ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06011538WISHUpdated Aug 25, 2023

Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy (WISH)

An interventional study of On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Hysterectomy and LAP, sponsored by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-25.

Sponsored by Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Objectives: To evaluate the potential utility and efficacy of additional on-line, patient education resource for same day discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (SDD LH) compared to standard information resources alone

Trial Design: A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial

Participant Population and Sample Size: 40 women undergoing SDD LH for a benign reason

Eligibility Criteria: Women with gynaecological conditions requiring a laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and who are suitable for same day discharge (SDD).

Interventions: An online patient education website resource and the comparator is standard practice for provision of patient information (written and verbal).

Outcome Measures:

Primary

  • Compliance with SDD Secondary
  • In Hospital:

    o Surgical details / complexity / intraoperative and post-operative serious adverse events (SAEs) according to the Clavien-Dindo system grade II-IV which is a widely used index for the classification of surgical complications [case notes and electronic patient record], and time to discharge

  • 6 weeks:

    • Satisfaction, acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided (bespoke patient questionnaire; Likert scales)
    • Satisfaction with care after LH (6-point Likert)
    • Generic quality of life at 6 weeks post-surgery (EuroQol-5D-5L and VAS);
    • Contact with Community \& Clinical Care Services i.e. outpatients or emergency visits, re-presentations / re-admissions to hospital (Case report form [CRF], case notes, electronic patient record)
    • Serious Adverse Events (CRF, case notes, electronic patient record)
    • Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (Modified items / response categories)
  • 12 weeks:

    • Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (Modified items / response categories) Time to return to work (if working)
Read the detailed description

Aim:

To evaluate the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving. In addition, the utility and acceptability of patient information will be assessed as well as the impact on patient satisfaction and recovery.

Objectives:

The investigators aim to assess various aspects of trial management and design. In order to achieve this, the objectives of the pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be split into:

  • Process Objectives

    • To determine the proportion of eligible women that are screened and meet the inclusion criteria
    • To determine the proportion of eligible women that agree to be randomised
    • To determine the robustness of proposed data collection tools; completion and return rates
  • Clinical Objectives

    • To determine the appropriateness of the outcome measures
    • To derive clinical data to help inform the sample size for a future substantive study (the potential efficacy of additional on-line, patient education for SDD LH in achieving SDD compared to standard information giving).

Trial design and setting

Trial design:

A pilot, parallel, open, single centre, randomised controlled trial.

Trial Setting:

Recruitment to the Web-based Versus Standard Information for Same Day Hysterectomy (WISH) study will take place in gynaecology departments (general and relevant specialist clinics including menstrual disorders and pelvic pain clinics, hysteroscopy and colposcopy services) in an NHS, University-affiliated Teaching Hospital (Birmingham Women's \& Children's Hospital (BWCH) in the UK.

Identification of participants:

Eligible women will be identified by a member of the clinical team responsible for the direct care of the potential participant in outpatient gynaecology clinics and pre-operative assessment clinics in each recruiting centre. Additionally, patients already on the waiting list for SDD LH will be identified and invited to participate. The study will be introduced by a member of the clinical or research team, with full counselling about the trial. The potential participant will be advised that participation in the study is entirely voluntary with the option of withdrawing from the study at any stage. It will be made clear that participation or non-participation will not affect their usual care.

Assessment of Risk:

SDD LH is routinely practiced at the BWCH. Verbal and written, paper-based information is provided. This study provides additional, on-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for SDD LH. Thus, this trial is categorised as: Type A = No higher than the risk of standard medical care.

Eligibility

Women are eligible for recruitment if they meet the inclusion criteria and do not have any of the exclusion criteria set out below:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to give informed consent to participate
  • Have a benign gynaecological condition that is being treated with a LH
  • Eligible to be on same day discharge pathway Patient factors

    • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I/II with no sleep apnoea. ASA III may be suitable if comorbidities are stable and optimised.
    • No known cardio-pulmonary compromise
    • No known renal disease
    • Age \</=60 years
    • BMI \</=40
    • Not indication for admission to Gynaecological Extended Recovery Area (GERU) Surgical factors
    • Presumed benign disease
    • No anticipated surgical complications
    • Concomitant procedures acceptable but surgeon to decide on a case by case basis Discharge factors
    • Residence \< 1 hour from BWCH
    • Access to transport from hospital to home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient above the age of 60
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
  • Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
  • Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space

Consent

It will be the responsibility of the Investigator to obtain informed consent for each participant prior to performing any trial related procedure. A research nurse, research midwife or clinician is able to take consent providing that local practice allows this and responsibility has been delegated by the Principal Investigator as captured on the Site Signature and Delegation Log.

A Participant Information Sheet (PIS) will be provided to facilitate this process either at the time of initial consultation / hospital visit or sent through the post, via email, or by text as an attachment. Investigators or their delegate(s) will ensure that they adequately explain the aim, trial treatment, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of taking part in the trial to the participant. They will also stress that participation is voluntary and that the participant is free to decline to take part and may withdraw from the trial at any time. The participant will be given sufficient time to read the PIS and to discuss their participation with others outside of the site research team. The participant will be given the opportunity to ask questions. Where direct access to patient medical records is required the participant will give explicit consent for the regulatory authorities, members of the research team and or representatives of the sponsor to be given direct access to their medical records.

The Investigator or their delegate will then countersign and date the informed consent form (ICF). A copy of the ICF will be given to the participant (hard copy), a copy will be filed in the medical notes, and the original placed in the Investigator Site File (ISF). Once the participant is entered into the trial, the participant's trial number will be entered on the ICF maintained in the ISF.

Details of the informed consent discussions will be recorded in the participant's medical notes. This will include date of discussion, the name of the trial, summary of discussion, version number of the PIS given to participant and version number of ICF signed and date consent received. Where consent is obtained on the same day that the trial related assessments are due to start, a note should be made in the medical notes as to what time the consent was obtained and what time the procedures started.

Throughout the trial the participant will have the opportunity to ask questions about the trial. Any new information that may be relevant to the participant's continued participation will be provided. Where new information becomes available which may affect the participants' decision to continue, participants will be given time to consider and if happy to continue will be re-consented. Re-consent will be documented in the medical notes. The participant's right to withdraw from the trial at any time will remain.

Details of all patients approached about the trial will be recorded on the Participant Screening/Enrolment Log.

Recruitment, enrolment and randomisation

Recruitment:

Potential participants will be identified and approached by medical staff who are responsible for the direct care of the potential participant after having received appropriate training relating to the trial and who are delegated this task on the site delegation log. Recruitment will take place in gynaecology clinics in gynaecologist lead centres located across the United Kingdom.

The participant eligibility pathway to recruitment and randomisation is illustrated by the trial schema. Eligibility will be confirmed following discussions with the woman and a review of her medical notes by staff delegated this duty by the local principle investigator (PI).

Potential participants will be advised that taking part in the study is entirely voluntary and they may withdraw from the study at any stage without this affecting their usual care. Potential participants will be provided with a research ethics committee (REC) approved Study Participant Information Sheet (PIS) and given time to consider their involvement. However, as the intervention is simply an additional information resource (web-site link), patients will be allowed to consent during the initial consultation in clinic if they are willing to do so (PPI focus group felt that such an approach is acceptable because most women are comfortable with the internet and postal / phone follow up). However, as postal / phone follow up is required for up to 12 weeks, they will be made aware of this and take as much time as they need to consider participation.

Women who give consent will proceed to randomisation if they are eligible to participate in the trial. Consent will be recorded on the approved consent form, the original of which must be retained in the site file with a copy given to the participant.

Enrolment and Screening:

Women with benign gynaecological conditions requiring a LH and who are suitable for a SDD are eligible for inclusion. Prior to clinical consultations, the medical records of potential participants may be screened for eligibility by clinic doctors, nurses, research nurses and research midwives, after having received appropriate training relating to the trial. Clinic doctors will confirm eligibility for the trial. The same process will be applied to patients on the waiting list for SDD LH to identify eligible patients, contact them and invite them to participate.

Randomisation:

After participant eligibility has been confirmed and informed consent has been received, the participant can be randomised into the trial. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 manner to either provision of the on-line SDD LH website resource (intervention) or standard practice for information provision (control). Randomisation will be performed via a web-based platform. If allocated to the intervention, then the website link will be provided in writing, via post, email or text (according to the patient's preference) immediately. Investigators will keep their own study file log which links patients with their allocated trial number in the trial Patient Recruitment and Identification Log.

Blinding:

Patients, clinicians, investigators, research assistants and responsible clinicians will not be blinded to the assigned allocation

Trial treatment / Intervention

Patients with a benign condition listed for a SDD LH agreeing to participate in the study who are allocated the intervention will be provided with the link to the SDD LH patient information website (see Table 1 and the website https://www.mydaycasehysterectomy.com). The option of this educational material will be in addition to the standard verbal and written patient information provided by the BWCH. Patients allocated the control group will receive standard BWCH information only.

The decision to remove or retain cervix (total or sub-total) or remove and retain ovaries will be left to the discretion of the participant in consultation with her gynaecologist. The LH will be performed or supervised by a surgeon who has self-declared as having expertise in laparoscopic hysterectomy and this requires the surgeon to meet minimum standards, regarding experience and case-load. Satisfactory experience will require surgeons to have performed a minimum of 30 cases and to have a current caseload of at least 12 cases per year

02

Conditions studied

  • Hysterectomy
  • LAP

Keywords

  • Same day discharge
  • Laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Educational platform
  • Enhanced recovery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to give to participate
  • Have a benign gynaecological condition that is being treated with a LH
  • Eligible to be on same day discharge pathway Patient factors

    1. /II with no sleep apnoea. ASA III may be suitable if comorbidities are stable and optimised.
    2. No known cardio-pulmonary compromise
    3. No known renal disease
    4. Age \</= 60 years
    5. \</=40
    6. Not indication for admission to Gynaecological Extended Recovery Area (GERU)
  • Surgical factors

    1. Presumed benign disease
    2. No anticipated surgical complications
    3. Concomitant procedures acceptable but surgeon to decide on a case by case basis Discharge factors
    4. Residence \< 1 hour from BWCH
    5. Access to transport from hospital to home

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient above the age of 60
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
  • Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
  • Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space above the age of 60
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with protocol procedures
  • Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for bladder or other pelvic support
  • Women who require concomitant gynaecological surgery for excision of deep endometriosis that requires dissection of the pararectal space
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    On-line SDD LH website resource (intervention)

    Patients allocated the experimental arm will be provided with the link to the SDD LH patient information website (https://www.mydaycasehysterectomy.com).The option of this educational material will be in addition to the standard verbal and written patient information provided by the BWCH.

    Other: On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

  • Active comparator
    Standard practice for information provision (control)

    Patients allocated the control group will receive standard BWCH information only.

    Other: On-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Interventions

  • OtherOn-line, multi-media information on a specifically designed website for Same Day Discharge following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

    A patient educational website that provides clear, easily accessible, patient friendly information explaining what SDD after laparoscopic hysterectomy is, why SDD may be beneficial and what to expect from decision for surgery, through to the admission to hospital and immediate, short and long term recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Same Day Discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (0-23hours)

    This means that the patient is discharged (leaves the hospital) before midnight on the day of surgery (case notes / electronic patient record).

    Time frame: 0-24hours following surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with care on discharge (bespoke patient questionnaire score)

    Patient satisfaction of same day discharge following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). protocol. This will be assessed through bespoke patient questionnaire.

    Time frame: 0-24hours following surgery

  2. Acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided (score)

    Patient satisfaction of acceptability and utility of patient education / information provided. This will be assessed through bespoke patient questionnaire.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Satisfaction with clinical outcome after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (score)

    Patient's satisfaction with clinical outcome after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) through(5-point Likert)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Satisfaction with care on discharge (score)

    Patient's satisfaction with care on discharge through bespoke patient questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Generic quality of life post-surgery (score)

    Patient's Quality of life score using EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Generic quality of life post-surgery (score)

    Patient's Quality of life score using EuroQol-5D-5L visual analogue scale

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Contact with Community & Clinical Care Services

    Serious Adverse Events through case report forms (CRF)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities in days

    Time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the PROMIS-SF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function) questionnaire (item bank v1.2 will be used). Of the 29 items covering relevant activities for our study population, we have selected 8 items and. The selected items and the response categories were chosen by the PPI focus group to reflect the most common and generally applicable day-to-day activities. Participants will record when each activity is resumed, with full recovery being achieved once all 8 personalised activities have been resumed.

    Time frame: 6-12 weeks

  9. Time to return to work (if working) in days

    This will be assessed using bespoke patient questionnaire

    Time frame: 6-12 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lonky NM, Mohan Y, Chiu VY, Park J, Kivnick S, Hong C, Hudson SM. Hysterectomy for benign conditions: Complications relative to surgical approach and other variables that lead to post-operative readmission within 90 days of surgery. Womens Health (Lond). 2017 Aug;13(2):17-26. doi: 10.1177/1745505717714657. Epub 2017 Jun 29. PubMed 28660800 ↗
  • Madhvani K, Curnow T, Carpenter T. Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017. BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):795-802. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15539. Epub 2018 Dec 30. PubMed 30461181 ↗
  • Moawad G, Liu E, Song C, Fu AZ. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188812. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29190666 ↗
  • Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018. PubMed 19835801 ↗
  • Bailey CR, Ahuja M, Bartholomew K, Bew S, Forbes L, Lipp A, Montgomery J, Russon K, Potparic O, Stocker M. Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery. Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):778-792. doi: 10.1111/anae.14639. Epub 2019 Apr 8. PubMed 30963557 ↗
  • Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 28. PubMed 23099039 ↗
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PubMed 19638912 ↗
  • Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):2996-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.2996. PubMed 10601085 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will only be shared as part of results in a peer reviewed publication. No specific or individual participant data will be shared

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2023; primary completion for Dec 2023, 3 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 9, 2023
First posted
Aug 25, 2023
StartEst.
Sep 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2023
CompletionEst.
Mar 2024
Last update
Aug 25, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06011538
Lead sponsor
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2023
Start date
Sep 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2023

Study contacts

Lina Antoun, MD, MRCOG
Contact
lina.antoun1@nhs.net
044 7518613461
Paul Smith, MD, MRCOG
Contact
paul.smith54@nhs.net
TJustin Clark, MD, FRCOG
principal investigator · Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion