An interventional study of Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in Perfectionism, sponsored by Utah State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-28.
Sponsored by Utah State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to test self-help books for adults with perfectionism. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will be randomized into either the ACT self-help condition, CBT self-help condition, or waitlist control condition:
Perfectionism is a multidimensional construct where individuals develop unrealistically high standards and attribute self-value to meeting these expectations. Perfectionism has also been shown to be a risk and a maintenance factor for a range of psychological difficulties such as depression, social anxiety, eating disorders, and obsessive-compulsive related disorders (Limburg et al., 2017). Furthermore, the prevalence of perfectionism is increasing in undergraduate students according to a recent meta-analysis (Curran \& Hill, 2019), highlighting the need to expand accessible treatment options. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) have both demonstrated clinical effectiveness in targeting unhelpful perfectionism, but it is unclear how effective these psychotherapies are at decreasing perfectionism when applied in a bibliotherapy format.
The present study aims to assess the feasibility and efficacy of ACT and CBT self-help books for perfectionism over a 10-week intervention period and one month follow-up assessment, in comparison to a waitlist control condition. Additionally, this study will examine the impact of bibliotherapies on processes of change (i.e., psychological acceptance and cognitive reappraisal) as well as general distress, well-being, and affect. Participants will be adult students recruited from two universities in the mountain and midwestern regions of the United States and participants will complete self-report assessments at pre-, mid-, post-intervention, and follow-up. For the primary aim evaluating efficacy, we predict both ACT (The Anxious Perfectionist) and CBT (When Perfect Isn't Good Enough by Martin Antony) self-help books will decrease unhelpful perfectionism from pre-intervention to follow-up, in comparison to a waitlist control group. For the secondary aim evaluating processes of change, we predict that (1) ACT will increase psychological flexibility more than CBT, and (2) CBT will increase cognitive reappraisal more than ACT, from pre-intervention to follow-up. For our third aim evaluating changes in distress, well-being, and affect, we predict that (1) both ACT and CBT will decrease distress and general negative affect, and (2) ACT will outperform CBT on increases in well-being and general positive affect from pre-treatment to follow-up. For our fourth aim assessing bibliotherapy acceptability and feasibility, we predict no differences between adherence and satisfaction ratings between the ACT and CBT reading conditions.
Utah State University is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will read 10 chapters (140 pages) of The Anxious Perfectionist by Clarissa Ong and Michael Twohig over the course of 10 weeks.
Behavioral: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)
Participants will read 8 chapters (149 pages) of When Perfect Isn't Good Enough by Martin Antony over the course of 10 weeks.
Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
Waitlist condition; assessment only
ACT is a psychological intervention that aims to improve psychological flexibility, the ability to hold thoughts and emotions lightly in a given context and pursue valued ends (Hayes et al., 1999; Twohig \& Levin, 2017).
CBT is a psychological intervention which targets cognitions and behaviors in attempt to change emotions.
Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-Brief (FMPS-Brief)
The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-Brief (FMPS-Brief) is an 8-item self-report measure assessing perfectionism with two sub-scales: evaluative concerns and striving. Total scores range from 8 to 40, where higher scores indicate higher perfectionism.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire 3 (AAQ-3)
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire 3 (AAQ-3) is a 7-item self-report measure assessing psychological inflexibility. Total AAQ-3 scores range from 7 to 49, where higher scores indicate greater psychological inflexibility.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Cognitive Reappraisal Subscale (ERQ-CR)
The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - Cognitive Reappraisal Subscale (ERQ-CR) a 5-item self-report measure assessing use of cognitive reappraisal as an emotional regulation strategy. Total ERQ-CR scores are averaged and range from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater use of cognitive reappraisal.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a 21-item self-report measure that assess general distress with three sub-scales: depression, anxiety, and stress. Sum scores are calculated by adding the subscale items and multiplying by two, so total scores range from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating more distress.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) is a 14-item self-report measure assessing emotional, social, and psychological well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 70 where high score indicate greater levels of positive well-being.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a 20-item self-report measure assessing state affect with 10 positive affect (e.g., attentive, active, alert, excited, enthusiastic, determined, inspired, proud, interested, and strong) and 10 negative affect (e.g., hostile, irritable, ashamed, guilty, distressed, upset, scared, afraid, jittery, nervous) items. Total scores are calculated separately for positive and negative affect subscales, both range from 10 to 50 where higher scores indicate higher affect.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Utah State University