CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06067425upreACH-2Updated Jun 25, 2026Results posted

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of SAR442501 in Pediatric Participants With Achondroplasia

A Phase 2 interventional study of SAR442501 in Osteochondrodysplasia, sponsored by Sanofi. Terminated at 9 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 0 Days to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision. Not related to safety concern.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Days to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2, open-label, multicenter, study to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of SAR442501 in children from birth up to 12 years of age with Achondroplasia.

Read the detailed description

Up to approximately 275 weeks: 3 weeks Screening + 52 weeks primary treatment period + up to approximately 216 weeks extended treatment period+ 4 weeks follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteochondrodysplasia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteochondrodysplasias

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteochondrodysplasias; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 77 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Osteochondrodysplasias.

Browse Osteochondrodysplasias studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Days to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have ACH with a confirmed mutation in the FGFR3 gene
  • Participants and/or parent(s) or legal representative(s) must be willing and able to perform all the study procedures to the best of their physical ability.
  • Parent(s) or legal representative(s) capable of giving signed informed consent and participants capable of giving assent when applicable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have hypochondroplasia (or the N540K mutation) or short stature condition other than ACH (eg, trisomy 21, pseudochondroplasia)
  • Participants have received any dose of medications or investigational product, including human growth hormone, IGF-1, intended to affect participants' stature or body proportions between the completion of OBS16647 and enrollment (Week 0/Day 1/Visit 2).
  • Have a history of growth plate closure.
  • Long bone fracture within 3 months of enrollment (Week 0/Day 1/Visit 2)
  • Current evidence of corneal or retinal disorder/keratopathy.
  • Participants have had a previous surgical intervention involving the foramen magnum (Stage 2 only).
  • Hyperphosphatemia.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1

    Drug: SAR442501

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2

    Drug: SAR442501

  • Experimental
    Cohort 3

    Drug: SAR442501

Interventions

  • DrugSAR442501

    Solution for injection; Subcutaneous injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to study drug or not) that at any dose: resulted in death; or was life-threatening; or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; or resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. The TEAEs were defined as events that were newly reported or reported to worsen in severity after the start of study drug up to 5 days post last dose of the study drug.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Growth Velocity Z-Score

    Post-treatment annualized growth velocity (AGV) was calculated from height measurements collected during the study. AGV was calculated as: AGV (centimeter per year)= (Height at Date 2 - Height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25, where interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1+1). Z scores were calculated using LMS methods (Box Cox power L, Median M and Variation S), where appropriate: If L≠ 0: Z= \[(AGV/M)\^L-1\]/(LxS); If L= 0: Z= ln(AGV/M)/S. A Z score of 0 represents the mean AGV of the reference achondroplasia (ACH) population. For AGV Z scores in children with ACH: Higher Z scores represent better outcomes, meaning faster linear growth relative to age and sex matched reference populations. Lower Z scores represent worse outcomes, indicating slower growth compared to reference norms. Baseline value was defined as last available pre dose height measurement meeting statistical analysis plan specified time interval definitions.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  2. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Annualized Growth Velocity

    The AGV was defined as follows: (Height at Date 2 - height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25, where the interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1 +1) days. The post-treatment AGV was calculated from height measurements collected during the study. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  3. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Height Z-Score

    Post-treatment AGV was calculated from height measurements collected during the study. AGV was calculated as: AGV (centimeter per year)= (Height at Date 2 - Height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25, where interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1+1). Z scores were calculated using LMS methods (Box Cox power L, Median M and Variation S), where appropriate: If L≠ 0: Z= \[(AGV/M)\^L-1\]/(LxS); If L= 0: Z= ln(AGV/M)/S. A Z score of 0 represents the mean AGV of the reference population (ACH). For AGV Z scores in children with ACH: Higher Z scores represent better outcomes, meaning faster linear growth relative to age and sex matched reference populations. Lower Z scores represent worse outcomes, indicating slower growth compared to reference norms. Baseline value was defined as last available pre dose height measurement meeting statistical analysis plan specified time interval definitions.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  4. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio

    The upper to lower body segment ratio was calculated by (standing height or total length - lower body segment length) divided by lower body segment length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  5. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Extremity Ratio

    The upper to lower extremity ratio was calculated by (upper arm + forearm length) divided by (upper leg + lower leg length). The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  6. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Sitting to Standing Height Ratio

    The sitting to standing height ratio was calculated by sitting height divided by standing height, or crown to rump length divided by total length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  7. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Arm Span to Height Ratio

    The arm span to height ratio was calculated by arm span divided by standing height, or arm span divided by total length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  8. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Arm to Forearm Length Ratio

    The upper arm to forearm length ratio was calculated by upper arm length divided by forearm length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  9. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Leg to Lower Leg Ratio

    The upper leg to lower leg length ratio was calculated by upper leg length divided by lower leg length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  10. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Head Circumference to Height Ratio

    The head circumference to height ratio was calculated by head circumference divided by standing height, or head circumference divided by total length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  11. Stage 2: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Brainstem, Skull, and Spine Morphometric and Volumetric Parameters

    The magnetic resonance imaging was planned to be collected to measure foramen magnum and other brainstem, skull, and spine morphometric parameters in Stage 2 participants. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  12. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Social Score, Emotional Score, and School Functioning Score

    The pediatric quality of life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales assesses pediatric health related quality of life (HRQOL) across functioning domains. Items use a 5-point scale (0=Never to 4=Almost Always). Responses are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0→100, 1→75, 2→50, 3→25, 4→0), where higher scores indicate better quality of life (fewer problems). Domain scores for Social, Emotional, and School Functioning are calculated from the transformed item scores. If more than 50% of items in a domain are missing, the domain score is not computed. If at least 50% are completed, the domain score equals the mean of the non missing transformed item scores. All domain scores range from 0 (almost always) to 100 (never), with higher scores indicate better HRQOL. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  13. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Psychosocial Health Summary Score, Physical Health Summary Score, and Total Score

    The PedsQL core scale was a brief, standardized, generic instrument that was used to measure HRQOL in various pediatric conditions. Psychosocial health summary scores were the meaning of item scores in emotional, social, and school functioning scales; and Physical health summary scores were the meaning of item scores in physical scale. Total score was the mean of all the item scores in all scales. Psychosocial and physical health summary scores and total scores each ranged from 0 (almost always) to 100 (never). Higher scores indicate better HRQOL. For participants aged 5 to 7, only parents completed the questionnaire. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  14. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Mobility Score

    The screening tool for everyday mobility and symptoms (STEMS) was completed by clinicians for participants 5 years of age and older. The STEMS captures mobility, use of mobility aides, and impact of pain and/or fatigue at the end of the day across 3 environments: home, school/work and community. Mobility aides were recorded using numeric 5-point rating scale, score ranged from 1 to 5, where 1= independent on all surfaces including stairs, 2= use of sticks, 3= use of crutches, 4= use of wheeled walking device, and 5= use of wheelchair or mobility scooter. Lower score indicated the better outcome. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  15. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Participants Reported Symptoms

    The STEMS was completed by clinicians for participants 5 years of age and older. The STEMS captures mobility, use of mobility aides, and impact of pain and/or fatigue at the end of the day across 3 environments: home, school/work and community. Participant reported symptoms were recorded using letters where A= no pain or fatigue, B1= pain only, B2= fatigue and C= pain and fatigue. This was completed for each of the 3 environments resulting in 3 scores, whereby the numeric rating reflects the use of mobility aides and the letter reflects the symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. Only participants with a Baseline response of "A" were included in the "A to A," "A to B1," and "A to missing" categories at each time point. Similarly, only participants with a Baseline response of "B1" were included in the "B1 to A" and "B1 to missing" categories at each time point.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  16. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue Scores and Total Score

    The PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale measures fatigue across 3 subscales:General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue. Items are rated on a 5 point scale (0=Never to 4=Almost Always). Responses are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0→100, 1→75, 2→50, 3→25, 4→0), with higher scores indicate less fatigue and better functioning. Subscale scores are calculated as mean of transformed item scores within each subscale. A Total Score was calculated as mean of all transformed items across subscales. If more than 50% of items are missing within a subscale or across total scale, corresponding score is not computed. If at least 50% are completed, scores are calculated as mean of non missing transformed items. All scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain), with higher scores indicate less fatigue. Baseline was defined as last available value prior to first dose of study drug. For participants aged 5-7 years, only parent proxy report was completed.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  17. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Current Pain and Worst Pain Rating (PPQ) Score

    The PedsQL PPQ assesses current pain and worst pain intensity in the last week using a visual analog scale as well as pain location using a body map. Current and worst pain were scored separately, and scoring was based on the line length to the nearest 0.5 centimeter (5 millimeter). The score ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain), where higher scores indicated greater levels of pain intensity. The PedsQL PPQ was only administered in participants ages 5 years of age and older using both self-report (ages 8 and older) and parent proxy report (ages 5 and older) forms in all countries. For participants aged 5 to 7, only parents completed the questionnaire. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  18. Stage 2: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Achievement of Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Communication, and Feeding Milestones

    For Stage 2 participants, achievement of developmental milestones was planned to be assessed using the ACH developmental recording form. This form allows developmental milestones to be recorded and was not a formalized screening tool or assessment. The form measures the domains of gross motor function, fine motor function, communication and feeding via participant reports to the Investigator. The form depicts the cumulative percentage distributions for children with ACH for each item as well as norms for reference based on the Denver II test, where available. Data collected via this form was planned to be evaluated descriptively to explore the age at which participants in this study achieve developmental milestones. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

  19. Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of SAR442501

    Blood samples are collected to determine plasma concentration of SAR442501.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 6, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57

  20. Stage 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SAR442501

    Blood samples are collected to determine Cmax of SAR442501. The Cmax of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57

  21. Stage 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of SAR442501

    Blood samples are collected to determine tmax of SAR442501. The tmax of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57

  22. Stage 1: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-tau) of SAR442501

    Blood samples are collected to determine AUC0-tau of SAR442501. The AUC0-tau of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57

  23. Stage 1: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SAR442501

    Blood samples are collected to determine Ctrough of SAR442501. The Ctrough of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Days 8, 29, 57, 92, 183, 274, 365 and 449

  24. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Collagen X Biomarker (CXM) Level

    Serum samples were collected to assess the change in CXM level with study drug. The CXM was also named PRO-C10 because the biomarker assay used was aimed to target the recognition of the C terminus of the NC1 domain of type X collagen. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline in CXM level has been reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 26

  25. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Osteocalcin Level

    Serum samples were collected to assess the change in osteocalcin level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  26. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Level

    Serum samples were collected to assess the change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  27. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) Level

    Serum samples were collected to assess the change in P1NP level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  28. Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Collagen-Type 1 C-Telopeptide (CTX) Level

    Serum samples were collected to assess the change in CTX level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

  29. Stage 1: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to SAR442501

    Serum samples were collected to assess the antibodies to SAR442501. Samples were screened and then confirmed for antibodies binding to SAR442501 and the titer of confirmed positive samples were reported. Positive ADA refers to pre-existing ADA at the pre-dose assessment on Day 1.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)

  30. Stage 2: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Neurological Examination Findings

    A complete neurological examination included assessment of mental status, motor function and balance, sensory exam, newborn and infant reflexes, muscle stretch reflexes in the older children and evaluation of the cranial nerves. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

07

Results

Posted Jun 25, 2026
Limitations and caveats
The study was early terminated per Sponsor decision, for reasons not related to safety concerns.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 6 centers in 4 countries from 10 October 2023 to 12 February 2025. A total of 16 participants who had completed data collection in the study OBS16647 and met the eligibility were enrolled in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Started106
Completed00
Not completed106
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor decision, which was not related to safety concerns86

Outcome measures

PrimaryStage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to study drug or not) that at any dose: resulted in death; or was life-threatening; or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; or resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. The TEAEs were defined as events that were newly reported or reported to worsen in severity after the start of study drug up to 5 days post last dose of the study drug.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
ParticipantsStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Any TEAE54
Any serious TEAE10
Any AESI00
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Growth Velocity Z-Score

Post-treatment annualized growth velocity (AGV) was calculated from height measurements collected during the study. AGV was calculated as: AGV (centimeter per year)= (Height at Date 2 - Height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25, where interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1+1). Z scores were calculated using LMS methods (Box Cox power L, Median M and Variation S), where appropriate: If L≠ 0: Z= \[(AGV/M)\^L-1\]/(LxS); If L= 0: Z= ln(AGV/M)/S. A Z score of 0 represents the mean AGV of the reference achondroplasia (ACH) population. For AGV Z scores in children with ACH: Higher Z scores represent better outcomes, meaning faster linear growth relative to age and sex matched reference populations. Lower Z scores represent worse outcomes, indicating slower growth compared to reference norms. Baseline value was defined as last available pre dose height measurement meeting statistical analysis plan specified time interval definitions.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · Z-score
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Growth Velocity Z-Score
Z-scoreStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 262.89 ± 3.754.58 ± 4.96
Week 521.45 ± 2.561.92 ± 2.83
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Annualized Growth Velocity

The AGV was defined as follows: (Height at Date 2 - height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25, where the interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1 +1) days. The post-treatment AGV was calculated from height measurements collected during the study. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · centimeter per year
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Annualized Growth Velocity
centimeter per yearStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 261.34 ± 1.832.63 ± 2.36
Week 520.53 ± 1.211.29 ± 1.49
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Height Z-Score

Post-treatment AGV was calculated from height measurements collected during the study. AGV was calculated as: AGV (centimeter per year)= (Height at Date 2 - Height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25, where interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1+1). Z scores were calculated using LMS methods (Box Cox power L, Median M and Variation S), where appropriate: If L≠ 0: Z= \[(AGV/M)\^L-1\]/(LxS); If L= 0: Z= ln(AGV/M)/S. A Z score of 0 represents the mean AGV of the reference population (ACH). For AGV Z scores in children with ACH: Higher Z scores represent better outcomes, meaning faster linear growth relative to age and sex matched reference populations. Lower Z scores represent worse outcomes, indicating slower growth compared to reference norms. Baseline value was defined as last available pre dose height measurement meeting statistical analysis plan specified time interval definitions.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · Z-score
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Height Z-Score
Z-scoreStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 260.07 ± 0.060.13 ± 0.15
Week 520.01 ± 0.130.02 ± 0.30
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio

The upper to lower body segment ratio was calculated by (standing height or total length - lower body segment length) divided by lower body segment length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-0.037 ± 0.060-0.047 ± 0.038
Week 52-0.060 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Extremity Ratio

The upper to lower extremity ratio was calculated by (upper arm + forearm length) divided by (upper leg + lower leg length). The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Extremity Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-0.024 ± 0.025-0.023 ± 0.019
Week 52-0.030 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Sitting to Standing Height Ratio

The sitting to standing height ratio was calculated by sitting height divided by standing height, or crown to rump length divided by total length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Sitting to Standing Height Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-0.006 ± 0.0130.003 ± 0.010
Week 520.000 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Arm Span to Height Ratio

The arm span to height ratio was calculated by arm span divided by standing height, or arm span divided by total length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Arm Span to Height Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-0.009 ± 0.013-0.005 ± 0.014
Week 520.020 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Arm to Forearm Length Ratio

The upper arm to forearm length ratio was calculated by upper arm length divided by forearm length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Arm to Forearm Length Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 260.016 ± 0.062-0.002 ± 0.071
Week 520.070 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Leg to Lower Leg Ratio

The upper leg to lower leg length ratio was calculated by upper leg length divided by lower leg length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Leg to Lower Leg Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-0.011 ± 0.032-0.003 ± 0.053
Week 52-0.030 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Head Circumference to Height Ratio

The head circumference to height ratio was calculated by head circumference divided by standing height, or head circumference divided by total length. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Head Circumference to Height Ratio
ratioStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-0.016 ± 0.005-0.013 ± 0.010
Week 52-0.030 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 2: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Brainstem, Skull, and Spine Morphometric and Volumetric Parameters

The magnetic resonance imaging was planned to be collected to measure foramen magnum and other brainstem, skull, and spine morphometric parameters in Stage 2 participants. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Social Score, Emotional Score, and School Functioning Score

The pediatric quality of life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales assesses pediatric health related quality of life (HRQOL) across functioning domains. Items use a 5-point scale (0=Never to 4=Almost Always). Responses are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0→100, 1→75, 2→50, 3→25, 4→0), where higher scores indicate better quality of life (fewer problems). Domain scores for Social, Emotional, and School Functioning are calculated from the transformed item scores. If more than 50% of items in a domain are missing, the domain score is not computed. If at least 50% are completed, the domain score equals the mean of the non missing transformed item scores. All domain scores range from 0 (almost always) to 100 (never), with higher scores indicate better HRQOL. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Social Score, Emotional Score, and School Functioning Score
score on a scaleStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Social functioning score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-10.00 ± 7.07-2.50 ± 21.02
Social functioning score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)7.50 ± 10.615.00 ± 18.71
Social functioning score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)0.00 ± 6.122.50 ± 3.54
Social functioning score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)20.00 ± NA—
Emotional functioning score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-10.00 ± 28.2811.25 ± 16.52
Emotional functioning score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)-2.50 ± 31.821.25 ± 6.29
Emotional functioning score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)9.00 ± 6.520.00 ± 0.00
Emotional functioning score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)5.00 ± NA—
School functioning score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)20.00 ± 7.07-8.75 ± 12.50
School functioning score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)7.50 ± 17.6820.00 ± 23.80
School functioning score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)5.00 ± 10.005.00 ± 0.00
School functioning score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)10.00 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Psychosocial Health Summary Score, Physical Health Summary Score, and Total Score

The PedsQL core scale was a brief, standardized, generic instrument that was used to measure HRQOL in various pediatric conditions. Psychosocial health summary scores were the meaning of item scores in emotional, social, and school functioning scales; and Physical health summary scores were the meaning of item scores in physical scale. Total score was the mean of all the item scores in all scales. Psychosocial and physical health summary scores and total scores each ranged from 0 (almost always) to 100 (never). Higher scores indicate better HRQOL. For participants aged 5 to 7, only parents completed the questionnaire. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Psychosocial Health Summary Score, Physical Health Summary Score, and Total Score
score on a scaleStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Psychosocial health summary score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)0.00 ± 9.430.00 ± 14.60
Psychosocial health summary score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)4.17 ± 20.038.75 ± 15.89
Psychosocial health summary score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)4.67 ± 4.152.50 ± 1.17
Psychosocial health summary score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)11.66 ± NA—
Physical health summary score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-17.19 ± 41.999.37 ± 12.76
Physical health summary score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)26.56 ± 6.630.78 ± 19.99
Physical health summary score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-1.87 ± 10.27-1.56 ± 11.05
Physical health summary score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)25.00 ± NA—
Total score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-5.98 ± 20.753.26 ± 13.95
Total score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)11.96 ± 10.765.98 ± 16.09
Total score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)2.39 ± 3.301.09 ± 3.08
Total score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)16.30 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Mobility Score

The screening tool for everyday mobility and symptoms (STEMS) was completed by clinicians for participants 5 years of age and older. The STEMS captures mobility, use of mobility aides, and impact of pain and/or fatigue at the end of the day across 3 environments: home, school/work and community. Mobility aides were recorded using numeric 5-point rating scale, score ranged from 1 to 5, where 1= independent on all surfaces including stairs, 2= use of sticks, 3= use of crutches, 4= use of wheeled walking device, and 5= use of wheelchair or mobility scooter. Lower score indicated the better outcome. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Mobility Score
score on a scaleStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Mobility - community: Week 260.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
Mobility - community: Week 520.00 ± NA—
Mobility - home: Week 260.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
Mobility - home: Week 520.00 ± NA—
Mobility - school: Week 260.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
Mobility - school: Week 520.00 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Participants Reported Symptoms

The STEMS was completed by clinicians for participants 5 years of age and older. The STEMS captures mobility, use of mobility aides, and impact of pain and/or fatigue at the end of the day across 3 environments: home, school/work and community. Participant reported symptoms were recorded using letters where A= no pain or fatigue, B1= pain only, B2= fatigue and C= pain and fatigue. This was completed for each of the 3 environments resulting in 3 scores, whereby the numeric rating reflects the use of mobility aides and the letter reflects the symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. Only participants with a Baseline response of "A" were included in the "A to A," "A to B1," and "A to missing" categories at each time point. Similarly, only participants with a Baseline response of "B1" were included in the "B1 to A" and "B1 to missing" categories at each time point.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Participants Reported Symptoms
participantsStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 26 - A to A56
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 26 - A to B110
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 26 - A to missing10
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 26 - B1 to A1—
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 52 - A to B110
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 52 - A to missing66
Self reported symptoms - community: Week 52 - B1 to missing1—
Self reported symptoms - home: Week 26 - A to A66
Self reported symptoms - home: Week 26 - A to missing10
Self reported symptoms - home: Week 26 - B1 to A1—
Self reported symptoms - home: Week 52 - A to A10
Self reported symptoms - home: Week 52 - A to missing66
Self reported symptoms - home: Week 52 - B1 to missing1—
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 26 - A to A56
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 26 - A to B110
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 26 - A to missing10
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 26 - B1 to A1—
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 52 - A to B110
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 52 - A to missing66
Self reported symptoms - school/work: Week 52 - B1 to missing1—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue Scores and Total Score

The PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale measures fatigue across 3 subscales:General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue. Items are rated on a 5 point scale (0=Never to 4=Almost Always). Responses are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0→100, 1→75, 2→50, 3→25, 4→0), with higher scores indicate less fatigue and better functioning. Subscale scores are calculated as mean of transformed item scores within each subscale. A Total Score was calculated as mean of all transformed items across subscales. If more than 50% of items are missing within a subscale or across total scale, corresponding score is not computed. If at least 50% are completed, scores are calculated as mean of non missing transformed items. All scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain), with higher scores indicate less fatigue. Baseline was defined as last available value prior to first dose of study drug. For participants aged 5-7 years, only parent proxy report was completed.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue Scores and Total Score
score on a scaleStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
General fatigue score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)0.00 ± NA2.08 ± 11.02
General fatigue score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)-6.25 ± 2.941.04 ± 2.08
General fatigue score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)4.17 ± 7.7922.92 ± 14.73
General fatigue score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)8.33 ± NA—
Sleep/Rest fatigue score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-20.84 ± NA-6.25 ± 4.17
Sleep/Rest fatigue score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)6.25 ± 8.84-2.09 ± 2.41
Sleep/Rest fatigue score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)5.83 ± 3.73-8.34 ± 11.79
Sleep/Rest fatigue score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)4.17 ± NA—
Cognitive fatigue score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-8.33 ± NA-3.12 ± 9.24
Cognitive fatigue score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)14.58 ± 2.94-10.42 ± 12.50
Cognitive fatigue score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-8.33 ± 17.922.09 ± 2.95
Cognitive fatigue score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-12.50 ± NA—
Total score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)-9.72 ± NA-2.43 ± 7.56
Total score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)4.86 ± 4.91-3.82 ± 4.87
Total score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)0.55 ± 6.495.56 ± 1.96
Total score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)0.00 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Current Pain and Worst Pain Rating (PPQ) Score

The PedsQL PPQ assesses current pain and worst pain intensity in the last week using a visual analog scale as well as pain location using a body map. Current and worst pain were scored separately, and scoring was based on the line length to the nearest 0.5 centimeter (5 millimeter). The score ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain), where higher scores indicated greater levels of pain intensity. The PedsQL PPQ was only administered in participants ages 5 years of age and older using both self-report (ages 8 and older) and parent proxy report (ages 5 and older) forms in all countries. For participants aged 5 to 7, only parents completed the questionnaire. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Current Pain and Worst Pain Rating (PPQ) Score
score on a scaleStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Current pain intensity score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)1.00 ± 1.410.00 ± 0.00
Current pain intensity score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)-0.50 ± 0.710.00 ± 0.00
Current pain intensity score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-10.00 ± 22.360.00 ± 0.00
Current pain intensity score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-50.00 ± NA—
Worst pain intensity score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (child report)10.00 ± 14.140.00 ± 0.00
Worst pain intensity score: Week 26: 8 to 12 years of age (parent report)-0.50 ± 0.710.00 ± 0.00
Worst pain intensity score: Week 26: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-15.60 ± 34.880.00 ± 0.00
Worst pain intensity score: Week 52: 5 to 7 years of age (parent report)-80.00 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 2: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Achievement of Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Communication, and Feeding Milestones

For Stage 2 participants, achievement of developmental milestones was planned to be assessed using the ACH developmental recording form. This form allows developmental milestones to be recorded and was not a formalized screening tool or assessment. The form measures the domains of gross motor function, fine motor function, communication and feeding via participant reports to the Investigator. The form depicts the cumulative percentage distributions for children with ACH for each item as well as norms for reference based on the Denver II test, where available. Data collected via this form was planned to be evaluated descriptively to explore the age at which participants in this study achieve developmental milestones. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryStage 1: Plasma Concentration of SAR442501

Blood samples are collected to determine plasma concentration of SAR442501.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 6, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
Reported as:
Mean · nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of SAR442501
nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Pre-dose on Day 1NA ± NANA ± NA
6 hours post dose on Day 16190 ± 32208660 ± 1350
24 hours post dose on Day 13280 ± 7576260 ± 1680
72 hours post dose on Day 1220 ± 188728 ± 367
Pre-dose on Day 57215 ± 235495 ± 410
3 hours post dose on Day 575000 ± 33508460 ± 3520
6 hours post dose on Day 575840 ± 29108240 ± 1770
12 hours post dose on Day 574840 ± 23608770 ± 3100
24 hours post dose on Day 572930 ± 11607050 ± 2890
72 hours post dose on Day 57994 ± 6892280 ± 2440
SecondaryStage 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SAR442501

Blood samples are collected to determine Cmax of SAR442501. The Cmax of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Stage 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SAR442501
ng/mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Stage 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SAR4425016440 ± 309010000 ± 3590
SecondaryStage 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of SAR442501

Blood samples are collected to determine tmax of SAR442501. The tmax of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
Reported as:
Median · hour
Stage 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of SAR442501
hourStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Stage 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of SAR44250111.00 (2.72 to 24.08)5.75 (2.67 to 11.03)
SecondaryStage 1: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-tau) of SAR442501

Blood samples are collected to determine AUC0-tau of SAR442501. The AUC0-tau of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
Reported as:
Mean · ng*hour/mL
Stage 1: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-tau) of SAR442501
ng*hour/mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Stage 1: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-tau) of SAR442501226000 ± 95700390000 ± 209000
SecondaryStage 1: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SAR442501

Blood samples are collected to determine Ctrough of SAR442501. The Ctrough of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Days 8, 29, 57, 92, 183, 274, 365 and 449
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Stage 1: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SAR442501
ng/mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Pre-dose on Day 8NA ± 66.8193 ± NA
Pre-dose on Day 29NA ± 112961 ± 1350
Pre-dose on Day 57215 ± 235495 ± 410
Pre-dose on Day 92349 ± 340886 ± 649
Pre-dose on Day 183565 ± 5162470 ± 3800
Pre-dose on Day 274282 ± 329888 ± 201
Pre-dose on Day 3651230 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Collagen X Biomarker (CXM) Level

Serum samples were collected to assess the change in CXM level with study drug. The CXM was also named PRO-C10 because the biomarker assay used was aimed to target the recognition of the C terminus of the NC1 domain of type X collagen. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline in CXM level has been reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · picogram per mL
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Collagen X Biomarker (CXM) Level
picogram per mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Collagen X Biomarker (CXM) Level0 ± 0—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Osteocalcin Level

Serum samples were collected to assess the change in osteocalcin level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · microgram (mcg) per mL
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Osteocalcin Level
microgram (mcg) per mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 267.32 ± 15.0621.27 ± 14.15
Week 52-1.99 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Level

Serum samples were collected to assess the change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/mL
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Level
mcg/mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-3.64 ± 19.49-1.94 ± 15.64
Week 52-7.28 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) Level

Serum samples were collected to assess the change in P1NP level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/mL
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) Level
mcg/mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 26-21.80 ± 144.4083.00 ± 122.67
Week 52-69.90 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Collagen-Type 1 C-Telopeptide (CTX) Level

Serum samples were collected to assess the change in CTX level with study drug. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/mL
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Collagen-Type 1 C-Telopeptide (CTX) Level
mcg/mLStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Week 260.06 ± 0.250.35 ± 0.28
Week 52-0.01 ± NA—
SecondaryStage 1: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to SAR442501

Serum samples were collected to assess the antibodies to SAR442501. Samples were screened and then confirmed for antibodies binding to SAR442501 and the titer of confirmed positive samples were reported. Positive ADA refers to pre-existing ADA at the pre-dose assessment on Day 1.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to SAR442501
participantsStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to SAR44250110
SecondaryStage 2: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Neurological Examination Findings

A complete neurological examination included assessment of mental status, motor function and balance, sensory exam, newborn and infant reflexes, muscle stretch reflexes in the older children and evaluation of the cranial nerves. The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over SAEs, other AEs and all-cause mortality (deaths) were collected from the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)0/10 (0%)1/10 (10%)5/10 (50%)
Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)4/6 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/100/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventStage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)
Blood 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol DecreasedInvestigations2/102/6
Rhinitis AllergicRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/101/6
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders0/101/6
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/101/6
Injection Site IndurationGeneral disorders0/101/6
LabyrinthitisInfections and infestations1/100/6
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/100/6
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/100/6
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/100/6
ThrombocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/100/6

Baseline characteristics

Enrolled population included all participants from screened population who were allocated to study drug regardless of whether the study drug was received or not, and regardless of replacement.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)Total
Mean6.8 ± 2.38.5 ± 2.57.5 ± 2.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)Total
Female516
Male5510
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A (Low Dose)Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B (High Dose)Total
Asian6612
Black or African American101
White303
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 0360001
    Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560002
    Shanghai, 200120, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560001
    Wuhan, 430030, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800002
    Milan, Lombardy 20122, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800001
    Rome, Roma 00168, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100001
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 03080, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100002
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 06351, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240002
    Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country 01008, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240001
    Esplugues de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña] 08950, Spain
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 8, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 22, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06067425
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2023
Start date
Oct 10, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2025
Completion
Feb 12, 2025
Results posted
Jun 25, 2026
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion