CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06156215PROBOOSTVAXEDUpdated Sep 12, 2025Results posted

PROmotion of COVID-19 BOOSTer VA(X)Ccination in the Emergency Department - PROBOOSTVAXED

An interventional study of Vaccine Messaging and Vaccine Acceptance Question in COVID-19, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-12.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
919
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this cluster randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of messaging interventions to increase booster vaccine uptake in adults in the emergency department(ED). The main question[s] and goals of this study are:

  • does the intervention of vaccine messaging increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit?
  • does the intervention of asking about vaccine acceptance increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit?
  • considering recent national changes to funding and availability of updated vaccines, the investigators will examine the effects of these changes on vaccine acceptance and uptake in ED populations. Specifically, they will stratify EDs and ED patients according to the ED availability of vaccines, and they will also examine whether costs and availability of vaccines are a deterrent to patient acceptance and uptake of vaccines
Read the detailed description

I. Overview On January 22, 2020, Acting Health and Human Services Secretary Norris Cochran declared COVID-19 a national public health emergency, an action that eventually enabled emergency authorization for free COVID-19 vaccines, testing and treatments. This public health declaration has been renewed seven times for 90-day intervals, as required under section 319 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. Under this declaration over the past two years, the US government has provided full support and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics (antibody therapies, remdesivir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), such that they have been widely available and free of charge to all Americans. Although these measures have not, by any means, ended the pandemic, it is clear from multiple epidemiologic modeling studies that they have decreased hospitalizations and saved hundreds of thousands of lives. They have also led to a narrowing of the profound morbidity and mortality disparities gap that was seen in minority populations in the first two waves of the pandemic.

The PROCOVAXED trial was a multicenter study that sought to decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake through the use of vaccine messaging platforms in the emergency department (ED). In this trial, investigators found that implementation of our COVID-19 messaging platforms (videos, information sheets and scripted, direct messaging) were associated with greater COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake among unvaccinated ED patients (Rodriguez RM, Nichol G, Eucker SA, et al. Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging Platforms in Emergency Departments on Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(2):115-123. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5909).

In January 2022, the investigators extended PROCOVAXED by shifting the focus to vaccinated ED patients to examine the timely and critically important topic of booster vaccine hesitancy in underserved ED populations. To better characterize COVID-19 booster hesitancy, the investigators performed a cross-sectional study at five high-volume, safety-net hospital EDs in four cities (San Francisco, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Durham, NC) using survey tools to gather quantitative data on vaccination status, demographic variables, usual source of care, and attitudes toward booster vaccination. Of 771 participants who had completed their full initial series, 316 (41%) had not received any booster vaccine. Among these 316 non-boosted participants, 179 (57%, 95% CI 51-62) stated they would decline or were unsure whether they would accept a booster vaccine if it was offered to them (i.e., booster-hesitant). Investigators found the following associations with booster vaccine hesitancy: age 35-49 years vs age 18-34 years (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99-1.36); Asian vs White race (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.93); Hispanic/Latino vs White ethnicity (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.82-3.09); primary language non-English vs English (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.71); and Republican vs Democrat party affiliation (OR 6.07, 95% CI 4.21-8.75). The three most common reasons for booster vaccine hesitancy were a preference to wait for more information (25%), concerns about side effects and safety (24%), and "I don't need one because I'm fully vaccinated" (20%).

Recognizing the ED as a unique opportunity to address COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy in underserved populations, the investigators will launch the PROmotion of COVID-19 BOOSTer VA(X)ccination in the Emergency Department (PROBOOSTVAXED) trial as an extension of the PROCOVAXED trial, seeking to increase COVID-19 booster vaccine acceptance and uptake among vaccinated ED patients. Because of Omicron variant-associated surges during the COVID-19 pandemic with corresponding research staff illness and ED overcrowding, the investigators found wide week-to-week fluctuations in enrollment in the PROCOVAXED study. To reduce this variability of enrollment, the investigators have changed the unit of randomization from 1-week to 1-day in the PROBOOSTVAXED trial.

As of May 11, 2023, the COVID-19 public health emergency ended. Consequently, not only are the costs for vaccines, testing, and treatments shifted to health insurers and patients via commercial payment mechanisms, but COVID-19 vaccines are no longer available in some EDs. Since our research focuses on the delivery and availability of vaccines to underserved populations whose only health care access occurs in EDs, the team believes that this represents a potential barrier to 30-day vaccine uptake in these populations. The investigators have been informed that only some of the PROBOOSTVAXED study sites will have COVID-19 vaccines available for distribution in the ED, and this availability is subject to change throughout the study period. Nevertheless, the team will proceed with the same research protocol, however, the investigators feel it is important to examine how ED vaccine availability will affect 30-day vaccine uptake in underserved populations. They will therefore be performing additional subgroup analyses that compare 30-day vaccine uptake among sites with available COVID-19 vaccine to those without for the intervention and control arms.They will also evaluate whether patient costs of vaccines are a deterrent to acceptance and uptake.

While the sample size calculation for this research is derived from Aim 1, the investigators emphasize that this is a pragmatic study in which they seek to evaluate the fluid real-world changes in COVID-19 vaccine availability and funding. As stated above, there have been (and likely will continue to be) changes in payment for and availability of vaccines in EDs.

The investigators therefore have developed our protocol and aims below to assess the impact of these changes.

Aim1: To determine whether implementation of COVID-19 booster vaccine trusted messaging platforms is associated with increased booster vaccine uptake in ED patients. At five EDs (Zuckerberg San Francisco General, UCSF Parnassus Medical Center [San Francisco, CA], Thomas Jefferson University Hospital [Philadelphia, PA], Ben Taub Hospital [Houston, TX], Duke University Medical Center [Durham, NC]), investigators will conduct a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms, with 30-day booster vaccine uptake as the primary outcome and booster vaccine uptake in the ED as a secondary outcome. Hypothesis: Implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms in EDs will be associated with increased 30-day booster vaccine uptake in vaccinated ED patients.

Aim 1a: To determine whether implementation of COVID-19 booster vaccine trusted messaging platforms in EDs is associated with increased booster vaccine acceptance in ED patients. For this aim, booster vaccine acceptance in the ED assessed via ED survey will be the primary outcome. Hypothesis: Implementation of PROBOOSTVAXED trusted messaging platforms in EDs will be associated with increased booster vaccine acceptance in ED patients.

Aim 2: To determine whether implementation of a protocol in which ED patients are asked whether they will accept a COVID-19 booster vaccine in the ED is associated with increased booster vaccine uptake in ED patients. Hypothesis: Implementation of an ED protocol in which patients are asked whether they will accept a COVID-19 booster vaccine will be associated with increased 30-day booster vaccine uptake in ED patients.

Aim 3: To compare vaccine uptake (during the index ED visit and 30 days post visit) between sites that have COVID-19 booster vaccine available and those that do not.

Aim 3a: To compare vaccine acceptance and 30-day uptake among patients with health insurance versus those without health insurance (evaluating the effects of patient vaccine cost on acceptance and uptake).

Aim 4: To compare COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this current study with data gathered in our previous COVID-19 vaccine messaging trial.

General Design: This is a three-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT).

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • health disparities
  • booster vaccines
  • healthcare access
  • vaccination
  • public health
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 919 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Presenting to ED
  3. No receipt of COVID-19 booster within prior 6 months
  4. Able to provide informed consent
  5. Fluent in English or Spanish
  6. Anticipated ability to complete study intervention in ED i.e., able to watch a 3-minute videoclip

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major trauma such that it will preclude survey
  2. Inability to participate in a survey because of intoxication, altered mental status, or critical illness
  3. Incarceration
  4. Psychiatric hold
  5. Patients who state that they have already received a bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine or other COVID-19 vaccine within the prior 6 months
  6. Patients who are in the ED for suspected acute COVID-19
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
919 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)

    * Vaccine messaging * Vaccine acceptance question All patients will receive an Intake Survey assessing their demographic and vaccination information. At the end of the Intake Survey, the Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC) will deliver the booster vaccine information flyer and ask the patient if they will watch a short video on booster vaccines. If they agree, the CRC will give them a QR code to view the video on their smartphone or an iPad. After finishing with the video, the CRC will tell the subject that they will be back for the Vaccine Acceptance survey. The CRC will then leave the room and ask the patient's primary provider to deliver the booster vaccine scripted message. This message is short and should not significantly impact provider workflow. Vaccine Acceptance Survey (Post-Intervention) in the ED: We will administer the Vaccine Acceptance Survey at 30 minutes to 3 hours after the Intake Survey.

    Behavioral: Vaccine Messaging · Behavioral: Vaccine Acceptance Question

  • Active comparator
    Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)

    * No vaccine messaging * Vaccine acceptance question asked in the Vaccine Acceptance Survey Vaccine Acceptance Survey: We will administer the Vaccine Acceptance Survey at some time (generally 30 minutes but up to 3 hours) after the Intake Survey. The surveys in the control group retain the same key primary and secondary outcome questions as in the intervention group Vaccine Acceptance surveys.

    Behavioral: Vaccine Acceptance Question

  • No intervention
    Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)

    * No vaccine messaging * No vaccine acceptance question The workflow during this arm is identical to the Intervention Q arm except there will be no Vaccine Acceptance Question survey.

Interventions

  • BehavioralVaccine Messaging

    1. Video clips - short (approximately 3-minute) Public Service Announcement type videos to be viewed by participant using a QR code on their smartphone. If no smartphone is available, the video will be shown to the participant on an iPad. 2. Printed materials - one page information sheets handed to subjects by CRCs. 3. Face to face messaging - short (\< 1 minute), scripted message from the patient's providers in the ED (nurse or provider) Each site will maintain a library of A. 5 versions of the videos - the version used in any participant will be tailored to that participant's stated race/ethnicity. B. 5 versions of printed flyers - likewise, the version will be tailored to the participant's stated race/ethnicity. C. 1 version of scripted message to be delivered in English or Spanish.

  • BehavioralVaccine Acceptance Question

    The last question in the Vaccine Acceptance Survey in both the Intervention M and Intervention Q arms of the study is "Would you accept the COVID-19 booster vaccine in the emergency department today if your doctor asked you?"

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake

    Our primary outcome is booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention M arm with Control

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number or Participants Receiving Booster Vaccination in the ED

    Booster vaccine uptake in the ED on the day of the index visit, M arm versus control and Q arm versus control

    Time frame: day of index visit

  2. Number of Participants Stating They Would Accept Vaccine in the ED

    A response of "yes" to the question, "Would you accept the booster vaccine in the emergency department today if your doctor asked you?"), comparing M and Q arms

    Time frame: on the day of index ED visit

  3. Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake, Q Arm

    Booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention Q arm with Control

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Results

Posted Sep 12, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBen Taub HospitalDuke University HospitalJefferson University HospitalJefferson Methodist HospitalUCSF Parnassus Medical CenterZuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
Started1321472943169174
Randomized to intervention m34508403763
Randomized to intervention q52438417156
Randomized to control465412626155
Completed1181402793158154
Not completed1471501120
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject244022
Withdrew: Left ed without completing study9390816
Withdrew: Physician decision100000
Withdrew: Became or found ineligible202012

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake

Our primary outcome is booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention M arm with Control

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake
ParticipantsPROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake1410
SecondaryNumber or Participants Receiving Booster Vaccination in the ED

Booster vaccine uptake in the ED on the day of the index visit, M arm versus control and Q arm versus control

Time frame:
day of index visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number or Participants Receiving Booster Vaccination in the ED
ParticipantsPROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)
Number or Participants Receiving Booster Vaccination in the ED870
SecondaryNumber of Participants Stating They Would Accept Vaccine in the ED

A response of "yes" to the question, "Would you accept the booster vaccine in the emergency department today if your doctor asked you?"), comparing M and Q arms

Time frame:
on the day of index ED visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Stating They Would Accept Vaccine in the ED
ParticipantsPROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)
Number of Participants Stating They Would Accept Vaccine in the ED7390
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake, Q Arm

Booster vaccine uptake (at any vaccination location) within 30 days after participants' index ED visit, comparing Intervention Q arm with Control

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake, Q Arm
ParticipantsIntervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)
Number of Participants With 30-day Booster Vaccine Uptake, Q Arm1110

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)0/247 (0%)0/247 (0%)0/247 (0%)
Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)0/273 (0%)0/273 (0%)0/273 (0%)
Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)0/332 (0%)0/332 (0%)0/332 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

individuals randomized, not withdrawn

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)Total
Median46 (33 to 62)49 (33 to 61)46 (33 to 61)46.5 (33 to 62.5)
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)Total
Woman136142186464
Man107129143379
Other4239
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)Total
Black8385119287
American Indian, Alaska Native3025
Asian12201648
Latinx486161170
Middle Eastern0000
Native hawaiian/ Pacific Islander44412
White (non-Latinx)101107137345
Other681024
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PROBOOSTVAXED Intervention M (Messaging + Vaccine Question)Intervention Q (Vaccine Question, No Messaging)Control (No Messaging, No Vaccine Question)Total
United States247273332852
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • San Francisco General Hospital Emergency Department
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
  • University of California San Francisco Parnassus
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Duke University Hospital
    Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Jefferson Torresdale Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19114, United States
  • Jefferson Methodist Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19148, United States
  • Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Molina MF, Eucker SA, Rising KL, Kean ER, Rafique Z, Mesbah H, Glidden DV, Arreguin MI, Alvarez C, Rodriguez RM. COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Messaging in Emergency Departments: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2537655. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37655. PubMed 41091465 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 28, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified data will be made available after review of formal request.

Supporting information: Study protocol

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06156215
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Pfizer, Duke University, Baylor College of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 5, 2023
Start date
Jan 19, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2024
Completion
Aug 18, 2024
Results posted
Sep 12, 2025
Last update
Sep 12, 2025

Study contacts

Robert Rodriguez, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion