An interventional study of Mulligan bent leg raise technique and Static stretching exercise in Hamstring Muscle, Muscle Stretching Exercise and Elastography, sponsored by Suleyman Demirel University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to male participants aged 20 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-21.
Sponsored by Suleyman Demirel University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of thid study was to compare two methods applied to increase the flexibility of the hamstring muscles and objectively evaluate changes in muscle stiffness using the two-dimensional shear wave ultrasound elastography (2D SWE) method. Thirty asymptomatic young individuals with hamstring shortness were divided into two groups by simple randomization. The Mulligan bent leg raise (BLR) technique was applied to the first group, and passive static stretching exercises to the second group. Hamstring flexibility was evaluated with the sit-and-reach test, and muscle stiffness with the 2D SWE method.
Suleyman Demirel University is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
A single session of 3 repetitions of Mulligan bent leg raise was applied to the participants.
Other: Mulligan bent leg raise technique
A single session of 5 repetitive stretching exercises was performed on the participants.
Other: Static stretching exercise
In this study, while the participant was lying on his back on a high bed, the physiotherapist sat on the lateral side of the leg to be treated, placing the popliteal fossa of the participant's knee on his shoulder. The hip and knee of the leg to be stretched were placed in 90° flexion. Distraction was applied to the lower end of the femur, and the participant was asked to push the physiotherapist's shoulder with his leg and then relax. At this relaxation point, the physiotherapist pushed the flexed knee as far as possible in the direction of the ipsilateral shoulder in a painless range.
The participant lay on a stretcher in the supine position with his back straight. The physiotherapist placed the participant's leg on his shoulder with the knee in full extension and supported by the ankle and flexed the hip as much as possible until a tension was felt in the posterior thigh. This position was maintained for 30 seconds.
Back-saver sit-and-reach test
The difference between the back-saver sit-and-reach test and the classical sit-and-reach test is that the former is applied unilaterally. The test was administered using the sit-and-reach test box. The participants were asked to sit on a flat surface and rest the sole of one of their feet flat on the end of the box while keeping the other leg flat on the floor by flexing the knee and hips to 90° and 45° sequentially. Maintaining this position, they were asked to place one hand on the other with their palms facing down, slide their hands on the measuring board, slowly reach forward, wait for a second or two at the last point reached
Time frame: Up to 2 months
Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography
All 2D SWE examinations were performed by a specialist radiologist using the Philips EPIQ-7 (EPIQ Elite Diagnostic Ultrasound System Release 7.0.5 Philips) device with an 18-4 MHz linear probe. These measurements were made with the patient lying in the prone position, with the knees in full extension, the ankle at the end of the stretcher, and the feet hanging down. The probe was placed longitudinally in the middle 1/3 of the hamstring muscles. The participants were asked to keep their muscles in a relaxed position, and no extra pressure was applied to the probe to avoid tissue compression that could artificially affect the measured tissue stiffness
Time frame: Up to 2 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Suleyman Demirel University