An interventional study of CBT Skills Group for CHR Youth and Individual CBT sessions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR), sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-20.
Sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telehealth interventions for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR). Psychosis typically emerges during late adolescence or early adulthood, significantly impacting long-term functioning. While CHR programs have the potential to reduce illness severity, individuals often face barriers such as stigma and limited access to services. Telehealth interventions could address these barriers and improve treatment accessibility and engagement. The study will focus on Group and Family-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Family-Based CBT, and individual CBT, adapted for telehealth delivery (GF-CBT-TH, F-CBT-TH, and I-CBT-TH). Participants aged 14-25 who meet CHR criteria will be randomly assigned to one of these interventions. Feasibility will be measured by recruitment rate, attendance, and retention. The study will assess the impact of the interventions on cognitive biases, social connectedness, family emotional climate, and proficiency in CBT skills. The three intervention groups will be compared in terms of psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, rates of remission from CHR, and rates of transition to psychosis. Additionally, factors like patient treatment preference, family emotional climate, and sociodemographic factors will be explored as potential moderators of treatment outcomes. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with participants and clinicians to inform dissemination efforts.
Psychosis typically emerges in late adolescence or early adulthood, which is a vital stage in social and cognitive development, and can therefore have a profoundly adverse impact on an individual's long-term functioning. The onset of psychosis is preceded by a clinical high risk (CHR) phase characterized by attenuated psychotic symptoms and functional decline. CHR programs have enormous potential to reduce the long-term severity of the illness, and the suffering and cost associated with it. Youth at CHR also typically have environmental and individual-level barriers to accessing and engaging in services, including stigma, a dearth of trained providers, clinic location and transportation issues, suspiciousness, and a tendency to socially isolate. Reducing some of these barriers via telehealth interventions may improve treatment accessibility and engagement, thereby improving clinical outcomes. There is a substantial need to evaluate different CHR interventions to determine which are most effective. There is also a significant need to systematically investigate remote delivery methods as a way of increasing access to critical services for CHR. The research team have established Group and Family-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (GF-CBT) program in order to facilitate psychosocial recovery, decrease symptoms, and prevent or delay transition to psychosis in youth at CHR. GF-CBT is grounded in sociocultural ecological systems theory, psychosocial resilience models, and research on information processing in delusions. GF-CBT has been implemented as part of SAMHSA funded CHR services in New York, Missouri, and Delaware. The research team have also established Family-Based CBT (F-CBT), in which youth and families learn CBT skills as a family unit, rather than in groups. The research team have adapted GF-CBT, F-CBT and individual CBT for telehealth delivery (GF-CBT-TH, F-CBT-TH and I-CBT-TH). This study will investigate the feasibility of implementing these telehealth interventions in the context of routine CHR services, evaluate the impact of the interventions on engaging target mechanisms hypothesized to underlie their effects, and conduct a preliminary evaluation of their comparative efficacy. Subjects between the ages of 14 and 25 who meet CHR criteria on the SIPS (n=72) and their families will be randomly assigned to receive GF-CBT-TH, F-CBT-TH or I-CBT-TH for a period of 15 weeks. Data will be collected at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Feasibility will be measured by recruitment rate, attendance, and retention. The following intervention targets will be assessed: cognitive biases, social connectedness, family emotional climate, and family members' proficiency in CBT skills. The three groups will be compared across the following domains: psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, rates of remission from CHR, and rates of transition to psychosis. The research team will also explore whether patient treatment preference, family emotional climate and sociodemographic factors differentially moderate treatment outcomes. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with patients, families, and clinicians to inform dissemination and make adaptations to the implementation manuals.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is the lead sponsor of 764 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.
Of its 121 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 82 (68%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion criteria:
GF-CBT via telehealth is an intervention consisting of three parts: 15 group sessions for young people, 15 individual sessions for young people, and 15 group sessions for families. The group sessions for young people and families focus on teaching CBT skills. The goal is to enhance reasoning, decision-making, and positive beliefs while reducing cognitive biases, distress, and isolation. The individual sessions personalize the CBT skills learned in the group, focusing on tailoring skills to personal goals. Family members also participate in group sessions to learn the same CBT skills and how to prompt and support their young family members in using these skills. All sessions are conducted via Telehealth
Behavioral: CBT Skills Group for CHR Youth · Behavioral: Individual CBT sessions · Behavioral: CBT Skills Group for Families
F-CBT via telehealth consists of two parts: 15 family sessions and 15 individual sessions for young people. The family sessions focus on teaching CBT skills to a family units. The individual sessions with youth personalize the CBT skills learned in the family sessions, focusing on tailoring skills to personal goals. All sessions are conducted via Telehealth.
Behavioral: Individual CBT sessions · Behavioral: CBT Skills Group for Families
I-CBT-TH via telehealth consists of two components: 15 CBT Skill Learning sessions and 15 follow-up session that personalizes the learned skills. All sessions are conducted via Telehealth.
Behavioral: Individual CBT sessions
CBT skills group is designed to boost peer support, reduce isolation, normalize psychotic-like experiences to lessen distress, reduce cognitive biases, facilitate positive beliefs, and enhance reasoning and decision-making. CBT skills group uses "CBT to Prevent Paranoia" manual to teach individuals to make adaptive appraisals of their experiences (e.g. voices and other cognitive intrusions) to prevent the perception of such events as threatening.
CBT skills learned in group are personalized in individual sessions focused on: a) facilitating learning of CBT skills; b) tailoring CBT skills to personal goals; c) facilitating successful interaction with peers in the group; and d) providing academic and vocational support. Youth may opt to invite family members to join individual sessions as needed.
Family members are taught the same CBT skills that are taught to CHR youth to facilitate use of CBT skills at home. Family members also learn how to prompt CHR youth to use CBT skills through effective communication, such as empathic listening and encouraging alternative explanations. CBT skills group for family members uses a combination of didactic learning (skills are described in "CBT Skills for Families" manual and demonstrated via video examples) and practice (skills are role-played). Youth attend one group session and one individual session per week, and family members attend one group session per week.
The Global Functioning: Role (GFR) Scale
The Global Functioning: Role (GFR) scale, clinician administered scales, derived from the GAF format. The GFR scale anchor points refer to performance in school, work, or as a homemaker, depending on their primary role. The GFS scale assesses quantity and quality of peer relationships, level of peer conflict, age appropriate intimate relationships, and involvement with family members. Ratings on a 10-point scale (1= Extreme Role Dysfunction to 10 = Superior Role Functioning) with higher scores representing better role functioning.
Time frame: Up to week 28
Global Functioning: Social (GFS) Scale
The Global Functioning: Social (GFS) scales, clinician administered scales, derived from the GAF format. The GFS scale assesses quantity and quality of peer relationships, level of peer conflict, age appropriate intimate relationships, and involvement with family members. The GFS scale scores range from 1 to 10 with higher scores representing better social functioning.
Time frame: Up to week 28
The Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes (SIPS)
Symptom severity will be measured by SIPS, which consists of five positive-symptoms subscales (Unusual thought content/ delusional ideas, Suspiciousness/persecutory ideas, Grandiosity, Perceptual abnormalities/hallucinations, and Disorganized communication), as well as subscales for negative, disorganization, and general symptoms. SIPS will also be used to compare the three arms on rates of remission from CHR and number of transitions to psychosis. There are 19 items on the SIPS. Each item is scored 0-6. There are 5 positive symptom items (range=0-30), 6 negative symptom items (range=0-36), 4 disorganization symptom items (range=0-24), and 4 general symptom items (range=0-24). The range of scores is 0-114. A lower score represents more favorable outcomes.
Time frame: Up to week 28
Peters' Delusions Inventory (PDI)
The Peters' Delusions Inventory (PDI), a self-report scale measuring the presence of 21 common delusional thoughts and the distress, preoccupation, and conviction associated with each belief. The Peters Delusional Inventory (PDI) assesses the presence and severity of delusional beliefs. It is used to measure the intensity and conviction of delusions in individuals experiencing psychosis or related conditions. The PDI consists of a series of statements that the respondent rates based on their agreement or disagreement. The PDI includes a total of 21 items, and each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. There are 3 subscales: Distress, preoccupation and conviction. Higher scores on the PDI indicate a greater intensity and conviction of delusional beliefs. The scale ranges from 0 to 336, with 0 indicating no endorsement of delusion.
Time frame: Up to week 28
Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases
Cognitive biases will be assessed using the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases, a self-report scale that measures cognitive biases across the following sub-scales: Jumping to Conclusions Bias, Belief Inflexibility Bias, Attention for Threat Bias, External Attribution Bias, Social Cognition Problems, Subjective Cognitive Problems, and Safety Behaviors. The scale ranges from 42 to 294, with higher scores indicating higher cognitive biases .
Time frame: Up to week 28
Social Connectedness Scale Revised
Social connectedness will be assessed using the Social Connectedness Scale Revised, a 20-item self-report scale that measures the degree to which one feels connected to their social environment. The scale ranges from 20 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater social connectedness.
Time frame: Up to week 28
Family Attitudes Scale (FAS)
The Family Attitudes Scale (FAS) is a 30-item scale that can be completed by any informant to measure the family emotional climate. Participating family members will complete the Family Attitudes Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating more negative attitudes.
Time frame: Up to week 28
Angry Behaviors Scale (ABS)
Youth will complete the Angry Behaviors Scale (ABS), which is comprised of four items from the FAS. The scale ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater expression of anger.
Time frame: Up to week 28
Plan to share: Yes — All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.
Supporting information: Study protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai