CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06038825Updated May 16, 2024

The Effect of Topical Vibration on Injection Pain in Scalp Block

An interventional study of topical vibration in Analgesia, sponsored by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-16.

Sponsored by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study; it's aimed to reduce injection pain during the practice of scalp block, which is used as a method of anesthesia in patients who underwent awake craniotomy surgery. For this purpose, the investigators used topical vibration stimulation, which is non-invasive procedure.

Read the detailed description

Scalp block is an analgesia technique frequently used in neurosurgical procedures. In this block, while providing adequate anesthesia for surgery, it also helps to preserve hemodynamics by inhibiting pain sensation. In this block, there is a certain degree of pain due to multiple injections. The transmission of pain sensation to the cortex is reduced by costimulating the receptors that transmit the pain sensation with vibration stimulus. In this study; it was aimed to investigate the effect of topical vibration on injection pain in participants who received sedoanalgesia with dexmedetomidine in bilateral scalp block practice.

In routine clinical practice, bilateral scalp block (local anesthetic injection into greater occipital, lesser occipital, supratrochlear, supraorbital, auriculotemporal, zygomaticotemporal nerves) is performed in participants who is sedated. While local anesthetic is injecting, vibration device (Aprilla brand, giving 6000 vibrations per minute) will be vibrated for 10 seconds and then local anesthetic will be injected. Meanwhile, participants' numerical pain scores (NRS) and hemodynamic parameters will be monitored.

In this study, the NRS scores and hemodynamic variables of the participants will be compared during the local anesthetic application of each 6 nerves bilaterally and during the injections of the nerves with and without the use of vibration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Analgesia

Keywords

  • scalp clock
  • awake craniotomy
  • vibration
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • between the ages of 18-75
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Scoring I-III
  • Cases in which scalp block will be applied

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA score IV

    • Uncooperative
    • Known allergy to any of the study drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    topical vibration

    For all patients one half of the scalp was injected with vibration device.

    Device: topical vibration

  • No intervention
    control

    Same patient's other side of the scalp was injected without vibration device.

Interventions

  • Devicetopical vibration

    topical vibration (Aprilla brand, giving 6000 vibrations per minute) is a device for pain relief during injection of local anesthetic.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain score (NRS)

    0 ; no pain,10; the worst pain ever possible

    Time frame: during needling (injection) procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame: baseline, during needling procedure, 1 min after needling

  2. Heart Rate (beat/min)

    Time frame: baseline, during needling procedure, 1 min after needling

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
    Ankara, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kuwahara H, Ogawa R. Using a Vibration Device to Ease Pain During Facial Needling and Injection. Eplasty. 2016 Feb 4;16:e9. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26933468 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06038825
Lead sponsor
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Responsible party
derya özkan (professor medical doctor, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2024
Completion
Feb 28, 2024
Last update
May 16, 2024

Study contacts

nur yilmaz, specialist
principal investigator · Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion