CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06089213TelehealthUpdated Oct 18, 2023

Strategies for Preventing Falls in the Elderly

An interventional study of real-time intervention in Fall, Elderly and Prevention, sponsored by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-18.

Sponsored by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Sep 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fall incidents are the third cause of chronic disability in the elderly, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Recent reviews demonstrate that multifactorial and multicomponent intervention programs are effective in preventing falls in community-dwelling older adults. However, the application of these programs may not be accessible to a large part of the elderly population. The lack of continuity in the treatment of the consequences of falls, as well as the dissemination of prevention measures for this patient profile, could be minimized through the use of information and communication technologies. Method: This will be a randomized clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effects of two fall prevention strategies via telerehabilitation for elderly fallers after admission to an emergency room. It will be carried out by a multidisciplinary team with interventions for eight weeks and monitoring of outcomes over a period of four months. Patients will be evaluated regarding aspects of functionality in the second and month after the interventions and regarding the recurrence of falls during the four-month period. Discussion: The hypothesis is that the programs are viable in terms of accessibility to home training. However, to date, there is no evidence about the differences between these forms of interventions to prevent falls via telecare.

Read the detailed description

To compare the effects of two different strategies for preventing falls through telerehabilitation for elderly fallers after admission to an emergency room.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fall
  • Elderly
  • Prevention
  • Telehealth
  • Physical Therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • elderly fallers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological diseases
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interactive services

    Otago exercises performed in "real-time" or "synchronous" mode of digital health care. It consists of direct communication between physiotherapist and the patient.

    Other: real-time intervention

  • Active comparator
    Remote telemonitoring

    Otago exercises performed remotely, using technologies such as messaging apps. It consists of indirect communication between physiotherapist and the patient.

    Other: real-time intervention

Interventions

  • Otherreal-time intervention

    An individual exercise program will be carried out at home, supervised remotely via videoconference.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Falls

    After the intervention periods, participants will be followed for another 16 weeks. Every week, recurrences of falls will be recorded via telephone calls. You will be asked whether there were falls in the period

    Time frame: four months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concern of falls

    The assessment will consist of Self-efficacy tests for Falls

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Balance

    The assessment will consist of Timed-Up and Go test

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Arms Muscle strength

    Palm Grip Strength

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Legs Muscle strength

    Sitting and Rising from a Chair tests

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Functionality

    Katz Index on elderly functionality evaluation for the analysis of basic activities

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital de Pronto Socorro
    Porto Alegre, RS 90880-370, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06089213
Lead sponsor
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Responsible party
Éder Kröeff Cardoso (Principal Investigator, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 18, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2023
Completion
Sep 2, 2023
Last update
Oct 18, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion