CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06065800STEADYUpdated Nov 17, 2025

STEELEX® Sternum Set + BONE WAX® + STEELEX® Electrode Set in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

An observational study in Sternum Closure, sponsored by Aesculap AG. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-17.

Sponsored by Aesculap AG · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and performance of using STEELEX® Sternum Set, BONE WAX® and STEELEX® Electrode Set in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint is the assessment of STEELEX® Sternum Set effectiveness for sternal healing at month 1 ± 1 week post-surgery. This study is designed as a prospective, non-interventional, single center, Post Market Clinical Follow-Up cohort study.

The products under investigation will be used in routine clinical practice and according to the instructions of use. No diagnostic or therapeutic intervention outside of routine clinical practice will be applied, and all study visits will coincide with those that will be scheduled for routine follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sternum Closure

Keywords

  • non resorbable suture
  • cardiac surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Aesculap AG is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing scheduled sternotomy for cardiac surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Scheduled sternotomy within the next 3 days.
  • Use of STEELEX® Sternum Set + Bone Wax® for sternotomy following routine clinical practice
  • Use of STEELEX® Electrode Set in temporary epicardial cardiac pacing during the postoperative phase of open-heart surgery in combination with an external pacemaker following routine clinical practice.
  • Written Informed Consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation or planned participation in any clinical trial before study follow-up is completed.
  • Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding.
  • Patient undergoing emergency surgery.
  • Patients taking medical consumption that might affect sternal healing (based on investigator's own clinical criteria)
  • Patient with any hypersensitivity or allergy to the components of the medical device.
  • Any medical or psychological disorder that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the study procedures.
  • Use of STEELEX® Electrode Set in permanent cardiac pacing or for permanent monitoring.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • STEELEX®

    STEELEX® Sternum Set in Patients undergoing cardiac surgery

    Device: STEELEX® Sternum Set

Interventions

  • DeviceSTEELEX® Sternum Set

    Sternal Closure with stainless steel suture (STEELEX®) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of STEELEX® Sternum Set effectiveness for sternal healing

    The primary variable will be the Sternal Instability Scale (SIS), based on a 4-point scale that is anchored by a grade of 0 that corresponds to a clinically stable sternum with no detectable motion or separation of the sternal edges and a grade 3 that corresponds to a completely separated sternum with marked increased motion or separation of the sternal edges

    Time frame: at month 1 ± 1 week post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of STEELEX® Sternum Set effectiveness for sternal healing

    The Sternal Instability Scale (SIS) is a clinical physical assessment tool that aims to assess the stability of the sternum and assign a corresponding grade to the findings of examination. It is based on a 4-point scale that is anchored by a grade of 0 that corresponds to a clinically stable sternum with no detectable motion or separation of the sternal edges and a grade 3 that corresponds to a completely separated sternum with marked increased motion or separation of the sternal edges measured at 6 months postoperative

    Time frame: at month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery

  2. Rate of sternal dehiscence over time

    Frequency of sternal dehiscence (classified in four types according to the deepness and in two sub-groups according to the vertical extension based on the inferior insertion of the pectoralis major muscle).

    Time frame: at month 1 ± 1 week and at month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery.

  3. Incidence of post-surgery sternal wound complications

    The incidence of post-surgery sternal wound complications at hospital discharge, at month 1 ± 1 week and month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery. Frequency of patients with sternal wound complications at hospital discharge, at month 1 ± 1 week and month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery.

    Time frame: at month 1 ± 1 week and at month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery.

  4. Incidence of post-surgery sternal wound infections

    The incidence of post-surgery wound infections during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up. Frequency of wound infections (superficial sternal wound infections \[SSWI\], or deep sternal wound infections \[DSWI\]) during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up.

    Time frame: at month 1 ± 1 week and at month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery.

  5. Incidence of re-exploration for bleeding over study period

    The incidence of re-exploration for bleeding during the 24-48h post-operation, at hospital discharge and 1-month ± 1 week of study follow-up. Frequency of re-exploration for bleeding until 1-month ± 1 week of study follow-up after surgery.

    Time frame: during the first 24-48 hours postoperatively, at hospital discharge (approximately 10 days after surgery), at month 1 ± 1 week

  6. Incidence of reoperations/readmission after surgery

    The incidence of reoperations/readmission after surgery during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up. Frequency of reoperation/readmission after surgery during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up.

    Time frame: during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up

  7. Length of hospital stay after surgery

    Calculated number of days between surgery and discharge of the patient from hospital

    Time frame: at hospital discharge (approximately 10 days after surgery)

  8. Progress of pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) compared to baseline

    The patient's self assessment of pain. This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), represented by a line 10 cm of length, which states "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "heavy pain". The value is measured in \[mm\] with a ruler and documented in whole numbers.

    Time frame: preoperatively (baseline), at hospital discharge (approximately 10 days after surgery), at month 1 ± 1 week and at month 6 ± 1 week post-surgery.

  9. Rate of adverse device effects (ADEs)

    The safety profile according to adverse device effects (ADEs) reported after surgery during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up. Frequencies of patients with ADEs reported during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up after surgery.

    Time frame: during the 6-month ± 1 week study follow-up.

  10. Effectiveness of STEELEX® Electrode Set

    The assessment of the STEELEX® Electrode Set effectiveness through the fixation ability of the electrode to the myocardium prior to removal. Percentage of patients with positive or negative myocardial stimulation at hospital discharge.

    Time frame: at hospital discharge (approximately 10 days after surgery)

  11. Mean score of the intraoperative handling questions on STEELEX® Sternum Set and STEELEX® Electrode Set

    The assessment of the STEELEX® Sternum Set and STEELEX® Electrode Set intraoperative handling through the physician opinion after surgery: Handling of STEELEX® Sternum Set is assessed in five dimensions (on a descending scale from excellent = 5 points to poor = 1 point) in five categories (Knot security, Tensile strength, Needle strength, Passage / Penetration of the needle through the bone, Quality of the connection between the needle and the thread). Handling of STEELEX® Electrode Set is assessed in five dimensions (on a descending scale from excellent = 5 points to poor = 1 point) in four categories (Wire placement in the myocardium, Straight break-off needle connection to the patient cable, Removal of STEELEX® Electrode set of the patient, Tensile strength) The points are added to a handling score ranging from a maximum of 45 to a minimum of 9 points.

    Time frame: intraoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06065800
Lead sponsor
Aesculap AG
Collaborators
B.Braun Surgical SA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2023
Start date
May 17, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2024
Completion
Apr 11, 2025
Last update
Nov 17, 2025

Study contacts

Juan Martinez León, Dr.
principal investigator · Department of Cardiovascular Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion