ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06016595Updated Aug 29, 2023

Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Patients

An observational study in Chronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Hisar Intercontinental Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to male participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-29.

Sponsored by Hisar Intercontinental Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
112
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a common health problem among men and can cause severe quality of life. The pathophysiology of CPPS is still poorly understood and effective treatments are a challenging issue. This study aims to investigate the possible relationship between the presence of microorganisms in the prostatic fluid and symptom severity by presenting a retrospective analysis based on data from CPPS patients.

Read the detailed description

This study is based on data from 112 CPPS patients aged 20-60 years. Various variables such as demographic information of the patients, International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), which evaluates CPPS symptoms, inflammatory and non-inflammatory symptoms of CPPS, baseline scores of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), which evaluates erectile function, and the presence of microorganisms in the prostate fluid were analyzed retrospectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatitis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatitis; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 112 is below the median of 147 across 13 observational studies indexed under Prostatitis.

Browse Prostatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hisar Intercontinental Hospital is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This study is based on data from 112 CPPS patients aged 20-60 years. Various variables such as demographic information of the patients, International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), which evaluates CPPS symptoms, inflammatory and non-inflammatory symptoms of CPPS, baseline scores of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), which evaluates erectile function, and the presence of microorganisms in the prostate fluid were analyzed retrospectively.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who were diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and whose prostate fluid was taken with prostate massage and androflor testis were studied were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute and/or chronic bacterial prostatitis, active history of genitourinary cancer, history of recent prostate surgery the diagnosis of neurological diseases affecting the bladder was determined
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • singel

    Diagnostic Test: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

    Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome UPOINT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between androflor pcr positive patients and uopint and nih-cpsi

    Those with positive and negative Androflor PCR test will be evaluated. testicular torsion

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hisar Intercontinental Hospital
    Istanbul, 34768, Turkey
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2020 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 35 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 16, 2023
First posted
Aug 29, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2022
CompletionActual
May 10, 2023
Last update
Aug 29, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06016595
Lead sponsor
Hisar Intercontinental Hospital
Responsible party
Basri Cakiroglu (Ass. Prof., Hisar Intercontinental Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 29, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
May 10, 2023
Last update
Aug 29, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion