72 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In pain management of neonates in interventional applications, health professionals should be able to evaluate pain, reduce or eliminate pain. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods are used in pain management. Pharmacological, opioid analgesics, sedatives and local anesthetics are used. Nonpharmacologic methods include breastfeeding, giving pacifiers, oral sucrose, music, massage, therapeutic touch and nesting, positioning such as fetal positioning, wrapping, kangaroo care, rocking and cradling.

Music makes positive changes in oxygen saturation level and peak heart rate values and reduces stress and pain. Classical music with light rhythmic emphasis and steady rhythm accompanied by a simple human voice or a single instrument, music performed by female vocalists (mother's voice, lullabies with female voice) and white noise similar to intrauterine sounds are among the types of music that have a positive effect on newborns.

This study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental design to compare the lullaby, classical music and white noise song by the mother to the newborn before and during heel prick blood collection with the control group and to determine which application gives superior results to the newborn's pain level, crying time and physiological parameters.

Read the detailed description

In pain management of newborns in interventional applications, health professionals should be able to evaluate pain and reduce or eliminate pain. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods are used in the management of pain. Non-pharmacological methods: practices such as breastfeeding, giving a pacifier, giving oral sucrose, listening to music, massage, therapeutic touching and nesting, positioning the fetus such as wrapping, giving kangaroo care, rocking and holding.

The newborn's response to sound often leads to changes in breathing and heart rate. Mild to moderate sounds (55-75 dB), such as speech and music, cause a decrease in heart rate and create an orientation response. Music makes positive changes in oxygen saturation level and heart rate peak values, and also reduces stress and pain. Arnon et al. determined that letting newborns in intensive care listen to music has a positive effect on reducing pain and anxiety, making it easier for newborns to fall asleep and increasing their sleep quality. Classical music with a light rhythmic emphasis and constant rhythm accompanied by a simple human voice or a single instrument, music performed by female vocalists (mother's voice, lullabies with a female voice) and white noise similar to intrauterine sounds are among the types of music that have a positive effect on newborns.

Heel prick pricking in newborns causes pain, which results in increased blood pressure and pulse rate, decreased SpO2, and crying. For this reason, this study was designed as a randomized controlled experimental design to compare the classical music and white noise and lullaby applications to the newborn before and during heel blood collection with the control group and to determine which application provides superior results on the newborn's pain level, crying duration and physiological parameters.

Research Purpose and Type This research was planned as a randomized controlled experimental design to compare the lullaby, classical music and white noise aplications to the newborn during the heel prick prick procedure with the control group.

Research Variables Independent variables; Lullaby your mother sings, white noise, classical music Dependent variables; Heart rate peak (HRV), oxygen saturation (SpO2), NIPS score, NIAPAS score, crying duration.

Place and Time to Conduct the Research The research will be carried out between February 2024 and June 2024 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Gaziantep Cengiz Gökçek Gynecology and Children's Hospital.

The population of the research It will create term newborns born at 38-42 weeks of gestation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Gaziantep Cengiz Gökçek Gynecology and Children's Hospital between February 2024 and June 2024. Postpartum 24-72. These are the newborns whose heel blood will be taken during Sample; The sample number of the study was determined by power analysis. The thesis study, which evaluated the effect of different auditory interventions on pain in heel blood collection in newborns, was taken as an example. According to the NIPS pain assessment scale used in the study, the average score of the results during the procedure was 4.26±2.16 in the 1st experimental group, 4.81±2.18 in the 2nd experimental group, 5.02±2.00 in the 3rd experimental group, and 5.93±1.32 in the control group. In this study, it was anticipated that the NIPS score average difference would have a large effect size (.95 large effect), with a 5% alpha margin of error (two-sided) and 80% power, and in the calculation of the number of samples made in the G*Power (3.1.9.2.) program, each It was determined that 20 babies should be included in a group, 80 babies in total. Considering that there may be sample loss for any reason during the research, the aim is to reach 96 newborns (24 babies in each group) by increasing the number of babies by 20% and using statistical parametric analysis methods.

The sample will be randomly selected from the study population. In the study, randomization will be performed using the URN method, which is considered equivalent to the full randomization method. Although this method is shown as UD, it includes two parameters, α and β. These represent balls of two different colors (for example: red and white). α can be white or red, while β will be the exact opposite of the chosen ball colour. One of the balls is chosen randomly, and if the selected ball is white, the subject is assigned to the α group, and if it is red, the subject is assigned to the β group. This selection process is repeated to determine which group the subject will be in.

In the research, the red ball will be the mother's lullaby (intervention group 1), the yellow ball will be white noise (intervention group 2), the blue ball will be classical music (intervention group 3), and the white ball will be the control group. When there is a baby in the clinic that meets the sample selection conditions, these balls prepared by the researcher will be placed in an invisible, dark-colored bag and a random nurse working in the ward will be able to make the selection without seeing it. Which group the baby will be placed in will be determined by the color of the ball coming out of the bag, and the babies will be distributed randomly to the groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Newborn Pain

Keywords

  • newborn
  • heel prick
  • music
  • pain care
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Namik Kemal University is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
24 Hours to 72 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • The newborn must be between 38-42 weeks and weigh appropriately for his/her week (Appropriate Gestational Age - AGA),
  • Not taking any analgesic, sedative or anticonvulsant medication for at least 6 hours before,
  • Feeding at least 1 hour before,
  • No fever,
  • Not receiving oxygen therapy,
  • Not receiving antibiotic treatment
  • No congenital anomalies
  • Not next to the bed or under the heater
  • Not receiving phototherapy,
  • Not being connected to a mechanical ventilator

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of congenital anomaly,
  • Having a chest tube inserted,
  • Intracranial bleeding,
  • Presence of anomaly that may cause deafness
  • Those with a history of epileptic seizures will be excluded.
  • The patient's family refuses to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    mother lullaby group

    group listening to mother's lullaby

    Other: mother lullaby group

  • Experimental
    white noise group

    group listening to white noise

    Other: white noise group

  • Experimental
    classical music group

    group listening to classical music

    Other: classical music group

  • Other
    Control group

    No intervation

    Other: Contol Group

Interventions

  • Othermother lullaby group

    mother's lullaby: the mother will be made to sing her own lullaby 5 minutes before the heel prick.

  • Otherwhite noise group

    white noise: 5 minutes before taking heel prick blood, white noise will be started to be played on an MP3 player with white noise. The MP3 player will be placed in the crib where the baby lies, at the baby's bedside, at least 20 cm away from the baby's head. After the MP3 player is turned on, the sound level will be measured at the baby's ear level with a decibel meter and adjusted so that it does not exceed 70 decibels.

  • Otherclassical music group

    classical music: 5 minutes before heel prick, classical music will be started to be played from the MP3 player with white noise. The MP3 will be placed inside the crib where the baby lies, at the baby's bedside, at least 20 cm away from the baby's head. After the MP3 player is turned on, the sound level will be measured at the baby's ear level with a decibel meter and adjusted so that it does not exceed 70 decibels.

  • OtherContol Group

    No intervation

    Also known as: No intervation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cardiac apex beat (HRV)

    HRV will be evaluated before and during heel blood collection. It will be recorded by the researcher during the blood collection process.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before heel blood collection and at 1, 3 and 5 minutes during heel blood collection.

  2. Oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    SpO2 will be evaluated before and during heel blood collection. It will be recorded by the researcher during the blood collection process.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before heel blood collection and at 1, 3 and 5 minutes during heel blood collection.

  3. NIPS scale score

    The scale is used to evaluate pain due to procedures performed in term and premature babies. NIPS consists of sections that evaluate 6 behaviors against pain (crying, breathing pattern, arm and leg movements and alertness). Although the total score varies between 0-7, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: NIPS will be evaluated 5 minutes before the heel prick and at 1, 3 and 5 minutes during the heel prick.

  4. NIAPAS scale score

    NIAPAS scale measures acute pain; It is a scale that includes five behavioral and three physiological indicators given the week of gestation as a contextual factor. As a result of the scoring of the indicators, the score that can be obtained from the scale is between 0-18. Pain intensity is classified as mild pain (0-5), moderate pain (6-9) and severe pain (10-18).

    Time frame: NIAPAS will be evaluated 5 minutes before the heel prick and at 1, 3 and 5 minutes during the heel prick.

  5. Crying time

    The baby's crying time will be monitored and recorded.

    Time frame: The baby's crying time will be 5 minutes before the heel prick and 5 minutes during the heel prick.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arnon S, Shapsa A, Forman L, Regev R, Bauer S, Litmanovitz I, Dolfin T. Live music is beneficial to preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):131-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00090.x. PubMed 16732778 ↗
  • Balcı, S. (2006). Beyaz Gürültünün Kolikli Bebeklerde Etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Balcı, S., Dur, Ş., Özdemir, Ş., & Kavuncuoğlu, S. (2021). The effect of two different lancets and heel warming on duration of crying and procedure time during blood sampling: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 27(6), 426-431.
  • Derebent, E., & Yiğit, R. (2008). Yenidoğanda Non-Farmakolojik Ağrı Yönetimi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi, 22(2), 113.
  • Gilad, E., & Arnon, S. (2010). The role of live music and singing as a stress-reducing modality in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. Music and Medicine, 2(1), 18-22
  • Gooding, L. F. (2010). Using music therapy protocols in the treatment of premature infants: An introduction to current practices. The arts in Psychotherapy, 37(3), 211-214
  • İmseytoğlu, D., & Yıldız, S. (2012). YENİDOĞAN YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTELERİNDE MÜZİK TERAPİ. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 20(2), 160-165.
  • Kanbur BN, Mutlu B, Salihoglu O. Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Infant Acute Pain Assessment Scale (NIAPAS) in Turkish: prospective study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 Jul-Aug;139(4):305-311. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0721.R1.23122020. PubMed 34346962 ↗
  • Uyar M, Akin Korhan E. [The effect of music therapy on pain and anxiety in intensive care patients]. Agri. 2011 Oct;23(4):139-46. doi: 10.5505/agri.2011.94695. Turkish. PubMed 22290677 ↗
  • Standley, J. M. (2012). A discussion of evidence-based music therapy to facilitate feeding skills of premature infants: The power of contingent music. The arts in Psychotherapy, 39(5), 379-382.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06167551
Lead sponsor
Namik Kemal University
Responsible party
Zeynem YILDIRIM BALKAN (Dr. Lecturer and Principal Investigator, Namik Kemal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2023

Study contacts

Zeynem YILDIRIM BALKAN, PHD
Contact
zyildirim@nku.edu.tr
+905073190958
Serap ÖZDEMİR, PHD
Contact
serap8685@hotmail.com
+905375438610
Serap BALCI, PHD
study director · ISTANBUL UNİVERSİTY CERRAHPAŞA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion