CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06127160Updated Aug 3, 2026Results posted

Patient-Directed Antimicrobial Duration in Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cephalexin and Cephalexin or placebo in Pyelonephritis Acute, sponsored by Brett A Faine. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Brett A Faine · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This pilot study will randomize 40 female patients with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis to receive standard duration of therapy versus patient-directed antimicrobial duration (PDAD). The primary objectives of this pilot trial are to determine the feasibility and safety of conducting a full-scale multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Following informed consent, patients will be randomized to receive 10 days of cephalexin or PDAD (minimum of 3 days of cephalexin followed by placebo once patient reports 24 hours of symptom resolution). Patients will be evaluated at day 1 in-person, then daily using a mobile cellphone application to assess acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (AUP) symptoms and quality of life (QOL). Urine samples will be collected at in-person visits at day 1, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks. Study feasibility will be assessed through day 90.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pyelonephritis Acute

Keywords

  • cephalexin
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Brett A Faine is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Females between 18 and 55 years of age
  • Diagnosis of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis
  • Can be discharged home on oral antimicrobial treatment
  • Ability to provide written informed consent in English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

  • Took antibiotics in the prior 48 hours
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes
  • End-stage liver disease
  • If the patient reports a penicillin allergy, and is deemed to be high-risk using the penicillin allergy clinical decision rule (PEN-FAST)
  • Serious allergy (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis) to the study medication or a similarly reported allergy to a cephalosporin
  • Known or identified hydronephrosis, obstruction, or abscess identified by emergency department ultrasound
  • Presence of a kidney stone
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/min)
  • Renal transplantation
  • Complicated pyelonephritis (defined anatomical or functional abnormality of the urinary tract that predisposes to infection)
  • Need for additional antimicrobial therapy for a coexisting infection
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, with either a recent (in the past 6 months) acquired immune deficiency syndrome-defining condition or a cluster of differentiation-4 (CD-4+) T lymphocyte count \<200/mm\^3
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Duration Treatment

    Drug: Cephalexin

  • Experimental
    Patient-directed antimicrobial duration (PDAD)

    Drug: Cephalexin or placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCephalexin

    Cephalexin 1000 mg by mouth 3 times daily for 10 days

  • DrugCephalexin or placebo

    Cephalexin 1000 mg by mouth 3 times daily for a minimum of 3 days, once participant reports symptom resolution for 24 hours they will switch to placebo for remainder of 10 days of treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Completing All Clinical Trial Activities and Follow-up

    Percentage of participants that complete all study activities and follow-up through 90 days

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sustained Clinical Cure

    Participant does not require any additional antimicrobial treatment and they do not have a recurrence of symptoms after initial clinical improvement.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Sustained Microbiological Cure Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,

    The bacterial pathogen found at trial entry is sustained to fewer than 1000 CFU/mL.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Clinical Cure Rate at the End of Treatment

    Participant does not require any additional antimicrobial treatment and they do not have a recurrence of symptoms after initial clinical improvement AND the bacterial pathogen found at trial entry is reduced to fewer than 1000 CFU/mL.

    Time frame: 15-21 days

  4. Microbiological Cure Rate at End of Treatment Defined as Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,

    Time frame: Day 15-21

  5. Additional Health Care Visits With the Chief Complaint of Urinary Tract Infection

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Results

Posted Aug 3, 2026
Limitations and caveats
1. This was a pilot RCT designed to establish feasibility of conducing a larger trial and detect major safety concerns and was not powered to test non-inferiority or detect meaningful differences in clinical and AE outcomes. 2. Baseline urine cultures were frequently contaminated, precluding evaluation of microbiologic outcomes for all enrolled participants.

Participant flow

We conducted a double-blind, pilot randomized trial at three U.S. emergency departments (EDs) at academic medical centers from 2024-25.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Started1920
End of treatment visit (14 days)1917
Test of cure visit (30 days)1717
Completed1716
Not completed24

Outcome measures

PrimaryFeasibility of Completing All Clinical Trial Activities and Follow-up

Percentage of participants that complete all study activities and follow-up through 90 days

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of Completing All Clinical Trial Activities and Follow-up
ParticipantsFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Feasibility of Completing All Clinical Trial Activities and Follow-up1716
SecondarySustained Clinical Cure

Participant does not require any additional antimicrobial treatment and they do not have a recurrence of symptoms after initial clinical improvement.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sustained Clinical Cure
ParticipantsFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Sustained Clinical Cure1416
SecondarySustained Microbiological Cure Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,

The bacterial pathogen found at trial entry is sustained to fewer than 1000 CFU/mL.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sustained Microbiological Cure Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,
ParticipantsFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Sustained Microbiological Cure Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,1011
SecondaryClinical Cure Rate at the End of Treatment

Participant does not require any additional antimicrobial treatment and they do not have a recurrence of symptoms after initial clinical improvement AND the bacterial pathogen found at trial entry is reduced to fewer than 1000 CFU/mL.

Time frame:
15-21 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Cure Rate at the End of Treatment
ParticipantsFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Clinical Cure Rate at the End of Treatment1517
SecondaryMicrobiological Cure Rate at End of Treatment Defined as Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,
Time frame:
Day 15-21
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Microbiological Cure Rate at End of Treatment Defined as Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,
ParticipantsFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Microbiological Cure Rate at End of Treatment Defined as Defined as the Bacterial Pathogen Found at Trial Entry is Reduced to Fewer Than 10^3 Cfu/mL and no New Pathogen >10^3 Cfu/mL,711
SecondaryAdditional Health Care Visits With the Chief Complaint of Urinary Tract Infection
Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Additional Health Care Visits With the Chief Complaint of Urinary Tract Infection
ParticipantsFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
Additional Health Care Visits With the Chief Complaint of Urinary Tract Infection10

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fixed Duration Treatment0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)7/19 (36.8%)
Patient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)7/20 (35%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/190/20
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/193/20
Yeast InfectionInfections and infestations2/191/20
Burning/Itching/Pain in vaginal areaReproductive system and breast disorders2/192/20
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/192/20
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/190/20
FatigueNervous system disorders1/190/20
HivesImmune system disorders0/191/20
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/191/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Fixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)Total
Median35 (18 to 58)31 (18 to 58)32 (25 to 45)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)Total
Female192039
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Fixed Duration TreatmentPatient-directed Antimicrobial Duration (PDAD)Total
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Olive View - UCLA Medical Center
    Sylmar, California 91342, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Dec;7(12):653-60. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.190. PubMed 21139641 ↗
  • Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Dec 8. PubMed 24484571 ↗
  • Taylor RA, Moore CL, Cheung KH, Brandt C. Predicting urinary tract infections in the emergency department with machine learning. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0194085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194085. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29513742 ↗
  • Hicks LA, Bartoces MG, Roberts RM, Suda KJ, Hunkler RJ, Taylor TH Jr, Schrag SJ. US outpatient antibiotic prescribing variation according to geography, patient population, and provider specialty in 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1308-16. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ076. Epub 2015 Mar 5. PubMed 25747410 ↗
  • May L, Cosgrove S, L'Archeveque M, Talan DA, Payne P, Jordan J, Rothman RE. A call to action for antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department: approaches and strategies. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):69-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Nov 2. PubMed 23122955 ↗
  • Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 May;13(5):269-84. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3432. Epub 2015 Apr 8. PubMed 25853778 ↗
  • Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, Moran GJ, Nicolle LE, Raz R, Schaeffer AJ, Soper DE; Infectious Diseases Society of America; European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 1;52(5):e103-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq257. PubMed 21292654 ↗
  • Talan DA, Takhar SS, Krishnadasan A, Abrahamian FM, Mower WR, Moran GJ; EMERGEncy ID Net Study Group. Fluoroquinolone-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Infections in Patients with Pyelonephritis, United States(1). Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;22(9):1594-603. doi: 10.3201/eid2209.160148. PubMed 27532362 ↗
  • Talan DA, Takhar SS, Krishnadasan A, Mower WR, Pallin DJ, Garg M, Femling J, Rothman RE, Moore JC, Jones AE, Lovecchio F, Jui J, Steele MT, Stubbs AM, Chiang WK, Moran GJ. Emergence of Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase Urinary Tract Infections Among Hospitalized Emergency Department Patients in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;77(1):32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Oct 31. PubMed 33131912 ↗
  • Low M, Neuberger A, Hooton TM, Green MS, Raz R, Balicer RD, Almog R. Association between urinary community-acquired fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli and neighbourhood antibiotic consumption: a population-based case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):419-428. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30676-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4. PubMed 30846277 ↗
  • Brown KA, Khanafer N, Daneman N, Fisman DN. Meta-analysis of antibiotics and the risk of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2326-32. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02176-12. Epub 2013 Mar 11. PubMed 23478961 ↗
  • McCusker ME, Harris AD, Perencevich E, Roghmann MC. Fluoroquinolone use and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Jun;9(6):730-3. doi: 10.3201/eid0906.020385. PubMed 12781017 ↗
  • Sader HS, Biedenbach DJ, Streit JM, Jones RN. Cefdinir activity against contemporary North American isolates from community-acquired urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Jan;25(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.07.006. PubMed 15620832 ↗
  • Mogle BT, Beccari MV, Steele JM, Fazili T, Kufel WD. Clinical considerations for oral beta-lactams as step-down therapy for Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;20(8):903-907. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1594774. Epub 2019 Mar 25. No abstract available. PubMed 30908107 ↗
  • Fung-Tomc JC, Huczko E, Stickle T, Minassian B, Kolek B, Denbleyker K, Bonner D, Kessler R. Antibacterial activities of cefprozil compared with those of 13 oral cephems and 3 macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):533-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.2.533. PubMed 7726528 ↗
  • Bonsu BK, Shuler L, Sawicki L, Dorst P, Cohen DM. Susceptibility of recent bacterial isolates to cefdinir and selected antibiotics among children with urinary tract infections. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):76-81. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.032. Epub 2005 Dec 19. PubMed 16365328 ↗
  • MacGregor RR, Graziani AL. Oral administration of antibiotics: a rational alternative to the parenteral route. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):457-67. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.457. PubMed 9114201 ↗
  • Guay DR. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cefdinir, an oral extended spectrum cephalosporin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Dec;19(12 Suppl):S141-6. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200012001-00002. PubMed 11144395 ↗
  • Kanan M, Atif S, Mohammed F, Balahmar Y, Adawi Y, AlSaleem R, Farhan A, Alghoribi M, Mohammed S, Alshanbari R, Fahad M, Kallab R, Mohammed R, Alassaf D, Hazza A. A Systematic Review on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Cephalexin in Healthy and Diseased Populations. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 3;12(9):1402. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12091402. PubMed 37760698 ↗
  • Leigh AP, Nemeth MA, Keyserling CH, Hotary LH, Tack KJ. Cefdinir versus cefaclor in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Clin Ther. 2000 Jul;22(7):818-25. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)80054-5. PubMed 10945508 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 13, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06127160
Lead sponsor
Brett A Faine
Collaborators
University of California, Los Angeles
Responsible party
Brett A Faine (Clinical Associate Professor, University of Iowa) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2023
Start date
Jun 4, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2025
Completion
Aug 29, 2025
Results posted
Aug 3, 2026
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion