CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06015204Updated Feb 6, 2025

Assessment of the C8 Dermatomal Block with Photoplethysmographic Amplitude After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

An interventional study of Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots and Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C8 nerve roots in Brachial Plexus Block and Oximetry, sponsored by JongHae Kim. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-06.

Sponsored by JongHae Kim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of photoplethysmographic amplitude in assessing the extent of anesthesia in the 8th cervical dermatome in patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB). The main question it aims to answer is

  • Is there any difference in the post-block changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the ipsilateral 5th finger (supplied by the 8th cervical nerve root) between ISBPBs targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots and the C5-to-C8 nerve roots?
  • Do the changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude represent the extent of anesthesia in the 8th cervical dermatome? Participants will receive either ISBPB targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots or the C5-to-C8 nerve roots, and then the changes in photoplethysmographic amplitude will be measured from the 5th finger ipsilateral to ISBPB.
02

Conditions studied

  • Brachial Plexus Block
  • Oximetry
03

In context

Lead sponsor

JongHae Kim is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2
  • Schedule to receive interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy
  • Peripheral vascular diseases
  • Arrhythmias
  • Cardiac conduction abnormalities
  • A history of medication affecting cardiac conduction
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Thyroid dysfunction
  • Other medical conditions affecting autonomic nervous activity
  • Infection at the skin area for interscalene brachial plexus block
  • Peripheral neuropathy or neurologic sequelae in the upper limb ipsilateral to the surgery
  • Allergy to local anesthetics or a history of allergic shock
  • Contralateral vocal cord palsy, hemidiaphragmatic paresis/paralysis or pneumo/hemo thorax
  • Severe restrictive pulmonary disorder
  • Electrolyte imbalance
  • Difficulty in communicating with medical personnel
  • Patients refusal
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    C5-C6 group

    The C5-to-C6 nerve roots and supraclavicular nerves are blocked with 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance.

    Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots

  • Experimental
    C5-C8 group

    The C5-to-C8 nerve roots and supraclavicular nerves are blocked with 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance.

    Procedure: Interscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C8 nerve roots

Interventions

  • ProcedureInterscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C6 nerve roots

    With the head rotated contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB), the compactly arranged brachial plexus is visualized lateral to the pulsating subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. The linear ultrasound transducer is moved cephalad until the C5-to-C8 nerve roots are visualized between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. A block needle is introduced from lateral to medial direction. A nerve root is blocked by placing at least 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around it. The most caudal cervical nerve root (C6 nerve root) is blocked first, and the most cephalad one (C5 nerve root) is blocked last. Then, 3 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is placed between the scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles to block the supraclavicular nerves. An equivalent volume of a standard study drug is planned to be used (A total of 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine).

  • ProcedureInterscalene brachial plexus block targeting the C5-to-C8 nerve roots

    With the head rotated contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB), the compactly arranged brachial plexus is visualized lateral to the pulsating subclavian artery under ultrasound guidance. The linear ultrasound transducer is moved cephalad until the C5-to-C8 nerve roots are visualized between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. A block needle is introduced from lateral to medial direction. A nerve root is blocked by placing at least 5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around it. The most caudal cervical nerve root (C8 nerve root) is blocked first, and the most cephalad one (C5 nerve root) is blocked last. Then, 3 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is placed between the scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles to block the supraclavicular nerves. An equivalent volume of a standard study drug is planned to be used (A total of 25 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to achieve 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to achieve 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  2. Time to achieve 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  3. Time to achieve 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  4. Time to achieve 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  5. Time to achieve 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 5th finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  6. Time to achieve 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 5% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  7. Time to achieve 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 10% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  8. Time to achieve 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 50% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  9. Time to achieve 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 90% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  10. Time to achieve 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 95% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  11. Time to achieve 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude measured from the 1st finger

    During the whole study period, the photoplethysmographic waveform obtained from the 1st and 5th fingers ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block is recorded at 100 Hz. The photoplethysmographic amplitude is calculated by subtracting the valley amplitude from the peak amplitude of one heartbeat in photoplethysmographic waveform. Using all the photoplethysmographic amplitudes between 0 and 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle, a sigmoid Emax model is built. From the model, the time point, when 99% of maximum photoplethysmographic amplitude is achieved, can be derived.

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  12. Baseline blood flow measured from the brachial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the brachial artery at the antecubital fossa. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

    Time frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  13. Baseline blood flow measured from the radial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the radial artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

    Time frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  14. Baseline blood flow measured from the ulnar artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the ulnar artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

    Time frame: 15 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  15. Post-block blood flow measured from the brachial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the brachial artery at the antecubital fossa. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  16. Post-block blood flow measured from the radial artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the radial artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  17. Post-block blood flow measured from the ulnar artery ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    The linear ultrasound transducer is placed parallel with the ulnar artery at the distal forearm area. Using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound, time velocity integral per heartbeat is calculated. The cross-sectional diameter of the artery is measured with the transducer placed transversely to the artery. The blood flow of the artery (ml/min) is the product of the averaged time velocity integral (cm), cross-sectional area of the artery (cm2), and heart rate (beats/min).

    Time frame: 25 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  18. Sensory blockade of the C5 dermatome

    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  19. Sensory blockade of the C6 dermatome

    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  20. Sensory blockade of the C7 dermatome

    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  21. Sensory blockade of the C8 dermatome

    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  22. Sensory blockade of the T1 dermatome

    Using an alcohol swab, the sensory blockade of each dermatome is graded as 0 (no cold sensation), 1 (reduced cold sensation), 2 (normal cold sensation).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  23. Motor blockade of shoulder abduction

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  24. Motor blockade of elbow flexion

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  25. Motor blockade of forearm supination

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  26. Motor blockade of forearm pronation

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  27. Motor blockade of finger abduction

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  28. Motor blockade of thumb abduction

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  29. Motor blockade of thumb adduction

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  30. Motor blockade of thumb opposition

    Motor blockade is assessed by rating the force of movement corresponding to each nerve as 0 (complete block), 1 (partial block), or 2 (no block).

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  31. Baseline pupil diameter ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  32. Baseline pupil diameter contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  33. Post-block pupil diameter ipsilateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

    Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  34. Post-block pupil diameter contralateral to interscalene brachial plexus block

    Three minutes after the adaptation in low mesopic conditions, the pupil diameter is measured for 2 seconds at 30 Hz using a portable pupillometer. The pupil diameter is obtained by averaging 60 measurement values.

    Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  35. Pain upon a pinch at the skin area for posterior portal placement (1.5-3 cm inferior and medial to the posterolateral tip of the acromion)

    The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).

    Time frame: 1 minute before the surgical incision

  36. Pain upon surgical incision (1.5-3 cm inferior and medial to the posterolateral tip of the acromion)

    The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).

    Time frame: An average of 1 hour after the introduction of a block needle

  37. Pain upon posterior portal placement (1.5-3 cm inferior and medial to the posterolateral tip of the acromion)

    The pain intensity is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), and 2 (severe pain).

    Time frame: 1 minute after surgical incision

Other outcomes

  1. Complications related to interscalene brachial plexus block

    Accidental puncture of the common carotid, subclavian, or vertebral artery, pneumo/hemothorax, epidural or intrathecal injection of local anesthetic, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and other neurological complications

    Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  2. Baseline systolic blood pressure

    Measured with a non-invasive blood pressure cuff

    Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  3. Post-block systolic blood pressure

    Measured with a non-invasive blood pressure cuff

    Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

  4. Baseline heart rate

    Measured from electrocardiogram

    Time frame: 5 minutes before the introduction of a block needle

  5. Post-block heart rate

    Measured from electrocardiogram

    Time frame: 35 minutes after the introduction of a block needle

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
    Daegu, 42472, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data will be provided upon reasonable requests to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06015204
Lead sponsor
JongHae Kim
Collaborators
Research Institute of Medical Science, Daegu Catholic University
Responsible party
JongHae Kim (Professor, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 29, 2023
Start date
Sep 13, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 28, 2024
Completion
Aug 28, 2024
Last update
Feb 6, 2025

Study contacts

Jonghae Kim, M.D.
principal investigator · Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion