CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06072261Updated Oct 10, 2023

The Effect of Handgrip Strength on Functional Level

An interventional study of kinesio tape application in Rehabilitation, sponsored by Suleyman Demirel University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-10.

Sponsored by Suleyman Demirel University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2023, registered Oct 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, it was aimed to examine the effects of kinesio tape applied to the forearm extensor muscles on the functional level of patients undergoing lower extremity surgery with walker ambulation.

Patients who were evaluated before being included in the post-surgical rehabilitation program (before kinesio tape application) and before discharge will be included in the study group. For the control group data, patients who underwent lower extremity surgery at the same institution for similar periods, but were included in the standard rehabilitation program, but did not apply kinesio tape, will be included. Standard rehabilitation practice includes in-bed transfer training, gait training, practice of daily living activities, and therapeutic exercise practices .

Before the standard rehabilitation program, kinesio taping was applied to both upper extremities in the form of a "Y" tape from the medial epicondyle to the wrist flexors, with 15-20% tension, to the patients hospitalized in the orthopedic service after lower extremity surgery. The tape should remain on the patient's arm throughout the hospital stay

Read the detailed description

In the literature, as predictors of poor functional recovery after lower extremity fracture and prosthetic surgery; old age, low functional level before fracture, cognitive impairment, comorbidities, living alone, and long hospital stay have been shown. Although the lower extremity has a higher relationship than the upper extremity in activities such as walking and physical function, the grip strength, which is closely related to the lower extremity strength, is an easily measurable, reliable, and applicable method for assessing whole body strength.In addition, handgrip strength is used as an important criterion in determining the functional level of elderly individuals. Although there are many studies in the literature that grip strength is a determinant of functional level, no study has been encountered showing the effects of kinesio taping application on the functional level of improving grip strength in elderly individuals who have undergone lower extremity surgery and provided with walker assisted ambulation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Functional Level
  • Handgrip Strenght
  • Kinesio Tape
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Suleyman Demirel University is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 65 years of age of both sexes, patients who were followed up postoperatively in the Department of Orthopedics of Süleyman Demirel University, patients whose mobilization was provided with a walker, and patients whose general condition was oriented and cooperative, were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrollable lung or cardiac problems, patients with psychiatric disease (dementia...) that may affect the answers given, patients who used any drugs and alcohol that could affect cognitive functions were excluded from the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kinesio Tape Group

    Before the standard rehabilitation program, kinesio taping was applied to both upper extremities in the form of a "Y" tape from the medial epicondyle to the wrist flexors, with 15-20% tension, to the patients hospitalized in the orthopedic service after lower extremity surgery. The tape should remain on the patient's arm throughout the hospital stay

    Other: kinesio tape application

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    For the control group data, patients who underwent lower extremity surgery at the same institution for similar periods, but were included in the standard rehabilitation program, but did not apply kinesio tape, will be included. Standard rehabilitation practice includes in-bed transfer training, gait training, practice of daily living activities, and therapeutic exercise practices

Interventions

  • Otherkinesio tape application

    Before the standard rehabilitation program, kinesio taping was applied to both upper extremities in the form of a "Y" tape from the medial epicondyle to the wrist flexors, with 15-20% tension, to the patients hospitalized in the orthopedic service after lower extremity surgery. The tape should remain on the patient's arm throughout the hospital stay

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Handgrip strenght

    It was evaluated using a Jamar handheld dynamometer. During the evaluation, the patient was asked to stand in a static position. Maximum grip strength measurements were performed with the elbow flexed at 90° in the patient sitting position. Measurements were repeated 3 times at 30 second intervals in both extremities, and the results were recorded in kilogram-force form. In the measurement of maximum handgrip strength, the participants were asked to continue squeezing even if there was pain, and the maximum grip strength they reach was recorded

    Time frame: 3-5 days (Change from Baseline Handgrip strenght at discharged)

  2. Pain assessment

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment. The pain of the patient, who determines a point on the vertically drawn line with a length of 10 cm, is determined over one hundred points. A score of 100 means unbearable pain, and a score of 0 means no pain at all. This evaluation provides information about the pain profile of patients during activity and at rest

    Time frame: 3-5 days (Change from Baseline Handgrip strenght at discharged)

  3. Functional Independence Measurement-FIM

    The FIM instrument FIM indicates the degree of independence of the individual in basic physical and cognitive activities in daily life. The FIM includes 18 items that measure functional independence in 6 subscales: self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is rated on a seven-point scale that represents different gradations of independence and reflects the amount of assistance the patient requires to perform a specific activity. Independence is categorized and scored as complete independence, 7; modified independence, 6; requires supervision or setup, 5; requires minimal contact assistance, 4; requires moderate assistance, 3; requires maximal assistance, 2; and requires total assistance, 1. The sum of all 18 items comprises the patient's total FIM score, which ranges from 18 to 126

    Time frame: 3-5 days (Change from Baseline Handgrip strenght at discharged)

  4. Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILAS) and Walking Speed Scale (IWSS)

    ILAS and IWSS are a measurement method that evaluates various physical functions and whose validity and reliability have been demonstrated in patients with knee replacement. With the ILAS, the performance level of 4 different physical activities (from lying on the back to sitting, getting up from sitting, walking 4.57 meters (15 feet), going up and down three flights of stairs) is evaluated. The scoring of these physical activities is based on the level of assistance that patients need during the activities ("0" could not be tested, "1" unsuccessful, "2" maximum assistance, "3" medium assistance, "4" minimum assistance, "5" observational assistance, "5" observational assistance. 6" independent) are made. With IWSS, walking speed is evaluated at a distance of 13.4 meters (44 feet). This scale ranges from 0 to 6 ("0" ≤20 sec, "1" 21-30 sec, "2" 31-40 sec, "3" 41-50 sec, "4" 51-60 sec, "5" 61 -70 sec, "6" \>70 sec) or the time to complete walking is recorded as a score.

    Time frame: 3-5 days (Change from Baseline Handgrip strenght at discharged)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Menekşe ŞAFAK
    Merkez, Isparta 32000, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06072261
Lead sponsor
Suleyman Demirel University
Responsible party
Menekse Safak (Research Assistant, Suleyman Demirel University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
Start date
Apr 15, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2023
Completion
Sep 15, 2023
Last update
Oct 10, 2023

Study contacts

Zeliha BAŞKURT, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Ferdi BAŞKURT, Prof. Dr.
study chair · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Tuba İNCE PARPUCU, Assist. Prof.
study chair · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion