CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05972681PAINUpdated May 27, 2026Results posted

The PAIN (Pelvic Area Injection for Numbness) Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bupivacaine and Epinephrine in Vaginal Laceration During Delivery, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-27.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Difficulty with enrollment
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Postpartum pain can interfere with patient's ability to care for themselves, and their newborn, and untreated pain is associated with risk of greater opioid use, postpartum depression, and development of persistent pain. The research hypothesis of this study is that adding a locally injected analgesic, which will take effect once the epidural analgesia fades, may alleviate perineal pain and improve women's overall well-being and satisfaction.

The objective of this study is to determine if prolonged analgesia and higher rate of maternal satisfaction are found when bupivacaine with epinephrine infiltration is used for perineal repair as compared to sham injection in patients with pre-existing effective epidural analgesia at time of perineal laceration repair.

Read the detailed description

Perineal lacerations, the disruption of the skin, mucosa and sometimes muscles that happen commonly during vaginal birth secondary to stretching of the introitus; are present in more than 75% of all vaginal deliveries. These lacerations can be classified based on the location and depth (layers injured). However, the classification of these lacerations does not correlate necessarily with postpartum pain. Severe lacerations, as those compromising the external or internal anal sphincter are less common and associated with more postpartum pain.

It is common practice that only those lacerations causing bleeding, or distortion of normal pelvic anatomy are repaired. The repair of such lacerations at Montefiore Einstein is usually done using lidocaine for non-epiduralized patients; however, for patients with a functional epidural, no anesthetic agents are given locally to aid on long term pain control.

The prevalence of perineal lacerations is more than 75% of all vaginal deliveries. The repair of such lacerations in the institution is usually done using lidocaine for non-epiduralized patients versus no local injection in patients with a pre-existing epidural analgesia. The prevalence of epidural analgesia use among women who underwent vaginal delivery in cross-sectional study of over 2 million deliveries in the United States was 71.1%. Once the analgesic effect of the epidural analgesia fades, the laceration may cause uncontrolled postpartum pain which can affect both the physical and mental recovery period, extend hospital stays, and increase the potential for serious adverse reactions with pain medications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaginal Laceration During Delivery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 402 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy with a singleton pregnancy
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Ongoing functioning epidural throughout the laceration repair
  • Multiparous or nulliparous
  • Ability to consent for themselves

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Underwent an operative vaginal delivery and whose vaginal delivery was complicated by a postpartum hemorrhage
  • Have multiple gestations
  • Complaints of non-functioning epidural
  • Allergic to bupivacaine and/or epinephrine
  • Received an epidural top-off (bolus of local anesthetic injected into the epidural catheter) \< 3 hours from the perineal repair
  • Experienced extreme pain at time of study consent (pain scale score > 3 on 0-10 scale)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Local Anesthesia arm

    Bupivicaine and Epinephrine

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Epinephrine

  • Sham comparator
    Normal saline sham arm

    Other: Sham normal saline arm

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine

    10 milliliters (ml) of bupivacaine 0.50% injected to the vaginal laceration site.

  • DrugEpinephrine

    Epinephrine (1:200,000) injected to the vaginal laceration site.

  • OtherSham normal saline arm

    10 milliliter (ml) of normal saline injected to the vaginal laceration site.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Analgesic

    The average time to first analgesic (TFA), in minutes, will be evaluated as the duration interval from injection to administration of the first analgesic, as applicable.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after perineal laceration

  2. Maternal Satisfaction

    Maternal satisfaction will be assessed by participants' rating their ability to carry out their daily living activities. Participants will rate their ability to carry out these activities at 24 hours, 48 hours and 7 days using a 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = neutral; 4 = poor; or 5 = very poor) such that lower scores are indicative of increased ability to execute daily living activities. No descriptive statistics were completed given the small sample size.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after perineal laceration

  3. Pain Score After Injection at Perineal Laceration

    Participants will self-report measures of symptoms using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine acute and chronic pain. Participants record a single handwritten mark at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of a scale where "no pain" is on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" is on the right end of the scale (10 cm). Measurements from the starting point (left end) of the scale to the patients' marks are recorded in centimeters and are interpreted as the intensity of pain. The values will be used to track pain progression for a patient and to compare pain between patients with similar conditions. No descriptive statistics were completed given the small sample size.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after perineal laceration

07

Results

Posted May 27, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Difficulty recruiting participants resulted in premature termination of the project and not able to collect enough data to determine effect of the intervention

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLocal Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham Arm
Started21
Completed11
Not completed10
Withdrew: Protocol violation10

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to First Analgesic

The average time to first analgesic (TFA), in minutes, will be evaluated as the duration interval from injection to administration of the first analgesic, as applicable.

Time frame:
Up to 24 hours after perineal laceration
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to First Analgesic
minutesLocal Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham Arm
Time to First Analgesic141 ± NA342 ± NA
PrimaryMaternal Satisfaction

Maternal satisfaction will be assessed by participants' rating their ability to carry out their daily living activities. Participants will rate their ability to carry out these activities at 24 hours, 48 hours and 7 days using a 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = neutral; 4 = poor; or 5 = very poor) such that lower scores are indicative of increased ability to execute daily living activities. No descriptive statistics were completed given the small sample size.

Time frame:
24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after perineal laceration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Maternal Satisfaction
score on a scaleLocal Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham Arm
24 hours3 ± NA1 ± NA
48 hours2 ± NA1 ± NA
7 days2 ± NA1 ± NA
PrimaryPain Score After Injection at Perineal Laceration

Participants will self-report measures of symptoms using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine acute and chronic pain. Participants record a single handwritten mark at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of a scale where "no pain" is on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" is on the right end of the scale (10 cm). Measurements from the starting point (left end) of the scale to the patients' marks are recorded in centimeters and are interpreted as the intensity of pain. The values will be used to track pain progression for a patient and to compare pain between patients with similar conditions. No descriptive statistics were completed given the small sample size.

Time frame:
24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after perineal laceration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Score After Injection at Perineal Laceration
score on a scaleLocal Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham Arm
24 hours4 ± NA1 ± NA
48 hours4 ± NA2 ± NA
7 days2 ± NA0 ± NA

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment to end of follow-up, up to 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Local Anesthesia Arm0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Normal Saline Sham Arm0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Local Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham ArmTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years213
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Local Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham ArmTotal
Mean34 (31 to 37)28 (28 to 28)32 (28 to 37)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Local Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham ArmTotal
Female213
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Local Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported213
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Local Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino112
Not Hispanic or Latino101
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Local Anesthesia ArmNormal Saline Sham ArmTotal
United States213
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    The Bronx, New York 10467, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Goh R, Goh D, Ellepola H. Perineal tears - A review. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;47(1-2):35-38. doi: 10.31128/AFP-09-17-4333. PubMed 29429318 ↗
  • Butwick AJ, Bentley J, Wong CA, Snowden JM, Sun E, Guo N. United States State-Level Variation in the Use of Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor for Pregnant Women. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186567. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6567. PubMed 30646335 ↗
  • Dengler KL, Simpson KJ, Strauchon CJ, Shaddeau AK, Brooks DI, Gruber DD. A randomized controlled trial of liposomal bupivacaine for pain following obstetrical laceration. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug;2(3):100115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100115. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PubMed 33345866 ↗
  • Pharmacologic Stepwise Multimodal Approach for Postpartum Pain Management: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 1. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):507-517. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004517. PubMed 34412076 ↗
  • Schinkel N, Colbus L, Soltner C, Parot-Schinkel E, Naar L, Fournie A, Granry JC, Beydon L. Perineal infiltration with lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75%, or placebo for episiotomy repair in parturients who received epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Jul;19(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2. PubMed 20627696 ↗
  • Deshpande JP, Saundattikar GY. Lignocaine Versus Ropivacaine Infiltration for Postpartum Perineal Pain. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):300-303. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.177191. PubMed 28663610 ↗
  • Mahajan A, Derian A. Local Anesthetic Toxicity. StaPearls. Bookshelf ID: NBK499964. PMID: 29763139

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 23, 2025
  • Informed consent form · Jun 26, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05972681
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2023
Start date
Apr 8, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 19, 2025
Completion
Oct 19, 2025
Results posted
May 27, 2026
Last update
May 27, 2026

Study contacts

Fatima Estrada, MD, FACOG
principal investigator · Montefiore Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion