ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06049784Updated Aug 18, 2026

Prelabor Visual Biofeedback by a Self-operated Ultrasound Device

An interventional study of Visual Biofeedback using self operated home ultrasound device and Visual Biofeedback using ultrasound at hospital in Obstetric Labor Complications and Obstetric Trauma, sponsored by Rabin Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Rabin Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
159
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A substantial number of women report fear of childbirth and negative birth experiences. The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of visual biofeedback before labor using a self-operated home ultrasound for maternal pushing training, which is expected to reduce fear of childbirth, increase perceived control during birth, prevent prolonged labor and the ensuing maternal and neonatal negative adverse outcomes, and prevent maternal post-traumatic stress symptoms. Intrapartum visual biofeedback provided by obstetricians during the second stage of labor has been shown to increase pushing efficiency and improve maternal obstetric and psychological outcomes. Previously, visual biofeedback has been implemented only in an in-hospital setting and, with one known exception, only during labor. A Mobile Self-Operated Home Ultrasound System has been reported as a feasible and reliable tool for obstetrical ultrasound. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with three study groups of pregnant women (37 weeks of gestation and above): (1) Obstetrical ultrasound+visual biofeedback in-hospital and at home using self-operated ultrasound; (2) Obstetrical ultrasound+visual biofeedback in-hospital; (3) Obstetrical ultrasound only. Visual biofeedback by ultrasound will be performed by transperineal ultrasound, enabling the future mother to visualize the descent of the fetal head within the birth canal in response to her pushing effort. Follow-up will be conducted approximately one week later and at six weeks postpartum. Positive results following the application of biofeedback by self-operated home ultrasound may change the paradigm for pre-labor sonographic education. Self-operated home ultrasound will also enable more comprehensive pre-labor ultrasound-based education and hopefully reduce adverse physical and psychological outcomes following childbirth.

Read the detailed description

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of visual biofeedback prior to labor, which involves a single hospital session combined with a self-administered home ultrasound to train mothers in pushing techniques during the second stage of labor. The approach integrates a one-time pre-labor training session at the clinic, as previously explored by Youssef et al. (2021), with a continued intervention conducted by participants at home until delivery. This method is anticipated to enhance the benefits noted in prior research. The study will examine the impact of this training intervention and collect comprehensive data on obstetric and psychological outcomes, including medical records and self-report questionnaires completed by participants before and after childbirth. The intervention seeks to mitigate maternal and neonatal obstetric complications and other adverse outcomes. The specific objectives of this study are:

  1. to decrease the duration of the second stage of labor, minimize medical interventions during labor, and lessen birth-related complications;
  2. to alleviate prenatal fear of childbirth and bolster confidence in the birthing process;
  3. to enhance perceived personal control during labor and increase satisfaction with the birthing experience;
  4. to improve maternal-infant bonding and reduce incidences of post-traumatic stress symptoms;
  5. to explore participants' experiences with the at-home, self-managed intervention and its effectiveness through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with a subset of the participants involved in this study.
02

Conditions studied

  • Obstetric Labor Complications
  • Obstetric Trauma

Keywords

  • Visual Biofeedback
  • Self Operated Ultrasound device
  • Second stage of labor
  • Trans Perineal Ultrasound
03

In context

Obstetric Labor Complications

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Obstetric Labor Complications; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 159 is close to the median of 159 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Obstetric Labor Complications.

Browse Obstetric Labor Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Rabin Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nuliparity
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Planned for vaginal delivery
  • Low risk pregnancy
  • Ability to fulfill a questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multifetal gestation
  • for vaginal delivery (Placenta previa, Breech presentation etc.)
  • High risk pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
159 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Visual Biofeedback using self operated home ultrasound device

    Sonographic fetal weight and biophysical profiles will be done at the hospital clinic. A single ultrasound biofeedback session using transperineal ultrasound (TPU) will guide maternal pushing. The process includes (a) Ultrasound assessing fetal head descent with the screen facing the provider, measuring the angle of progression (AOP); (b) Explaining anatomical landmarks to the patient; (c) Repeat AOP measurement with the screen facing the patient for biofeedback; (d) Reassess with the screen turned away. Participants will receive a handheld home ultrasound device and will learn to perform self-biofeedback at home, ideally twice a week until delivery. Session records will be sent electronically to the sonographer for assessment and feedback. All groups will complete questionnaires three times: (1) baseline, (2) approximately one week later (after home biofeedback training), and (3) six weeks postpartum.

    Device: Visual Biofeedback using self operated home ultrasound device

  • Active comparator
    Visual biofeedback at the Hospital

    A sonographic fetal weight estimate and biophysical profile will occur at the hospital clinic for all patients. A single ultrasound-based biofeedback session will employ TPU for maternal pushing guidance. This process involves (a) Assessing fetal head descent with ultrasound to measure the angle of progression (AOP) during rest and pushing; (b) Explaining anatomical landmarks to the patient; (c) Repeating the AOP measurement as biofeedback; (d) Reassessing with the screen turned away. Participants will complete questionnaires three times: (1) baseline, (2) two weeks later, and (3) six to eight weeks postpartum.

    Device: Visual Biofeedback using ultrasound at hospital

  • No intervention
    Control / Standard care - Obstetrical ultrasound only

    A sonographic estimated fetal weight and biophysical profile will be performed in the hospital. The participant will fill in questionnaires at three time points: (1) at baseline, before the ultrasound examination; (2) about two weeks later (i.e., after completing the self-operated visual biofeedback training at home, or at an equivalent time for the other two groups); (3) six to eight weeks postpartum.

Interventions

  • DeviceVisual Biofeedback using self operated home ultrasound device

    participants will receive a handheld home ultrasound device, learning to perform self-biofeedback at home. Session records will be sent electronically to the sonographer for assessment and feedback.

  • DeviceVisual Biofeedback using ultrasound at hospital

    A single ultrasound biofeedback session using Transperineal Ultrasound will guide maternal pushing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The length of the second stage of labour

    measure by time

    Time frame: up to 1 week after labor

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mode of delivery

    Number of participants with spontaneous vaginal delivery or operative delivery (operative assisted - vacuum assisted/forceps, cesarean delivery)

    Time frame: up to 1 week after labor

  2. OASIS - obstetrical anal sphincter injuries

    Number of Participants with severe perineal tear

    Time frame: up to 1 week after labor

  3. Low neonatal APGAR score

    number of participants who delivered a neonate with APGAR score \< 7 at 5 minutes after birth

    Time frame: up to 1 week after labor

  4. NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) hospitalization

    number of participants who delivered a neonate transferred to the NICU

    Time frame: up to 1 week after labor

  5. Fear of childbirth

    Number of participants who demonstrated fear of childbirth according to questionnaires

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks before labor

  6. PTSS (post traumatic stress symptoms)

    Number of participants who demonstrated PTSS according to questionnaires

    Time frame: up to 3 months post partum

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gilboa Y, Frenkel TI, Schlesinger Y, Rousseau S, Hamiel D, Achiron R, Perlman S. Visual biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):91-96. doi: 10.1002/uog.18962. Epub 2018 May 29. PubMed 29155474 ↗
  • Bellussi F, Alcamisi L, Guizzardi G, Parma D, Pilu G. Traditionally vs sonographically coached pushing in second stage of labor: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):87-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.19044. Epub 2018 May 30. PubMed 29532533 ↗
  • Hadar E, Wolff L, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Eisner M, Shmueli A, Barbash-Hazan S, Bergel R, Shmuel E, Houri O, Dollinger S, Brzezinski-Sinai NA, Sukenik S, Pardo A, Navon I, Wilk Y, Zafrir-Danieli H, Wiznitzer A. Mobile Self-Operated Home Ultrasound System for Remote Fetal Assessment During Pregnancy. Telemed J E Health. 2022 Jan;28(1):93-101. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0541. Epub 2021 Mar 15. PubMed 33729014 ↗
  • Schlesinger Y, Hamiel D, Rousseau S, Perlman S, Gilboa Y, Achiron R, Frenkel TI. Preventing risk for posttraumatic stress following childbirth: Visual biofeedback during childbirth increases maternal connectedness to her newborn thereby preventing risk for posttraumatic stress following childbirth. Psychol Trauma. 2022 Sep;14(6):1057-1065. doi: 10.1037/tra0000558. Epub 2020 Feb 27. PubMed 32105133 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All collected data will be securely stored and used solely for research, analysis, and reporting within the scope of this study. Any results or findings that we may share with the scientific community or the public will be presented in aggregated, de-identified, and anonymized formats to protect participant privacy. Our primary focus is to use the gathered data for research purposes, and we do not anticipate sharing individual participant data beyond the confines of this study's objectives.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 45 months after the start.

Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Obstetric Labor Complications, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 45 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2023
First posted
Sep 22, 2023
StartActual
Dec 31, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Aug 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06049784
Collaborators
Tel Aviv University
Responsible party
Sharon Perlman (Senior attending physician, Proffesor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 22, 2023
Start date
Dec 31, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Shira Waks
Contact
Shiraw@clalit.org.il
972528557212
Sharon Perlman, MD
Contact
drsharonperlman@gmail.com
972547481097
Sharon Perlman, MD
principal investigator · Rabin Medical Center, affiliated to the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Natav Hendin, MD
principal investigator · Rabin Medical Center, affiliated to the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion