CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06017791Updated Mar 23, 2026

Management of Excess Gingival Display Using Tunnel Technique With 3D Designed PEEK Shell: A Case Series

An interventional study of tunnel technique with a 3D printed PEEK shell to fill the skeletal subnasal depression in Excessive Gingival Display, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-23.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the use of a PEEK shell placed in the anterior maxilla placed by tunnel technique in decreasing the gingival display

Read the detailed description

While lip repositioning has been established as a treatment modality to address excess gum display (EGD) , an often overlooked contributing factor is the lack of lip support. This is often caused by the architecture of the maxilla at the subnasal area. Maxillary overgrowth may give rise to a subnasal skeletal depression producing decreased lip support and marked upper lip retraction during a smile.

Restricting muscle pull by lip repositioning surgery as a treatment option limits muscle movement, however it does not address lip support. In 2018 an alternative intervention was later proposed in a case report study . The technique involves raising a full thickness flap and applying PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) cement to fill the subnasal depression and limit the upper lip movement. Since its introduction, a limited number of studies have attempted to investigate the technique, however there are not enough studies to support the outcome or the stability of the technique. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the use of a tunnel technique with a 3D printed PEEK (Polyetherether ketone) shell to fill the skeletal subnasal depression

02

Conditions studied

  • Excessive Gingival Display
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with excess gingival display 2.5mm or more
  • Patients with an exaggerated subnasal concavity
  • Decreased/normal value of SNA ( angle between sella, nation, A point) in cephalometric measurement
  • Decreased/normal cephalometric measurement of A to N-perpendicular (perpendicular from N on FHP)
  • Decreased/normal value in cephalometric measurement of the convexity at point A (linear measurement from point A to facial plane)
  • Decreased/normal value of Ricketts Esthetic plane in cephalometric measurement
  • Decreased/normal value of Holdaway H-angle in cephalometric measurement
  • Nasolabial angle range from 100° to 120°
  • Patients 20-60 years old
  • Medically free
  • Compliant patient that agrees to the follow up period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Smokers
  • Diabetics
  • Patients with parafunctional habits that may affect the outcome of the procedure
  • Medically compromised patients
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEEK shell in the anterior maxilla inserted by tunnel technique

    use of a minimally invasive tunnel technique to fill the skeletal subnasal depression with a PEEK shell in patients with an exaggerated subnasal depression associated with lack of lip support and excessive lip translation

    Other: tunnel technique with a 3D printed PEEK shell to fill the skeletal subnasal depression

Interventions

  • Othertunnel technique with a 3D printed PEEK shell to fill the skeletal subnasal depression

    The area will be anesthetized using infiltration technique with 1.5ml of anesthetic solution containing Articaine Hydrochloride 68 mg/1.7 ml with Adrenaline 0.017 mg/1.7 ml Two bilateral full thickness vertical incisions will be created using a #15 blade. One on each side of the frenum A subperiosteal tunnel connecting the two vertical incisions will be created using a periosteal elevator/tunneling knife until the complete communication between the two ends is established The custom made PEEK framework will be inserted from the incision on one side and eased through until it sits in the subnasal concavity. Once fitted in place the shell will be fixed in place using two mini screws bilaterally, one on each side. The two vertical incisions will be closed by interrupted sutures 6-0 Polyglycolic acid suture material

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gingival display

    measured using a periodontal probe in millimeters

    Time frame: Day 0 - Month 3 - Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. lip translation

    measured using a periodontal probe in millimeters

    Time frame: Day 0 - Month 3 - Month 6

  2. profile angle

    lateral cephalometric xray

    Time frame: Day 0 - Month 6

  3. lip length

    measured using a periodontal probe in millimeters

    Time frame: Day 0 - Month 3 - Month 6

  4. patient satisfaction

    measured by a binary Questionnaire ( yes or no)

    Time frame: Day 7

  5. Post operative pain

    Measured by the visual analogue scale ( 0 no pain, 10 worst pain)

    Time frame: Day 7

  6. blinded esthetic assessment

    measured by a binary scale (yes or no)

    Time frame: Month 3- Month 6

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Farah Mamdouh
    Cairo, 11835, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brizuela M, Ines D. Excessive Gingival Display. 2023 Mar 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470437/ PubMed 29262052 ↗
  • El-Bokle, Dalia & Ghany, Amany. (2022). A sequential diagnostic scheme for excessive gingival display (Gummy Smile). AJO-DO Clinical Companion. 2. 10.1016/j.xaor.2022.05.003
  • Impellizzeri A, Palmigiani R, Horodynski M, D'alfonso T, Polimeni A, De Stefano A, Galluccio G. Is There a Correlation between Gingival Display and Incisal Inclination in a Gummy Smile? Study on Cephalometric Parameters. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;11(3):344. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030344. PubMed 36766919 ↗
  • Monaco A, Streni O, Marci MC, Marzo G, Gatto R, Giannoni M. Gummy smile: clinical parameters useful for diagnosis and therapeutical approach. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004 Fall;29(1):19-25. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.29.1.y01l3r4m06q3k2x0. PubMed 15554398 ↗
  • Toth, J. M. (2012). Biocompatibility of Polyaryletheretherketone Polymers. PEEK Biomaterials Handbook, 81-92. doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-4463-7.10007-7
  • Freitas de Andrade P, Meza-Mauricio J, Kern R, Faveri M. Labial Repositioning Using Print Manufactured Polymethylmethacrylate- (PMMA-) Based Cement for Gummy Smile. Case Rep Dent. 2021 Dec 21;2021:7607522. doi: 10.1155/2021/7607522. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34970460 ↗
  • Arcuri T, da Costa MFP, Ribeiro IM, Barreto BD Junior, Lyra eSilva JP. Labial repositioning using polymethylmethracylate (PMMA)-based cement for esthetic smile rehabilitation-A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;49:194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 17. PubMed 30029078 ↗
  • ASSENZA, B. & Carinci, Francesco & CRISTINZI, A. & Sinjari, Bruna & Murmura, Giovanna & Scarano, Antonio. (2011). A COSMETIC TECHNIQUE CALLED LIP REPOSITIONING IN PATIENT OF EXCESSIVE GINGIVAL DISPLAY. European Journal of Inflammation. 9. 115-119.
  • Dym H, Pierre R 2nd. Diagnosis and Treatment Approaches to a "Gummy Smile". Dent Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;64(2):341-349. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 24. PubMed 32111273 ↗
  • Saleem R, Kukreja BJ, Goyal M, Kumar M. Treating short upper lip with "Unified lip repositioning" technique: Two case reports. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Jan-Feb;26(1):89-93. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_90_20. Epub 2022 Jan 1. PubMed 35136324 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06017791
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Farah Mamdouh Abdelfatah Mohamed Sheeba (Principal investigator, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 30, 2023
Start date
Nov 8, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 7, 2026
Completion
Jan 7, 2026
Last update
Mar 23, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion