CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06035588Updated Oct 2, 2025

Effectiveness of 16% Carbamide Peroxide in Reducing Hypersensitivity During Alternate-day Home Bleaching

An interventional study of Daily whitening and Alternate whitening in Dental Hypersensitivity and Teeth Whitening, sponsored by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-02.

Sponsored by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The concentration of 16% carbamide peroxide is the highest concentration that European regulations allow for use in home whitening (Council directive 2011/84/EU). This concentration allows for faster results, but instead patients may suffer more frequently from dental sensitivity. The most commonly described side effect of all whitening procedures is the appearance of dentin hypersensitivity, hence the efforts to counteract or overcome this adverse effect.

The objective of the study is to clinically evaluate the difference in dental hypersensitivity produced by home dental whitening treatment using 16% carbamide peroxide in a tray for two hours daily applied daily or every other day for three weeks.

Read the detailed description

Volunteers will be instructed to use the whitening gel once a day for 2 hours, completing a total of 3 weeks of whitening procedure. Depending on the randomization, the bleaching procedure will be performed every other day or daily. In the upper arch, the teeth to be whitened will be from 15 to 25. The evaluations of efficacy, dental sensitivity and satisfaction will be carried out in the upper and lower arch. The color will be recorded before, weekly for 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after finishing the treatment. Shade assessment using the subjective method will be recorded with the Vita Classical color scale (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), it will also be determined with the Vita 3D-MASTER scale (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). For objective evaluation, the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) will be used, according to the CIEL*a*b* system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Hypersensitivity
  • Teeth Whitening

Keywords

  • bleaching
  • hipersensitivity
  • whitening
  • at-home
  • carbamide
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Patients with vital teeth without restorations, single crowns, implants and/or bridges at the level of the anterior teeth.
  • Absence of cavities in the teeth to be whitened.
  • Patients with satisfactory oral hygiene and periodontally healthy, who are not undergoing periodontal maintenance and who do not use chlorhexidine mouthwashes. Patients with recessions without presenting sensitivity will be included.
  • Absence of sensitivity, measured with the application of air with the dental team's syringe.
  • Patients whose canines have at least an A2-A3 shade (VITA Classic® Guide).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously undergone whitening (less than 5 years).
  • Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients with white spots or alterations in the development of enamel or with stains.
  • Patients with a history of trauma to anterior teeth.
  • Patients who require internal whitening.
  • Smokers.
  • Pregnant or lactating.
  • Patients with allergies to any whitening component.
  • Patients presenting alterations of the oral mucosa (desquamative gingivitis, oral lichen planus, leukoplakia, etc.).
  • Patients with medical conditions considered by the researchers that may compromise the study or the individual safety of the patient.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene.
  • Patients with previous hypersensitivity.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Daily whitening

    Volunteers should whiten daily with a whitening tray from 15 to 25 and 35 to 45 for 2 hours. This procedure will last 3 weeks.

    Other: Daily whitening

  • Experimental
    Alternate whitening

    Volunteers will bleach for 3 weeks with 16% carbamide peroxide, alternating one rest day for each placement day. They will wear a whitening tray from 15 to 25 and from 35 to 45 for 2 hours.

    Other: Alternate whitening

Interventions

  • OtherDaily whitening

    Daily application of a 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel in volunteers without sensitivity.

  • OtherAlternate whitening

    Volunteers will apply the whitening gel at 16% carbamide peroxide, alternating a rest day with an application day. Patients should not be sensitive before starting the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dental Sensitivity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-10

    The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the incidence of tooth sensitivity induced by home whitening with 16% carbamide peroxide applied in a tray for two hours daily or every other day for three weeks. For the assessment, the operators will apply air to the cervical area of the upper and lower canines and ask the patient if he/she experienced sensitivity at any time during the treatment.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Whitening Efficacy CIEL*a*b*

    To assess whether the efficacy of the 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching treatment described above when used every other day is the same as when used every day, or whether there is a difference in bleaching efficacy. This will be determined at check-ups by measuring the upper and lower canines with the Vita EasyShade V® spectrophotometer, based on the CIEL\*a\*b\* system, according to the CIELAB system, CIEDE2000 and the whiteness index. Where L\* represents the value from 0 (black) to 100 (white) and a\* and b\* represent the colour, where a\* is the measurement along the red-green axis and b\* is the measurement along the yellow-blue axis. In addition, the operators will take shade readings on all 4 canines using the VITA Classical and 3D-MASTER guides.

    Time frame: 1 month

Other outcomes

  1. Gingival irritation VAS (0-10)

    Using the Visual Analogue Scale, compare the presence of gingival irritation after every other day bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide compared to daily application. The patient should rate the gingival irritation experienced on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being very irritating and 0 being not irritating at all.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  2. Patient's oral quality of life (OHIP-14)

    The impact of treatment outcome on the patient's oral quality of life (OHIP-14) will be assessed using a questionnaire after 16% carbamide peroxide home bleaching. The patient will complete a 14-question questionnaire on a daily basis, regardless of which group he/she belongs to, daily or alternate application.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Isabel Giraldez de Luis
    Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cardoso PC, Reis A, Loguercio A, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN. Clinical effectiveness and tooth sensitivity associated with different bleaching times for a 10 percent carbamide peroxide gel. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Oct;141(10):1213-20. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0048. PubMed 20884923 ↗
  • Chagas AS, Freitas KMS, Cancado RH, Valarelli FP, Canuto LFG, Oliveira RCG, Oliveira RCG. Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers. Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):63-68. doi: 10.2319/031319-197.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22. PubMed 31335161 ↗
  • de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Boing TF, Loguercio AD, Reis A. At-home Bleaching With 10% vs More Concentrated Carbamide Peroxide Gels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;43(4):E210-E222. doi: 10.2341/17-222-L. PubMed 29949477 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The results obtained will only be shared once they have been published in an impact journal.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06035588
Lead sponsor
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Responsible party
Isabel Giráldez de Luis (Lecturer of Department for Conservative Dentistry at Rey Juan Carlos University, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Start date
Jan 6, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2025
Completion
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 2, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion