CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06142110Updated Nov 24, 2023

The Relationship Between Functional Movement and Respiratory Muscle Strength

An interventional study of Funcional movement screen and Respiratory muscle strength in Functional Movement Quality, Respiratory Muscle Strength and Core Stability, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to male participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-24.

Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Nov 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a battery used for injury prediction, identifying asymmetry and weak connections in basic functional movement patterns. The muscles assessed in FMS are also respiratory muscles. Therefore, FMS scores were thought to be related to respiratory muscle strength. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship between Functional Movement Screen and respiratory muscles strength in professional football players and sedentary individuals.

Read the detailed description

Predicting and preventing sports injuries is very important for football players to maintain high performance. The measurement methods used to predict the injury probabilities of football players are quite expensive. However, in recent years, the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), used as an injury estimation tool in football players, can be easily applied in the field without the need for expensive equipment.

FMS is a biomechanical screening and evaluation method to reveal the limitations and asymmetries on the 7 basic movement patterns, which are the determinants of functional movement quality. FMS test battery aims to evaluate movements that require muscle strength, flexibility, range of motion, coordination, balance and proprioception. In the test; joint range of motion, asymmetry of motion, trunk strength and stabilization, balance, neuromuscular coordination, flexibility and dynamic flexibility properties are determined in a non-invasive, easy and economical way. Spine and core stabilization skills are exhibited in the movements included in the FMS.

In the literature, there is no study examining the relationship between respiratory muscle strength and FMS in football players and healthy individuals. However, respiratory mechanics play an important role in posture and spine stabilization have been shown.

Many functional activities in sports require trunk stabilization to transfer force symmetrically between the extremities. Impaired postural control, poor balance, lack of proprioception, and poor motor control have been shown to cause pain and disability and interfere with normal movement . Primary or accessory respiratory muscles; diaphragm, intercostal muscles, serratus anterior and posterior, pectorals, abdominal wall muscles also contribute to core and body stabilization. Therefore, it was thought that there may be a relationship between inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength and the quality of movements requiring trunk stabilization, balance and symmetry. In order to reveal this relationship, it is necessary to examine the relationship between FMS scores and respiratory muscle strength of trained/untrained individuals with different body types and movement patterns. Based on these assumptions, this study aimed to examine the FMS scores and respiratory muscles strength to investigate relationship between functional movement quality and respiratory muscles in professional football players and sedentary individuals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Movement Quality
  • Respiratory Muscle Strength
  • Core Stability
  • Injury

Keywords

  • Functional movement
  • Respiratory muscle
  • core
  • injury
  • sports
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy professional football players, healthy sedantery individuals

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with Cardiovascular, respiratory disease, inflammatory disease, smokers and acute injury
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Assessment of professional football player

    Respiratory muscle strength and functional movement quality of professional football players were evaluated. Functional movement screen and portable spirometer were used for evaluation.

    Other: Funcional movement screen · Diagnostic Test: Respiratory muscle strength

  • Active comparator
    Assessment of sedantery individuals

    Respiratory muscle strength and functional movement quality of sedantery individuals were evaluated. Functional movement screen and portable spirometer were used for evaluation.

    Other: Funcional movement screen · Diagnostic Test: Respiratory muscle strength

Interventions

  • OtherFuncional movement screen

    FMS is a biomechanical screening and evaluation method to reveal the limitations and asymmetries on the 7 basic movement patterns, which are the determinants of functional movement quality.

  • Diagnostic testRespiratory muscle strength

    Respiratory muscle strength was assessed with an additional mouthpiece attached to the portable spirometer as maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional movement Screen

    FMS was designed to identify asymmetries, limitations and compensations of the football players throughout the movement pattern, not in the joints. It consists of seven basic movements; Deep squad, hurdle steps, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg rise, trunk stability push up, and rotator stability. The FMS tests are scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with the sum creating a composite score ranging from 0 to 21 points. Higher scores mean better conditions

    Time frame: from enrollment to the end of assessment for 1 day

  2. Respiratory muscle strength

    Respiratory muscle strength is evaluated by individuals performing maximal expiration and inspiratory maneuvers.

    Time frame: from enrollment to the end of assessment for 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pamukkale University
    Denizli, 20000, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06142110
Lead sponsor
Pamukkale University
Responsible party
Erhan KIZMAZ (Research assistant, Pamukkale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2023
Completion
Mar 30, 2023
Last update
Nov 24, 2023

Study contacts

Fatma Ünver, Professor
principal investigator · Pamukkale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion