ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06040008IMENUpdated Sep 20, 2024

Investigating the Impact of Environmental Factors on the Transcriptomics Profile in Healthy Individuals

An observational study in Healthy Volunteers, sponsored by CENTOGENE GmbH Rostock. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-20.

Sponsored by CENTOGENE GmbH Rostock · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Changes in biology will be reflected by changes in the composition of Ribonucleic acid (RNA) in the blood. An example of that would be environmental changes, e.g. diet, acute illness, temperature. The main goal of this study is to study the impact of environmental changes in blood transcriptomics in healthy individuals over time.

Read the detailed description

The project is aiming to evaluate the impact of environmental changes on the blood transcriptome and to assess the feasibility of different sample collection materials for this purpose. Transcriptome from EDTA-DBS. Performing RNAseq from EDTA-DBS, Finger-Prick- DBS and PAXgene RNA tubes has resulted in different levels of analytical "background noise".

To measure the reflection of this noise, we aim to collect and evaluate blood samples of participating healthy individuals on different time points, to discover how suitable, the DBS is in detecting changes caused by environmental factors (diet, acute disease, temperature). The environmental factors should have variable severity of changes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Healthy volunteers
03

In context

Lead sponsor

CENTOGENE GmbH Rostock is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

healthy participants

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Voluntary, is obtained from the subject before enrollment in the study
  • The subject is 18 years or older (≥18 years)
  • Healthy participants, as declared by the subject
  • Healthy status is defined by the absence of evidence of any active or chronic disease at the beginning of the study
  • Available to participate for the planned duration of the study for which the screening is being done

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • The subject had any disease

      • Any clinically relevant history or the presence of e.g., respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematological, lymphatic, neurological, cardiovascular, psychiatric, etc. chronic disease
      • Concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with, or treatment of which might interfere with, the conduct of the study, or that would, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject in this study
      • A condition in which repeated blood draws poses more than minimal risk for the subject such as hemophilia, other severe coagulation disorders or significantly impaired venous access
      • In the opinion of the investigator, subject is at high risk of non-compliance and is unsuitable in any other way to participate in this study
      • No obtained from the subject
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • healthy volunteers

    Healthy status is defined by the absence of evidence of any active or chronic disease at the beginning of the study

    Genetic: blood collection

Interventions

  • Geneticblood collection

    * 3 blood collections over a period of 6 weeks * V0 - Inclusion * V1 - 3 weeks ± 14 days * V2 - 3 weeks ± 14 days * 1 EDTA 4 ml tube, 1 PAXgene RNA tube 2,5 ml and drops of blood from finger-prick are taken at each visit * Clinical information obtained at each visit

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. study the impact of environmental changes in blood transcriptomics

    Changes in biology will be reflected by changes in the composition of Ribonucleic acid (RNA) in the blood. An example of that would be environmental changes, e.g. diet, acute illness, temperature.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. different sample collection materials

    The secondary goal is to evaluate the feasibility of different sample collection materials. RNA collected from PAXgene RNA tubes is a gold standard for RNA extraction from blood. However, CENTOGENE devised an alternative method to obtain RNA from CentoCard® (or Dried-Blood-Spot card/DBS). There is a systematic difference between these methods regarding the extraction and depletion of hemoglobin.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centogene GmbH
    Rostock, MV 18055, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Feb 2024, 9 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 6, 2023
First posted
Sep 15, 2023
StartActual
May 9, 2023
Primary completionActual
Feb 29, 2024
CompletionActual
Feb 29, 2024
Last update
Sep 20, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06040008
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2023
Start date
May 9, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 29, 2024
Completion
Feb 29, 2024
Last update
Sep 20, 2024

Study contacts

Tobias Böttcher, MD
principal investigator · CENTOGENE GmbH Rostock

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion